Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 54

Thread: collings

  1. #26
    Registered User eastman_315's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    northeast ohio
    Posts
    243

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by Jesse Harmon View Post
    I guess I don't understand why the F styles are considered more beautiful than an A style. I actually like the A's better, especially some of the oval hole carved tops. Sound trumps everything of course.
    Personally, I'm lusting over 2 & 3 pointers. :-)

    Frank

  2. #27
    Registered User belbein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    Atlanta, GA
    Posts
    2,283
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by eastman_315 View Post
    Personally, I'm lusting over 2 & 3 pointers. :-)

    Frank
    How funny: me too. At first I had to have an F, and thought two pointers were UGGGGGG-ly. The more I looked at Fs, the more I now think they're ugly and unimaginative, and that the not-A, not-Fs are the really nice looking ones. Go figure.
    belbein

    The bad news is that what doesn't kill us makes us stronger. The good news is that what kills us makes it no longer our problem

  3. #28
    Registered User doc holiday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: collings

    "Beauty is in the eye of the beholder"..... perhaps sometimes it's the unattainable. If I dreamed about mandolins....they would be Gibson F4 black-face w/ Handel tuners..... & I've only seen a photo of one lefty F4...... Maybe I'll have to talk to Bill Collings....oh & double-flowerpot :-)

  4. #29
    Registered User Jesse Harmon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    583
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by eastman_315 View Post
    Personally, I'm lusting over 2 & 3 pointers. :-)

    Frank
    Well I suppose my Rigel Q come up a little short in that category but I still love it when I open the case. Agreed on the Two and three pointers though.

  5. #30
    Registered User Timothy S's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    San Francisco, CA
    Posts
    102

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by Austin Bob View Post
    It is interesting how this thread has split in two.


    A vs. F
    Lots of good ideas and thoughts here, bottom line seems to be buy what you like or can afford.

    Custom Builder vs. Production Shop
    This is what I find most interesting. Some think that only a small builder can get attention to detail and quality. Others believe that experience matters: the more mandolins you make the better the final product will be. Still others think that is true only to a certain point. Once you get too big, quality takes a nose dive.

    The number cruncher in me says "show me the data." Of course there's no real way to measure, but these ides persist nevertheless.
    I noticed this too. For what it's worth, I'll chime in and agree with the consensus that sound-wise there is virtually no noticeable difference between body style. Instead, I feel the differences will be attributable to the woods used and the construction.

    I've been debating the custom vs. production thing for a while myself. I'm quickly finding that my Breedlove isn't the best fit for my smaller hands (it's got the wide nut, big frets), so I'm looking at a new mando. However, I'm finding that when comparing instruments and builders, the small shops or single luthier offerings seem to offer better value and attention to detail than production models do. With regards to Collings, I've not been thrilled with QC. The scrolls on a few of the F models I've played aren't finished on the inside.
    Kimble #220
    R. Taylor Style 2 Sinker Redwood/Madagascar Rosewood

  6. #31
    Registered User doc holiday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: collings

    " With regards to Collings, I've not been thrilled with QC. The scrolls on a few of the F models I've played aren't finished on the inside." The unfinished inside of the scroll is a common & traditional way of building & is not unique to Collings mandolins. Have a look at 20's Gibson F5s, Gilchrist, Nugget....et al

  7. #32
    Purveyor of Sunshine sgarrity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,658

    Default Re: collings

    Just get one of each like the rest of us

  8. The following members say thank you to sgarrity for this post:


  9. #33
    Registered Muser dang's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Omaha, NE
    Posts
    1,185

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by OldSausage View Post
    I think the best approach is to choose what you want to believe based on prejudice and the flimsiest of personal experience, and then argue the hind leg off anyone who disagrees with you.
    Just to clarify...
    If I read someone else's opinion in a thread it counts as personal experience, right?
    I should be pickin' rather than postin'

  10. #34
    Registered User Wolfmanbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    261

    Default Re: collings

    Okay Doc...this is all very subjective, so after all it's just my opinion from my own experiences. I know more than a few players who have excitedly handed me their new Collings mandolins (and some that were already a good few years old). A few of them seemed pretty good and quite a few seemed dissappointing, especially for the money. One or two were superb, but those were well into the high end money. I'm just saying, overall, they don't knock me out as you would expect a mandolin in that price category to do. I consistently see instruments from smaller makers that cost the same, or less, that seem far more pleasing in terms of tone and volume. My personal opinion, the Collings name is now over-rated and their quality has fallen off as their operation has expanded.
    RB - (Wolfman Bob)
    Lawrence Smart - 2 Point
    Flatiron - F5 - Artist
    Gibson - F12
    Gibson - A-50
    Flatiron - Pancake
    Fender FM 60 E

  11. #35

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by dang View Post
    Just to clarify...
    If I read someone else's opinion in a thread it counts as personal experience, right?
    It's good enough for me!

  12. #36
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by Timothy S View Post
    The scrolls on a few of the F models I've played aren't finished on the inside.
    I have seen that on other scrolls too, including Gibsons.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  13. #37
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Lincoln, Nebraska
    Posts
    35

    Default Re: collings

    Wolfman. Have you been to the Collings facility? I was fortunate enough to tour it this past January. Granted 22,000 sq. ft is a large place for an instrument builder. But I find it hard to compare them with the likes of Gibson. Collings produces 1/10 of the units that Gibson does yearly. Sure they have grown a good deal, but they still are very dedicated to producing a quality product. I was pretty impressed with their process and find it hard to believe that many builders can match their commitment to quality. All in all every mando is going to have a different sound and feel. The piece of wood the tops and backs are shaped from will be different from one axe to the next. So getting consistency is nearly impossible. Like humans, they are all similar, but also have their own personalities based on setup, time of build, the mind set of the craftsman at the time etc. That's the beauty of it. Most everything in the mandolin process at Collings was done by hand, other than inlay, which was done by a CNC machine.
    Pick your pleasure

  14. #38

    Default Re: collings

    If you tell Bill Collings he has a QC problem, he's going to want to know the facts. One thing about Collings, if there is an issue, even if you bought the mandolin used they step up to the plate.

    The last few MF5's I played had me thinking about shedding some of my luthier built instruments.
    "your posts ... very VERY opinionated ...basing your opinion/recommendations ... pot calling ...kettle... black...sarcasm...comment ...unwarranted...unnecessary...."

  15. #39
    Registered User mtucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles CA
    Posts
    1,500

    Default Re: collings

    Like their guitars, Colling's builds great mandolins .. difficult to impossible to find quality flaws in any of their products.

  16. #40
    Middle-Aged Old-Timer Tobin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Kerrville, TX
    Posts
    4,004

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by 8_stringer View Post
    The piece of wood the tops and backs are shaped from will be different from one axe to the next. So getting consistency is nearly impossible. Like humans, they are all similar, but also have their own personalities based on setup, time of build, the mind set of the craftsman at the time etc. That's the beauty of it.
    I think that bears repeating. It seems to be something that most people know, but choose to largely disregard in discussions like this. Wood is not a uniform product. Every piece of wood, even from the same tree, will have different properties. Even in the same piece of wood, there will be variations in density, grain, etc., across its length or width or thickness. That's just how trees grow. And since the wood used in a mandolin has a huge effect on tone, it's not only unfair but unrealistic to expect some magical level of "quality control" in tone. Not without going to synthetic materials that can be produced in a controlled environment, which sort of defeats the whole idea behind a traditionally made wood instrument.

    Construction techniques and the quality of the details during the build? Yeah, that's one thing to expect uniformity on. But final tone is very much a product of the properties of the wood which are often going to be beyond our measuring abilities.

    They can carefully chose the woods they use, and perform any number of inspections on each piece as they build a mandolin. But at the end of the day, the final sound the mandolin makes is a matter of chance. Unrealistic expectations do not mean that quality control has slipped. As others here have mentioned, even some original Lloyd Loar Gibsons can be disappointing on tone.

    The different characters of each individual instrument are what make them interesting. I'm not sure if I'd trust a maker if all of his instruments sounded exactly the same!

  17. The following members say thank you to Tobin for this post:


  18. #41
    Purveyor of Sunshine sgarrity's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    San Diego, CA
    Posts
    5,658

    Default Re: collings

    If you think a builder getting a consistent sound is nearly impossible, then you need to play more of them and listen closely. Why do you think a Collings sounds like a Collings and a Gibson sounds like a Gibson? Now, there is certainly a tonal range that each builder builds within and there can certainly be outliers on occasion. But arguing that Collings mandolins aren't consistent? C'mon now......

  19. #42
    Fred Gilmartin Fred G's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts
    499

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by 8_stringer View Post
    Collings produces 1/10 of the units that Gibson does yearly.
    So are we talking Gibson instrument production, Bluegrass instrument production or mandolin production? so we are figuring Collings produces 100 mandolins and Gibson is making 1,000? 200, 2,000.... I have not heard much about where they are making them but I never thought they were making that many in the opry mills factory. Seemed like a pretty small shop then.

  20. #43
    Registered User doc holiday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: collings

    To return towards our regularly scheduled program...the OP did ask about A style vs F style mandolins. Here's a clip of Adam Steffey playing his Collings MT2V...and Sierra Hull playing an F style Gibson:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0eOAugV3QI

  21. #44
    Registered User Wolfmanbob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    261

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by doc holiday View Post
    To return towards our regularly scheduled program...the OP did ask about A style vs F style mandolins. Here's a clip of Adam Steffey playing his Collings MT2V...and Sierra Hull playing an F style Gibson:

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c0eOAugV3QI

    Which again reminds that most of the tone comes from the player.
    RB - (Wolfman Bob)
    Lawrence Smart - 2 Point
    Flatiron - F5 - Artist
    Gibson - F12
    Gibson - A-50
    Flatiron - Pancake
    Fender FM 60 E

  22. #45
    Registered User doc holiday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: collings

    No question about that WMB. As a kid, no matter how much I practiced, I always sounded more like a teenager who would rather be playing football, than I did like Glenn Gould...even on my teacher's Steinways. So here's another clip of Adam S playing Sierra's Gibson & Sierra playing the Collings:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F9BFap-L-Bk
    Last edited by doc holiday; Mar-14-2013 at 1:28pm.

  23. #46
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: collings

    I played a few of the mandolins that were available at Gibson in the Opry Mills mall there. I played an A9 and a modern Master Model, I forget now what it was, and of course I could hear and feel the difference. That night I was playing my own 1923 A2 back in the hotel, and you can hear a family resemblance. They all sounded more alike than they sounded like other mandolins I have played.

    The only Collings I have played are several of the MTs, and they sound really wonderful. I have loved playing everyone.

    There are enough differences between individual instruments, for so many reasons, that I would want to play any instrument before I purchased it. That being said, it is not unreasonable, with todays tools and expertise, to find similarities and resemblances between like instrument of the same make. While different, they may be less different from each other than they are from other makers.

    In general, my experience is that F style and A style instruments are not more different than can be explained by being just different instruments, and further, there is nothing like a resemblance among F styles, or among A styles. Any given A style and F style are likely to be as different from each other as each is to another A or F.

    Within a given manufacturer there may be similarities, if, for example, the company makes Fs with one kind of wood, and As with another, or other things related to assembly or age or finish, but not anything that can be attributed to the style of the mandolin, A or F.

    Scrolls just look so darn cool.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  24. #47
    Registered User mandowilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Taos, NM
    Posts
    458

    Default Re: collings

    I am in the own one of each camp and they are very different.
    Some days I love the MT2 and other times the MF5.

  25. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to mandowilli For This Useful Post:


  26. #48
    Registered User doc holiday's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    alberta
    Posts
    1,338

    Default Re: collings

    .....good enough for Chris Thile:

    http://www.dailymotion.com/video/x6y...c#.UUPAI9E-swE

  27. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to doc holiday For This Useful Post:


  28. #49
    ************** Caleb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    3,676

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by 8_stringer View Post
    Wolfman. Have you been to the Collings facility? I was fortunate enough to tour it this past January. Granted 22,000 sq. ft is a large place for an instrument builder. But I find it hard to compare them with the likes of Gibson. Collings produces 1/10 of the units that Gibson does yearly. Sure they have grown a good deal, but they still are very dedicated to producing a quality product. I was pretty impressed with their process and find it hard to believe that many builders can match their commitment to quality. All in all every mando is going to have a different sound and feel. The piece of wood the tops and backs are shaped from will be different from one axe to the next. So getting consistency is nearly impossible. Like humans, they are all similar, but also have their own personalities based on setup, time of build, the mind set of the craftsman at the time etc. That's the beauty of it. Most everything in the mandolin process at Collings was done by hand, other than inlay, which was done by a CNC machine.
    I've also toured the factory and was impressed. The thing that struck me was the attention to detail each step of the process. Nothing was halfway done or shoddily passed along. And each instrument at the end of the line was gone over with a fine toothed comb type inspection. To say QC is low at Collings is just not factual. I've seen how it works there, and they'll let anyone come in and see for himself (for free).
    ...

  29. #50

    Default Re: collings

    Quote Originally Posted by sgarrity View Post
    If you think a builder getting a consistent sound is nearly impossible, then you need to play more of them and listen closely. Why do you think a Collings sounds like a Collings and a Gibson sounds like a Gibson? Now, there is certainly a tonal range that each builder builds within and there can certainly be outliers on occasion. But arguing that Collings mandolins aren't consistent? C'mon now......
    Collings is very picky about wood and Bruce is the only person shopping and picking out wood there. It is the only way to keep the consistency on track. You will see, that now, they have stopped taking order on ukes as they are looking for "suitable" wood. QC is something you need to work on. There have been other companies that have suffered in this area and it showed.

    Little birdie told me that Sierra would really like a Collings, like Sarah's......
    "your posts ... very VERY opinionated ...basing your opinion/recommendations ... pot calling ...kettle... black...sarcasm...comment ...unwarranted...unnecessary...."

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •