Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Back/side mando woods

  1. #1
    Registered User mingusb1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Burlington, NC
    Posts
    675

    Default

    Hello, just wondering about the woods used for the backs and sides of mandolins. #Would you expect volume/tone differences necessarily from:

    --maple vs. mahogany
    --flamed maple vs. quilted maple
    --eastern vs. western vs. european maple
    --2-piece vs. 1-piece backs

    Or are those differences basically cosmetic?

    Thanks!
    Z
    Member since 2003!

  2. #2
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,859

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (mingusb1 @ Dec. 20 2004, 11:54)
    Would you expect volume/tone differences necessarily from:

    --maple vs. mahogany
    yes
    --flamed maple vs. quilted maple
    no
    --eastern vs. western vs. european maple
    maybe, depends more on hardness and stiffness, which overlap in these maples
    --2-piece vs. 1-piece backs
    no
    The question was: what would I expect, those are just my answeres.

  3. #3
    Registered User Strado Len's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    132

    Default

    I am not a builder, but I would answer yes to all of the above, except for 1-piece vs. 2-piece back. The tonal differences between these differing woods are significant and have been previously discussed, and you might want to search for these threads. In general, the harder woods will give you a sharper, brighter sound, while the softer woods are warmer in tone. Mahogany is generally not used for bluegrass mandolins, as it is not as punchy sounding as maple.

  4. #4
    Mandolin & Mandola maker
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Bega NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,421

    Default

    I agree with Strado, yes to everything except for 1-piece vs. 2-piece backs. #Every species of wood, be it Rock Maple, Big Leaf Maple, European Maple, Mahogony, Walnut or Myrtle has it's own characteristic sound. #Flamed Maple is usually quarter sawn, wheras quilted is slab sawn. #Quarter sawn is stiffer than slab sawn, so will sound different.



    Peter Coombe - mandolins, mandolas and guitars
    http://www.petercoombe.com

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    486

    Default

    OK---each species of wood has its unique sound qualities. However, until someone does a piece of basic research that might involve recordable evidence, all opinions remain subjective!!! Maple may have been the backwood of choice to early luthiers because of its ability to take varnish so nicely and to negate the use of a filler for pores. I would not be afraid to try just about any type of wood as long as it had a resonable stiffness to it. Some nice outcomes can be gained by using quarter sawn wood for backs. After all--who decreed that the back of an instrument could not resonate along with the top. Until I see evidence to the contrary, I will continue to experiment.

  6. #6
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,736

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (pelone @ Jan. 02 2005, 12:12)
    However, until someone does a piece of basic research that might involve recordable evidence, all opinions remain subjective!!! #
    I believe that Dr. Dave Cohen has been doing extensive research on mandolin acoustics.

    Jim
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  7. #7
    wood butcher Spruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orcas Island, Washington
    Posts
    6,172

    Default

    This statement:
    "#Every species of wood, be it Rock Maple, Big Leaf Maple, European Maple, Mahogony, Walnut or Myrtle has it's own characteristic sound."

    Combined with this statement:
    "The question was: what would I expect, those are just my answeres. "

    Does not equal this statement:
    "OK---each species of wood has its unique sound qualities."

    Again...
    It's not the wood that displays the tonal characteristics, it's how a particular builder's style relates to the species in question...

    Especially when you're talking about comparing woods that can be very similar in their densities, like:
    --flamed maple vs. quilted maple and
    --eastern vs. western vs. european maple

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grass Valley California
    Posts
    3,727

    Default

    It is not just the stiffness of a back plate, but the proportional stiffness both along the grain and across the grain. Several studies have been performed on this aspect of wood and the conclusion is that , (drum rollllll) wood varies! Even pieces taken from the same tree can exhibit considerable variation. So, the question you need to ask is "can my luthier get the sound that I want?" As Spruce stated, the luthier is the greatest variable in the equation. This is not to say that the materials don't effect the tone. They do, and wise selection of materials is a big benefit to the outcome of the pending instrument if they are skillfully used.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Oregon
    Posts
    486

    Default

    Hey--jgarber. I read Dr. Cohen's short abstracted research note and to my less educated brain, did not identify one shred of information that would aid any discerning builder the ability to resonably compare and/or contrast wood choices for backs or sides of mandolins. Not once did the good Dr. even identify species of woods or even attempt to rank order any wood based on superior tonality. I am going to wake up and smell the shavings!! i.e., do not let convention or the opinion of "experts" determine what might be attempted. I recomend building for the satisfaction of a well constructed and lovely sounding instrument, regardless of the accepted material. Beauty is in the eye.

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Northern California coast
    Posts
    2,034

    Default

    Pelone, "the good Dr." did the first three studies on mandolin acoustics, period. He is not a wood researcher. His focus, along with that of his coworkers, is mechanical vibration. Before you come to the conclusion that "science" has nothing to contribute if it does not immediately come up with all of the answers, try extending your homework time beyond just reading an abstract or two.

    Dr. Dan Haines is a wood researcher. Try googling his name. In case you come up short, here is a specific reference which will command more than just reading an abstract.

    Haines, Daniel W., "The Essential Properties of Wood Prepared for Musical Instruments", Catgut Acoustical Society Journal, 4 No. 2 (Series II), pp. 20-32, Nov., 2000.

    A couple more things for your consideration:

    the old LMI catalogue, from when Todd Taggart was at the helm.

    anything you can find by wood researcher Voichita Bucur. She is located in Nancy, France.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Northern California coast
    Posts
    2,034

    Default

    Almost forgot; luthier/scientist Dave Hurd (aka "Kawika") had an article in American Lutherie a few years back, and he has just published a book on "Left brain lutherie".

  12. #12

    Default

    Since there is only 2% virgin timber left in this country. Will the tone wood sound we equate with greatness be unattainable in years to come?

    I am in the tree growing business here in the south. We of course grow pine trees for paper as well as lumber production. Hardwoods are also farmed in this part of the country.

    My U.S.Forestry agent explained that once both hardwoods and pine trees are exposed to commercial fertilizers through farming or from incidential exposure in ground water. The growing cycles will be altered forever.

    Hardwoods that took 30 or 40 years to mature in the virgin timber days, are now maturing in 9.5 to 15 years. That will mean much wider growth rings. That of course makes the tight grained woods of old even more difficult to come by and more expensive.

    Does this mean that Loar-era mandolins will one day demand prices equal to violins built by Strad-o-whats his name?

    JIM S.

  13. #13
    two t's and one hyphen fatt-dad's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Richmond, Virginia
    Posts
    7,635

    Default

    Question: Isn't the one piece back cut on a different grain that the two piece back? As such, wouldn't the cut on the grain affect the dynamics/acoustic properties of the completed instrument?

    f-d
    ¡papá gordo ain’t no madre flaca!

    '20 A3, '30 L-1, '97 914, 2012 Cohen A5, 2012 Muth A5, '14 OM28A

  14. #14
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,859

    Default

    One piece, and two piece backs, both can be flat sawn, or quarter sawn, or somewhere in between.

    I looked at the original questions as being asked one at a time. In other words, flamed vs. quilted means: flamed, quarter sawn, stiff, big leaf maple vs. quilted, quarter sawn, stiff, big leaf maple, for example.

Similar Threads

  1. Show off your back side
    By Scotti Adams in forum Videos, Pictures & Sound Files
    Replies: 484
    Last: Feb-07-2020, 10:41am
  2. #5 back side
    By maxx250 in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 1
    Last: Mar-24-2008, 11:08pm
  3. Bending over back woods
    By dunbarhamlin in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 19
    Last: Aug-31-2005, 6:34pm
  4. Tuned Top & Back Woods
    By JDSmith in forum Builders and Repair
    Replies: 5
    Last: Jan-31-2005, 12:06pm
  5. Davis F-5 # 64 back side
    By in forum Videos, Pictures & Sound Files
    Replies: 0
    Last: Jan-01-1970, 12:00am

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •