-
Derek Callaway
-
-
Easily Distracted
Re: Choice of wood for ribs?
Choose aesthetically. For one thing, you'll probably break or damage the set you want to use unless you have a lot of experience. For another, as long as they're 1.5mm or thicker, you have plenty of structure to work with regardless of the grain direction. Bending is somewhat complicated by runout, but it's curly maple. Always going to be an issue. Work with what you've got.
-
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Marty Jacobson For This Useful Post:
-
Re: Choice of wood for ribs?
Both will look nice under a finish.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Choice of wood for ribs?
Either set is lovely, and Marty's advice re probable breakage is very apposite. When I have bent maple I use a thin nickel plate (from my railway modelling past) which I wrap around the rib while bending, making a sandwich of bending iron, maple and nickel sheet. This helps a bit with reducing the chance of breakage and I found it gave me a smoother curve.
-
-
Registered User
Re: Choice of wood for ribs?
I strongly favor the lower one in the picture; the narrower one.
Why?
-It has plenty of figure that will show up under a finish, the grain runs straight through the piece, and it is exactly "quartered" (vertical grain).
From my experience of making things out of wood for over 40 years, that will look like a better structural piece to my eye. In fact, the structural difference would be insignificant, but looking better structurally translates to "better" to my eye.
-Maple tends to be easier to bend when it is exactly 'quartered' or exactly 'flat'. When the annual rings angle through the wood it has more tendency to twist when bent, so I think the piece I prefer would probably bend more easily than the other.
-
The following members say thank you to sunburst for this post:
-
Derek Callaway
Re: Choice of wood for ribs?
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
Bookmarks