Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

  1. #1
    Registered User Tavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tavistock UK
    Posts
    4,456

    Default Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    So... a bit of history here, some time ago I was commissioned to produce a pair of electric travel mandolins which were designed to fit inside a specific luggage size and of course, weigh as little as possible. By using the Gotoh Stealth tuners I not only saved weight, but was also able to shrink the headstock size - ideal!

    Fast forward a few years, and unnoticed I now see that Gotoh have discontinued the Stealth's

    Does anyone know of anything similar? Or at least small and light? A full set of 8 Stealth's were about 90g, where as most 4-on-a-plate designs are at least double that. BTW not only did the Stealths reduce overall weight, but they also improved the instrument's overall balance no end.

    For posterity, here's the first of the travel mandolins I made, it's just 21x10" overall, and I don't see how I can do that with regular tuners, from memory I think I saved a good 1/2" length from using the Stealths... doesn't sound much but it was the difference between fitting the luggage or not.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	small-DSCF5686.JPG 
Views:	137 
Size:	280.5 KB 
ID:	206335

  2. #2

    Default Re: Lightest/Sallest machine heads?

    The model seems to be available in sets of 6 for guitar. Not dimensionally ok for mando? Also note large variety in other individual types, no weights given.
    Anyway- striking mandolin! From whence the wood, and how the finish?

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Halifax, Yorkshire, England
    Posts
    235

    Default Re: Lightest/Sallest machine heads?

    I have a Paul Shippey 'tone' mandolin with the Stealths fitted. UK makers seem to nearly always install the standard individual Gotohs which add weight and unbalances the mandolin, rather than the strip tuners I prefer - I blame Sobell for starting this trend. I once failed to persuade a well-known UK maker (not Sobell) to use strip tuners, which I offered to supply, on a new build. He refused as it would 'spoil the aesthetics of his design'. I suspect he did not want the bother of making a new installation jig.
    Anglocelt
    mainly Irish & Scottish but open to all dance-oriented melodic music.
    Mandos: Gibson A2, Janish A5, Krishot F5, Taran Springwell, Shippey, Weber Elite A5; TM and OM by Dave Gregory, J E Dallas, Tobin & Davidson.

  4. #4
    Registered User Tavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tavistock UK
    Posts
    4,456

    Default Re: Lightest/Sallest machine heads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Richard500 View Post
    The model seems to be available in sets of 6 for guitar.
    It *was*, but as I said, it's been discontinued: https://g-gotoh.com/product/st31/?lang=en

    Not dimensionally ok for mando? Also note large variety in other individual types, no weights given.
    Anyway- striking mandolin! From whence the wood, and how the finish?
    Top is spruce with Golden Madrone overlay. Satin EnduroVar finish - gloss would have been silly on a travel instrument.

  5. #5
    Registered User Tavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tavistock UK
    Posts
    4,456

    Default Re: Lightest/Sallest machine heads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Anglocelt View Post
    I have a Paul Shippey 'tone' mandolin with the Stealths fitted. UK makers seem to nearly always install the standard individual Gotohs which add weight and unbalances the mandolin, rather than the strip tuners I prefer - I blame Sobell for starting this trend. I once failed to persuade a well-known UK maker (not Sobell) to use strip tuners, which I offered to supply, on a new build. He refused as it would 'spoil the aesthetics of his design'. I suspect he did not want the bother of making a new installation jig.
    I hear you. The individual tuners are cheap, dead easy to install, and work really well... certainly much better than your average 4-on-a-plate, but yes, so much heavier. The great thing about the Stealth's was that they were about half the weight again as 4-on-plate.

  6. #6
    Registered User sunburst's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Kentucky
    Posts
    15,888

    Default Re: Lightest/Sallest machine heads?

    So many times I find out about a product, try it and like it, and then it becomes unavailable. This time I get to skip at least one step; I find out about a product and it is already unavailable before I even get to try it!

  7. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to sunburst For This Useful Post:


  8. #7
    Registered User Charles E.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Saint Augustine Beach FL
    Posts
    6,649

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    Just curious, what made the Gotoh "stealth" tuners so lightweight? Thinner plates? Titanium Plates?
    Charley

    A bunch of stuff with four strings

  9. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    They’re tiny and I think the bodies were made of some form of glass reinforced plastic. A local, now retired, luthier, Ged Green, once showed me a set and told me that they were meant to be built into a headstock. Never actually seen them in use but I’ve always imagined that they weren’t durable enough (too lightweight) to simply screw on the back of a headstock.

  10. #9
    Registered User Tavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tavistock UK
    Posts
    4,456

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles E. View Post
    Just curious, what made the Gotoh "stealth" tuners so lightweight? Thinner plates? Titanium Plates?
    Mostly their size, they were just 11g each BTW:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	small-DSCF5696.JPG 
Views:	97 
Size:	292.3 KB 
ID:	206349

    A local, now retired, luthier, Ged Green, once showed me a set and told me that they were meant to be built into a headstock.
    Gotoh advertised that as something you *could* do, but I've never seen anyone actually do it, and to be honest the string posts were too long for that anyway IMO.

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    Brisbane, Australia
    Posts
    200

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Tavy View Post
    Mostly their size, they were just 11g each BTW:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	small-DSCF5696.JPG 
Views:	97 
Size:	292.3 KB 
ID:	206349



    Gotoh advertised that as something you *could* do, but I've never seen anyone actually do it, and to be honest the string posts were too long for that anyway IMO.
    Ken Parker did, when he used them.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	images.jpg 
Views:	96 
Size:	5.5 KB 
ID:	206350  

  12. #11
    Confused... or?
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Over the Hudson & thru the woods from NYC
    Posts
    2,933

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles E. View Post
    ... what made the Gotoh "stealth" tuners so lightweight?
    Looking at their spec drawing, the worm is maybe 1/3 the diameter of "normal"; the outside diameter of the (hidden) worm is clearly smaller than the o.d. of the tuning shaft. Make the gear correspondingly thinner and you're free to shrink the housing. But I'd be suspicious of the longevity of such a tiny worm-on-cog bearing surface. Also, no photos show the bottom of the mounting plate; suspect that it's open to allow both lightness and clearance under the worm?
    - Ed

    "Then one day we weren't as young as before
    Our mistakes weren't quite so easy to undo
    But by all those roads, my friend, we've travelled down
    I'm a better man for just the knowin' of you."
    - Ian Tyson

  13. #12
    Registered User amowry's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    2,168

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    I don't believe the plates were open on the inside. I used them on a ten string several years ago and they worked fine, though I was a bit suspect of longevity too. They also had a bit more backlash than I like to see. I sure hope they last, if they're irreplaceable now!

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	88.jpg 
Views:	41 
Size:	94.9 KB 
ID:	206396

  14. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Lightest/Smallest machine heads?

    As I’ve often said, “Life is only temporary.”.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •