Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 27 of 27

Thread: Better tone with light strings?

  1. #26
    Notary Sojac Paul Kotapish's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Alameda, California
    Posts
    2,442

    Default Re: Better tone with light strings?

    For me, it all depends on the circumstances/setting of where I'm playing the instrument. If it's mostly around home or in a small ensemble, I like the way light-gauge strings feel and sound, plus I feel like I get a little more expression and sustain from the lighter tension. The trade-off is that if I hit the lighter strings too hard, the sound tends to break up under my ham fist. Most of the time (or at least most-of-the-once-upon-a-time) I'm playing in a bigger, louder band, and I want the extra cut and chop I get with the medium/heavy set.
    Just one guy's opinion
    www.guitarfish.net

  2. The following members say thank you to Paul Kotapish for this post:


  3. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    3,926

    Default Re: Better tone with light strings?

    On heavier built instruments I think J75 gauged strings do make a noticeable and generally + difference. I also like 75s on my Silverangel, which is what Ken recommends. But, it sounded good with 74s (and not much of a noticeable difference in volume or tone), whereas my old Kentucky 675-S really needed the heavier strings to drive the top. A recent Eastman 315 I sold did well with either gauge, and I like 74s enough on my Skip Kelley and my Rigel that I haven’t tried others yet. So, yeah, it depends on the instrument, and also your playing style/situation...
    Chuck

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •