Considering moving on from my Kentucky KM-900. Do you guys think the Northfield M is a worthy step up? I'm looking for a less dry, sweeter tone. Will be used mainly for recording.
Price of a new M is right in my range. Thanks.
Roger
Considering moving on from my Kentucky KM-900. Do you guys think the Northfield M is a worthy step up? I'm looking for a less dry, sweeter tone. Will be used mainly for recording.
Price of a new M is right in my range. Thanks.
Roger
My experience with Northfields is that the do lend themselves to a more modern, sweet tone with plenty of punch and “bones” in the notes. Their build quality is also top notch, and as a small company, they are wonderful to deal with. I doubt you’d be going wrong with a model M.
If your Kentucky is a particularly incredible specimen, well, YMMV
I think you will find the NFM to be the superior mandolin in every way. Fit, finish, playability, intonation and setup will be nearly flawless. As mentioned above the tone between the two instruments will be quite different. I feel the model M is the more versatile tone and no Kentucky I've owned or played (a lot of 'em) can match a good sounding Gibson. So unless you're a hardcore bluegrass player I'd say go with the NF model M. If you can play them both the proof will be in the pickin'...
Every Northfield I've played has sounded really good, but each is unique and every player is look )listening?) for something different. I'd play before I'd buy, but sight unseen would choose a Northfield over a Kentucky every day.
Perhaps a Zeta would be appropriate for recording.
Not all the clams are at the beach
Arrow Manouche
Arrow Jazzbo
Arrow G
Clark 2 point
Gibson F5L
Gibson A-4
Ratliff CountryBoy A
I've had both Northfield and KM-900, and can agree that the Northfield has a much more complex and modern tone than the Kentucky. While I don't have any of them anymore, I do wish I had kept one of the KM-900. It's a well-made mandolin with a very strong voice, and especially considering what I got them for at the time (almost a third of what the Model-M went for). All I'm trying to say is: Yes the Northfield will be a wonderful upgrade, but don't let go of that Kentucky just yet. You may regret it one day.
Well if you figure price plays into the tone quality-why ask the question? if not well then.......... I have a KM950; Ive had much more expensive mandos, but I think the bang for the buck can't be beat for the 950. YMMV and its only my opinion....
Thanks
Several mandolins of varying quality-any one of which deserves a better player than I am.......
My experience with the two brands...
I've played 3 Northfields, all of them were extremely wonderful instruments that were well set up to play smooth like butter.
Of the hand full of higher end Kentuckys ($1000 and up) some were wonderful instruments and some just weren't. Some sounded thin, some were a little clunky, etc. One km606 (well under a thousand) that I should have pulled the trigger on still kinda haunts me.
Thanks for the responses. Truth be told, I almost forgot that I started this thread.
I've only played one KM900, and that's mine. So not sure how it rates among several. Very dry, strong fundamentals, cuts through an arrangement very well, but a little thin sounding. I don't know for sure, but I'm guessing it's suited more for bluegrass. I like bluegrass, but I'm not a bluegrass player. Sweet, is not a descriptor I would apply to it.
I really appreciate the feedback. Now if I could only find an NF M to play.
Bookmarks