Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Full contact bridges

  1. #1
    Cluster Plucker Scott Crabtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    97

    Default Full contact bridges

    Any insight to which is a better bridge, full contact or your traditional style?
    “Music speaks what cannot be expressed, soothes the mind and gives it rest, heals the heart and makes it whole, flows from heaven to the soul"
    __________________________________

    You can play a shoestring if your sincere ~John Coltrane

  2. #2
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,123

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    If You are really curious Go for it ! try them both.

    'Better' is so subjective.. and your ears are not something I, or anyone else, can run from a qwerty keyboard.

    I have a Full contact bridge and a 2 foot on 2 different 20's 'A' mandolins , the whole instrument is different, and I attribute the sound difference to the totality and not just the bridge difference.
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  3. #3
    Registered User 300win's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,507
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    The Gibson Sam Bush model mandolin has a full contact bridge. Seeing as how Sam is pretty dog-gone good, it might be something to it as fas as making a differance in tone and volume. I might try one myself one day on my F-5, as I have a brand new Cumberland bridge in my other mandolin case. But for now I'll use what I have on mine, which is the factory bridge, but it has a very small gap between the two feet of the base, pretty close to being full contact now, so I don't know if it would make any differance one way or the other. I also have a Cumberland installed on my A-9 that is very similar as far as the gap between the feet of the base. Both mandolins sound great, plenty of volume, and very good tone on each. The F has a darker sound than the A, but I also have Sam Bush Gibson strings on the F, and J-75's on the A so that probably has something to do with it also. The A has a brighter tone, more ringy, not as quick of a decay as the F. Mandolins are weird little beast, every one of them is differant. Lot of things to consider as far as tone, volume, etc.

  4. #4
    Cluster Plucker Scott Crabtree's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2009
    Location
    Santa Cruz
    Posts
    97

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    I have a cumberland as you descibed above, with the small gap between the two feet. I just wonder how the full contact bridge effects the tonality, etc...darker tone, tighter mids, I don't know?
    “Music speaks what cannot be expressed, soothes the mind and gives it rest, heals the heart and makes it whole, flows from heaven to the soul"
    __________________________________

    You can play a shoestring if your sincere ~John Coltrane

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,966

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    Which is better depends upon the particular instrument. On some the gap seems to give better clarity and tone. On others, it seems the full contact works better. It has to do with several things. Top thickness seems to be a particularly important factor. Brace size also seems to matter. When all else fails, experiment and see what you think.
    Have a Great Day!
    Joe Vest

  6. #6
    Registered User Knucklehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Tarantula Trace Trail, AZ
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    What about gluing down the bridge base; is this recommended? If you were to go this route, what type of adhesive would you use?

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    victoria, canada
    Posts
    3,514

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    Quote Originally Posted by Knucklehead View Post
    What about gluing down the bridge base; is this recommended? If you were to go this route, what type of adhesive would you use?
    I'm not a luthier (nor do I play one on TV) but I'm going to take a wild guess and say...NO, NO, NO....never!!

    I'll let others who can do a better job of it explain why.

  8. #8
    Registered User 8ch(pl)'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Suburb of Dartmouth, Nova Scotia
    Posts
    2,221

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    A floating bridge is virtually a necessity on a mandolin. The reason is to make it adjustable for intonation. This can be affected by many things:

    String Guage, a change in the diameter of strings can affect the intonation.

    Humidity, this can cause a need to adjust the height of the bridge, which can bear on the intonation.

    Fret wear, this has an affect of changing the scale length slightly, needing an adjustment of the bridge to compensate.

    The shorter scale of a mandolin makes small changes more pronounced than say, that of a flat top guitar, which normally has a pin bridge.

    It is not a good idea to glue the bridge to the top.

  9. #9
    Registered User jim_n_virginia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Back in Virginia
    Posts
    3,524

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    I've tried both and prefer the sound of the traditional bridge. Some people make the mistaken conclusion that if the entire bridge is in contact with the top you get more sound this is not neccessarily so. Look at a fiddle a very small amount of the bridge contacts the top just two little small feet and yet a tremendous amount of sound is projected.

    It's like Joe says depends on the instrument. I have also heard of people using sound putty to bridge the gap between the feet of a traditional bridge.

    Best thing to do is get both and try them out. But mark the spot where your bridge is because for me anyways it takes me a good while to figure out the exact sweet spot for my bridge for perfect intonation.

    And NO do not glue your bridge down! It's a floating bridge and made that way.

  10. #10
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,123

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    Knuckleheaded, ... A glued down bridge would Only be on like an Ovation/Applause Mandolin,
    they look just like the flat top guitar's though,
    not to be confused with any others.
    An arch top guitar's bridges are not glued down either ..

    neither are those on Violins, violas, cellos or Doghouse Basses..
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Panama Cit
    Posts
    1,599

    Default Re: Full contact bridges

    Last year, I had Big Joe refret my '02 F5 Fern. I was concerned about a little indention in the top that I thought could turn into a crack over time. It was right at the inside bass side foot was. There was a little burr on the foot on the bottom that pressed in a little more, thus the indention. Joe suggested that the factory fix was to install a full contact bridge on it. They refit my bridge into a full contact one. At first it sounded a little different. But over time I can't really tell the difference. I think it settled back into it's old sound. So, overall, I don't think it made much difference. Anytime you change the bridge or move it, or take it off, or whatever, there will be a change. But It's difficult for me to tell any long term difference between these two. I think there was more change in sound between the old KM-1000 bridge top (saddle) I had on it before and the newer Cumberland Acoustics top that is on it now. Since the wood all stayed the same with the re-fit job. Maybe that's why the sound stayed more the same.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •