I think the Alexander Hamilton reference may be more applicable in the instance of finding an accomodating group when one hasn't rudiments together--than in the basic skill of learning how to keep time with a metronome.
Receiving feedback from peers in musical situations is of course beneficial. The OP indicated that THIS group gave him THIS feedback: ...apparently i wasnt to good for them but for the first time ever playing with people that played songs faster then i imagined my rhythm was terrible!
In musician's lingo, that means head back to the woodshed for a spell.
It's not a particularly good idea to try to play beyond one's abilities in a group if the expectations of that group are a standard of basic musicianship. The result could, in fact, be counterproductive--possibly even compelling an aspiring player to "almost give up." Bluegrass jams tend to be less forgiving than OT jams, as well.
Nor is it a particularly good idea to learn timekeeping from a group whose time keeping is suspect--which may be the case in groups more accomodating of players with poor time. A surefire way to learn surefire timekeeping is with use of a surefire timekeeping device.
The easiest, quickest, and most efficient way to learn to play with good time is to learn how to use timekeeping devices--a plethora of models are available. With regards to online sources--in the words of the hot young percussion players in the salsa band I play in: "why not use the resources available?--you're cheating yourself if you don't." This is what people your age, Shawn, who aspire to advanced-level playing are doing between jams. While you're searching for a suitable-level group, do some woodshedding. You won't always have access to a suitable group with whom to experiment, make mistakes, and receive feedback, but you can study on your own at 3 am so that you're better prepared the next time you get with that group, or advance to the higher-level group. Reliance upon the tradition of oral transmission and "group study" is quaint, but not the most effective. Music is not rocket science, as has been mentioned, but the way to get ahead is to do your homework, nonetheless. And if your ambition is to be the star soloist, you best be woodsheddin'--it's what your peers are doing.
Playing with good feel is another, broader matter--something more nuanced, that playing with and among others will certainly help you acquire. But you must learn to play with good time, first, before those whose playing you emulate will want to have you play with them, in my experience. The inclination is to try to do it all at once, but an unanalytical approach will impede your progress and at times feel overwhelming and confusing, as Lonelyhearts mentioned. You already know what you want to sound like, so you must figure out how to get there. If the group with whom you played hadn't given you that feedback--if they don't have standards--then you perhaps wouldn't think they sounded so good. It was a good test, and now you know what to study for before you take that test again. We typically don't go from middle school straight into college.
Don't get discouraged, and minimize feelings of discouragement by avoiding inappropriate group situations. Embrace feedback, take a step back, learn. Even advanced-level players work on rudiments when they feel they need to. Identify your weaknesses, isolate the problem, and work on it. You'll be progressing much faster.
Bookmarks