Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 45

Thread: What is your preference, and why?

  1. #1

    Default

    Just curious. I could probably get myself used to either way, just wondering what the argument would be either way.

    Or, what the majority of you all do. Would be neat if we could do a poll. Maybe somebody knows how to do that.

  2. #2
    Registered User Doug Hoople's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wellington, NZ
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    My f-style came with one, a beautiful bound ebony pickguard. I took it off while taking a classical mandolin lesson and it started buzzing. Ironically, part of the lesson was to demonstrate picking with a loosely closed fist, with no pinky planting and no referencing a pickguard, both disallowed to gain freedom in other ways.

    I've left the pickguard off since and learned my lesson well... there are no marks on the finish where the pickguard was.

    I'm getting my next mandolin made without one.

    My $0.02, that's all. The only rule to follow here is to get at least one lesson with a good classical mandolin teacher.
    Doug Hoople
    Adult-onset Instrumentalist (or was that addled-onset?)

  3. #3

    Default

    I couldn't see it being worth much other than getting in the way. They can be purdy though.
    Join me Thursdays from 10am - 12pm eastern as I host "The Bluegrass Beat" at www.worldwidebluegrass.com.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New York NY
    Posts
    570

    Default

    To have one is a small price to pay for protection of an expensive investment.

    It not only protects from abrasive forces applied to the finish but it also prevents skin oil build-up in the area protected.

  5. #5

    Default

    I ask because my new mando came without 1, and as far as I can tell, I would never hit the finish while playing. Just wondering if they are more cosmetic?

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    NE Ohio
    Posts
    334

    Default

    They are quite functional, not just cosmetic. Very protective, many players constantly plant a finger on the top of the instrument while playing. Constant abrasive action going on. It becomes a personal thing. I like to look at them on other players instruments, but, I dislike them on my own. I'll take the little scratches, just looks good to have the "worn in" look to me.
    Richard Russell

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    victoria, canada
    Posts
    3,514

    Default

    First off, they are not pickguards. Pickguards are what you see on an acoustic guitar, affixed to the top for exactly that purpose - to protect the top from the pick.

    On a mandolin, while they're often called a pickguard, they are actually finger rests. Some people, myself included, base their right hand technique around it. My fingers brush lightly across it most of the time, sometimes I'll put them down for an instant for greater stability. An passage requiring intricate pick movement, for example. The rest of the time, I'm using it as a sort of guage, to help me keep my pick in a consistent position.

    I guess there are some players whose right hand approach is ferocious enough that they could damage the top, but I really think that is pretty rare. The two main reasons for having one would be either to use as a aid for the right hand or just because of the way it looks.

    There is also an ongoing debate about whether or not they affect tone and volume.

  8. #8
    Registered User John Flynn's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Richmond, VA
    Posts
    8,076

    Default

    I like the looks of them, but I don't have them on my mandolins. I feel they encourage me to post my fingers, which I have mostly cured myself of. Also, I have never put a pick scratch on mandolin, so they don't really serve a function for me. Finally, I have also had them cause buzzes. I personally don't think they have any adverse effect on tone or volume, though.

  9. #9
    Destroyer of Mandolins
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    5,017

    Default

    I've never needed one, as I don't plant my fingers and a don't get close to the wood with the pick. I like the look on an F style where it adds to the pleasing shape, but I don't like the look on an A style where is detracts from the symmetry. My bowlback has an inlaid wooden pickguard, but I don't understand the sense of it.
    Dedicated Ovation player
    Avid Bose user

  10. #10
    Registered User Doug Hoople's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wellington, NZ
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (jk245 @ Feb. 23 2008, 12:31)
    It not only protects from abrasive forces applied to the finish but it also prevents skin oil build-up in the area protected.
    What skin oils will build up? Mine have none.
    Doug Hoople
    Adult-onset Instrumentalist (or was that addled-onset?)

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    659

    Default

    I prefer no pick guard. I don't like the way a pickguard looks. If I hit the finish, so be it.
    Collings MT
    Weber Gallatin Mandocello

    Language is the armory of the human mind, and at once contains the trophies of its past and the weapons of its future conquests. -Samuel Taylor Coleridge

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Arizona
    Posts
    642

    Default

    Whether you plant or not if you always pick parallel to the strings as you should and do not pick toward the body of the instrument you don't need a pick guard. #The problem is that not everyone knows that or cares. We had a post recently of a youtube vid with someone trying out a brand new bowlback mandolin who was whacking the inlaid pickguard about every third stroke. #It was annoying to listen to and if the guard hadn't been there he would have made the top look like the one on old Bill's Loar in no time. If you're like old Bill and you don't care, fine. For the rest of us, I suggest leaving the pickguard on!




  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Boston West
    Posts
    591

    Default

    I have seen quite a few really fine instruments with gouged out bare spots from fingernails of the picking hand. I suppose it gives the instrument some battle scars character, like Willie Nelson's 'Trigger'(a severe case)but it seems destructive to me. More importantly, if you lend your pride and joy to another picker to try, you may be non-plussed at what a fingernail can do in a few minutes.

  14. #14
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,117

    Default

    Ist Mando I owned had one onit , so i miss absence of one.

    It's a picker's depth guage, rather than a pinky planation.

    the fingernail slides easily over it.

    For my F, I had the one I got from C.A. installed sloping down a bit,
    rather than a continuation of the plane of the strings.


    so its not in the way either when not functionally handy.



    and someplace to park your chewing gum.
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  15. #15
    Registered User 300win's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    1,507
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default

    I've never had a mando with one on it. But I'm a finger planter, and all the mandolins I've had had the tell-tale sign of that to some extent. Of course I've never owned a real good mandolin until recently when I got a Gibson A-9, and my picking has worn through the very thin finish on this mando. I tried some clear tape for a while, but took it off, what I've donne is put a small dab of clear poly there to keep from wearing through the wood. I've ordered a armrest to go on my mandolin and I think that might help as the Gibson has a higher arch than any of the pos mandolins I've had before, so in my way of picking that is making me plant my fingers a little heavier than ever before. My thinking is the armrest will raise my hand up a little and reposition it. I don't think I could use a pick-gaurd, and not sure if I would like the looks of one on my mandolin.

  16. #16
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    victoria, canada
    Posts
    3,514

    Default

    I just got an armrest from Doug Edwards and I can't say enough about the benefits of using the combination of it and the finger rest to help keep my pick in the optimal position and allow my right hand to move freely but with more stability. I've had to do a bit of retraining to learn this technique, but it's really making an improvement.

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    New York NY
    Posts
    570

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (300win @ Feb. 23 2008, 15:12)
    I've never had a mando with one on it. But I'm a finger planter, and all the mandolins I've had had the tell-tale sign of that to some extent. Of course I've never owned a real good mandolin until recently when I got a Gibson A-9, and my picking has worn through the very thin finish on this mando.
    Quite surprising the Gibson A9 and A5 come standard without the pickguard, while the lower price Flatiron Festival has it.
    The discontinued Gibson A5L, at a higher price than an A5, had the pickguard. The guard for the A5L should fit the A9 and A5 because they are basically the same size instruments with different ornamentation.

  18. #18
    Mike Parks woodwizard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Knoxville (Piney Bay) Arkansas
    Posts
    2,966

    Default

    I prefer a pickguard. I'm just use to one I guess and mine's one of those smaller abriviated ones so I think it looks pretty cool. In the old days of Gibson I think they called them finger rests but currently they are calling them pickgurards. I think they are both and I like the extra protection just in case. There is no difference in the tone or volume as far as I can tell with or without. My Goldrush is a banjo killer either way. Very loud and great Gibson tone.



    I Pick, Therefore I Grin! ... "Good Music Any OLD-TIME"

    1922 Gibson F2
    2006 Gibson F5 Goldrush
    2015 Martin HD28-V
    2017 Gibson J45

  19. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    victoria, canada
    Posts
    3,514

    Default

    <In the old days of Gibson I think they called them finger rests but currently they are calling them pickgurards.>

    Pickguard seems to be the word most people choose, and it's hard to fight common usage. When I was in grade school there was actually a saying: "aint" aint in the dictionary. Well, it's there now and has been for a long time.

    But if you think about it, we're talking about a pick crossing the E string and then dipping down a good inch or more to make contact with the top. Who plays that way?

  20. #20

    Default

    They's UGLY!

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Las Vegas, NV
    Posts
    957

    Default

    I prefer no pickguard. Both my Eastmans and Fullerton came that way. I gave up finger planting after about 6 months of playing. I find that it restricts my wrist, especially for tremelo and decreased the volume. Instead I let the back of part of my palm brush against the back of the bridge.



    Glenn Nelson
    Las Vegas, NV

    "Every day brings a chance for you to draw in a breath, kick off your shoes and play your mandolin."

  22. #22
    Registered User Doug Hoople's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Wellington, NZ
    Posts
    1,140

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (mandolirius @ Feb. 23 2008, 19:17)
    <In the old days of Gibson I think they called them finger rests but currently they are calling them pickgurards.>

    Pickguard seems to be the word most people choose, and it's hard to fight common usage. When I was in grade school there was actually a saying: "aint" aint in the dictionary. Well, it's there now and has been for a long time.

    But if you think about it, we're talking about a pick crossing the E string and then dipping down a good inch or more to make contact with the top. Who plays that way?
    They're called a finger rest for a reason. The primary thing people do is plant their pinky. The other thing people do is play with their non-picking fingers splayed out, in which case they can also brush against the finish. The finger rest protects against both these habits.

    I used to plant my pinky pretty persistently, and my first mandolin has a circular splotch from the sweat acids where I wore the finish through from planting. Not very pretty, but it was an entry-level mando, so no great loss.
    Doug Hoople
    Adult-onset Instrumentalist (or was that addled-onset?)

  23. #23
    Registered User chip's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Carmel Valley
    Posts
    798

    Default

    Sometimes I'm tempted to take it off one of my F5's. I like to take good care of my things so I feel that it's probably better to keep them on and protect the instrument.
    There's really no reason to attempt scratching something as nice as a handmade instrument so I don't take the chance. I have an A model that doesn't have one so I guess that will suffice for the time being. If anything I think I'll put one on the other side too....

  24. #24
    Registurd User pjlama's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Los Ranchos De Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    1,896

    Default

    No. Because I neither plant nor scratch and as was stated earlier, theys ugly.
    PJ
    Stanley V5

  25. #25
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default

    If it is part of the instrument when it was made I leave it, if the instrument is made without one, and doesn't have one, I leave it.

    I don't want to get into a pinky plant or don't plant thread, because its never ending, and everyone is right. I happen to plant, not always but enough. I plant with a pick guard, I plant without a pick guard. No different.

    I also don't obsess over the change in finish my fingers, or pick even, might make - I want my instrument to show the idiosynracies of my playing.

    I also don't think pickguards (finger rests, I even heard it called a scratch plate once) make much, if any difference in the sound. If the instrument came with, I assume that the sound it makes with is the sound the luthier intended, and I am the last person to second guess a luthier. Like a french horn is designed to be played with the left hand in the bell.

    And they look cool.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

Similar Threads

  1. If you had your preference
    By thistle3585 in forum Four, Five and Eight-String Electrics
    Replies: 3
    Last: Sep-27-2005, 12:17am
  2. Pickup preference?
    By Mastersound in forum Four, Five and Eight-String Electrics
    Replies: 20
    Last: Feb-15-2004, 6:03pm

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •