Page 2 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 26 to 50 of 97

Thread: 1923 Fern Loar F5

  1. #26
    Registered User tree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    northern Virginia
    Posts
    1,575

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Bump.

    It's baaack.
    Clark Beavans

  2. #27
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Sam Bush thinks this is the best sounding Loar he has played. Others have had similar comments about it. No financial interest here, just passing info along. This apparently is a very special sounding Loar, and it is extremely unique.
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  3. #28
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    45

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    The areas under the nut that look like cracks or wood splices are not. They are just unusual grain lines.

  4. #29

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Hopefully this Fern will end up in the hands of a pro, so we can see it out and about and getting played, as opposed to a collector...

  5. #30
    Registered User John Duncan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    395

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Not many players can afford that.
    My Youtube Channel: http://bit.ly/1F9sJ8G

  6. #31
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    6,470

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Maybe you can get one of those "car deals" to buy it. Like 0% interest for 10 years would make the payments about $1740.00 per month. While that sounds like a lot many make that kind of a payment on a house or a fancy car. I have yet to find a house or car I could pick and sound that good.

  7. #32
    Registered User Hallmark498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    372

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by Darryl Wolfe View Post
    Sam Bush thinks this is the best sounding Loar he has played. Others have had similar comments about it. No financial interest here, just passing info along. This apparently is a very special sounding Loar, and it is extremely unique.
    Im no Sam Bush , but was able to play this mando at SPBGMA....The action was a little higher than I liked. The sound was KILLER! Best mandolin Ive ever played. (think this was my 8th Loar to play)

    It had some little things going on, (repairs or such on the binding, something funky with the scroll) but in really great condition. Note...Im not a repair guy or pro player, just a guy that likes mandos and guitars, these are only observations.

  8. #33
    Registered User Tom C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Warwick, NY
    Posts
    3,986

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by f5loar View Post
    Maybe you can get one of those "car deals" to buy it. Like 0% interest for 10 years would make the payments about $1740.00 per month. While that sounds like a lot many make that kind of a payment on a house or a fancy car. I have yet to find a house or car I could pick and sound that good.
    ....And I've yet to find a mando I could live in or drive. But that one looks like it oozes mojo.

  9. #34
    Registered User Hallmark498's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    texas
    Posts
    372

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Mojo yes sir! It had the feel, sound and smell.

  10. #35

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    From some of these pics, it looks like this might have an overspray of lacquer..... yes... no .... ?
    John D

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    seattle washington
    Posts
    298

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    It sure looks right to me.

  12. #37
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by JFDilmando View Post
    From some of these pics, it looks like this might have an overspray of lacquer..... yes... no .... ?
    No...that's a slightly unique look that July 9 mandolins have, including mine. It is an overcoat of some sort, but appears more like a sprayed or french polished shellac that is harder than the varnish. I think (just an opinion) they may have been experimenting with a few techniques to speed the time from finish to ship. The May and June mandolins preceeding the July 9 all have dead soft type of finish that wears easily and has that gummy sticky look.

    Just to add to the speculation, I believe somebody other that Gibson (contract shop, or a person brought in) did the finish on the earlier light colored ones...and that they went throught the lengthy violin style varnishing
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  13. #38

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Darryl;
    When you say the earlier ones, how much earlier are you talking... all the way back to '22 ? There seems to be quite a change in color happening in '23... and then of course the continuation through to the dark '24's....
    Given the passage of years, and your observations, how do you think the various finish experiments, or treatments have held up compared to one another...? We all know how the later Ferns have held up.... with significant shrinkage cracks, and checking... not so great....
    John D

  14. #39
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Darryl;
    When you say the earlier ones, how much earlier are you talking... all the way back to '22 ?

    No. I am basically referring to the 72205-72210ish ones. Mostly in Feb 23. There is something very different going on with these

    Also, most, but not all of the '22's look fairly typical and not like the aforementioned. There are some light colored individual one, but most look normal
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  15. #40
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Darryl, your knowledge of detail never ceases to amaze me. I am reminded of the time you told me the year of my D18 from a picture you saw of me holding it. I am very familiar with 72210, and play it with some regularity. Only after you mentioned it, but yes the finish is different than the usual Loar. I once played 72211. It is very different than 72210 in terms of color, finish, wood selection and sound. I bet they have different FONs, even though consecutive serial numbers. It also is a very light color, like a couple of 1922s that reside in California.
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  16. #41
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    6,470

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Consecutive numbers don't mean they were finished by the same master craftsman. Could just be two different guys putting it on.
    That Feb. '23 batch is really light but some light finishes show up in other dates too. The lightest Loar I ever saw was 75848 and it's a March 31, 1924.

  17. #42
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    508

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by Darryl Wolfe View Post
    No...that's a slightly unique look that July 9 mandolins have, including mine. It is an overcoat of some sort, but appears more like a sprayed or french polished shellac that is harder than the varnish. I think (just an opinion) they may have been experimenting with a few techniques to speed the time from finish to ship. The May and June mandolins preceeding the July 9 all have dead soft type of finish that wears easily and has that gummy sticky look.

    Just to add to the speculation, I believe somebody other that Gibson (contract shop, or a person brought in) did the finish on the earlier light colored ones...and that they went throught the lengthy violin style varnishing
    Didn't I read once wher David McLaughlin was telling about removing a gummy top coat from the finish on his Loar?
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  18. #43
    Adrian Minarovic
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, Europe
    Posts
    3,479

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Aldridge View Post
    Didn't I read once wher David McLaughlin was telling about removing a gummy top coat from the finish on his Loar?
    That was likely just old wax/polish that previous owner applied too thickly and it weathered. The finish which was under that mess looks authentic.
    Adrian

  19. #44
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Aldridge View Post
    Didn't I read once wher David McLaughlin was telling about removing a gummy top coat from the finish on his Loar?
    Yes...David's was one of the gummy sticky looking ones..and it still has a slightly matte and textured look to it
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  20. #45

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    In another thread, Ken W. made the provocative (his words) statement that he believed that this mandolin went back to the factory for the Fern inlay in '26. That would of course place this in a nonfern category.... I looked through the archives as closely as the photos would allow, and could only find one possible piece of evidence for this... a small fern tip difference, which Darryl could explain by the black paint on the peghead obscuring the MOP. From my examination then, I cannot support Kens contention... at all. I believe that this "question" that Ken raises is an important one, if anyone else in the world takes it seriously. This is an historical instrument. Has anyone else critically looked at this inlay with regards to Ken's assertions ? Or for the most part, has this community dismissed Ken's suggestions as baseless...
    It would be great if Ken would offer his evidence... for such an important provocation.
    John D

  21. #46
    Cafe Linux Mommy danb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1996
    Location
    Norfolk, England
    Posts
    5,813

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    It seems to me that some other possible explanations are a bit more probable, but then none of us were there so it's hard to really be sure.

    Stamp numbers (under the loar signature label!) would sure help untangle the mysteries a bit more. Joe's book makes a pretty good case that the stamp number is indicitive of the BUILD date, and the serial is indicitive of the shipping date.. then again, the dates that are signed onto the Loars could very well not match *either* of those..
    The Mandolin Archive
    my CDs
    "The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead"

  22. #47
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    George gave me a call last night to let me/us know the price has been lowered. $190,000
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  23. #48
    Registered User Justus True Waldron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Schuylerville, NY
    Posts
    564

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Great, now I only need to come up with the other $186k... or if I trade in my mando $181k... actually I just put an offer on an old house out here for less than half of what that mando costs! Still I think it would be worth it...
    - 2004 Macica A
    - 1952 Selmer Centered Tone
    - Eastwood electric mandola
    (and lots more)

  24. #49

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    Hey, maybe we can talk Steve Martin into buying it and then letting each of us borrow it!

  25. #50

    Default Re: 1923 Fern Loar F5

    I seem to remember F5 saying something like.... the first $175 k will walk home with this instrument.... getting close to his prognostication... just get to the seller, who was indeed the guy that had the "advert" on ebay, they confirmed that to me...dodge the commission, and make the sale at F5's asking price... this really opens the eyes to the economy and the state of vintage instruments... this is a significant Loar, in really nice shape, with perhaps one of the best voices around, according to those in the know.... and there is sits.

    JohnD
    John D

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •