Also--and perhaps more importantly--the visual cue prompts us into a type of thinking/perceiving/experiencing. We are cue-ed by a great many things (it might even be said that virtually our entire experience is prompted by given cues--to varying degrees), but the visual cue is our strongest reference: when we learn something by visual reference (typically--the fretboard) we form neural pathways that are triggered by those cues, forever more...unless, of course, we make effort to re-route, circumvent, and otherwise "short-circuit" those established pathways, with which we might have varying levels of relative success. But, the learning is no trivial matter--and no small contendewr to override--we are animals of routine/ritual
WRT creativity--and improvisation--the implications are great (in psychotherapy, Jung advocated--as do the zen buddhists--for the importance of seeing things from different perspectives...this is why imagination is the key to empathy)
For me, playing the woodwind has been the most intimate of instrument-playng experiences--for the reasons you cite Niles.
Quite so. The player is a nexus where the disparate parts of the kit and rhythms converge. There is a lot going on inside the player--between the beats--that a player must master in order to render the beat--make music--in optimal fashion
Bookmarks