Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Bridge sizes vs tone

  1. #1
    Registered User John Bertotti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SD
    Posts
    3,658

    Default Bridge sizes vs tone

    The question, can anyone tell me how bridge base length and or bridge base width affect tone?

    Thanks!
    My avatar is of my OldWave Oval A

    Creativity is just doing something wierd and finding out others like it.

  2. #2
    Mandolin tragic Graham McDonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    I think most experienced builders would agree that the length and width of a mandolin bridge will effect the tone, but I suspect that no-one has done enough, if any, experimental work to have any real conclusions. The bridge will add mass and cross-grain stiffness to the soundboard. This may, or may not be a good thing.

    Cheers

  3. The following members say thank you to Graham McDonald for this post:


  4. #3
    Registered User John Bertotti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SD
    Posts
    3,658

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    Might be a future experiment. I always wondered how we came upon the current adjustable bridge and why it is the size it is.
    My avatar is of my OldWave Oval A

    Creativity is just doing something wierd and finding out others like it.

  5. #4
    Mandolin tragic Graham McDonald's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Canberra, Australia
    Posts
    1,645

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    The Gibson adjustable bridge makes a lot of sense in a production environment such as Gibson in the early 20s. Mandolins, mandolas and guitars were always going to come off the production line with slightly different neck angles and different required bridge heights. Being able to adjust the bridge height with a few turns of a couple of knurled wheels is a lot easier than having to adjust the height of a one piece bridge by sanding or other non-reversible activities. One of the interesting outcomes is that the tonal qualities of the Gibson style adjustable bridge has become the expected standard of the carved top, f-hole mandolin rather than any other style of bridge.

  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    S.W. Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,526

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    While I am not sure about size comparison, weight comparison on the other hand does make a difference. So if larger size adds weight it may be a negative thing. Of course mandolins vary with what they need to sound good. Some may like a larger, heavier bridge. Some like a thicker pick, some a thinner one. It would be a complicated test.
    THE WORLD IS A BETTER PLACE JUST FOR YOUR SMILE!

  7. #6

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    I think most builders would agree that you need these three things:

    - Sufficient stiffness (whatever that means)
    - Adequately fit bridge base (whatever that means)
    - Minimal mass (whatever that means)
    - Action which is not too high or too low
    - Proper intonation

    Everything else, like adjustability, are details which do not impact tone, as long as you have a "stiff, light bridge which is well fit, allows for good action, and plays in tune".

    I made some faithful reproductions of the old Gibson aluminum bridge tops a few years ago. A few folks installed them and said they liked them. I haven't installed one myself. They are light, not as light as maple though, and exceedingly stiff.

    A insufficiently stiff bridge, or a too-heavy bridge, or possibly a poorly-fit bridge will act like a low-pass filter (reducing high-frequency harmonic content).

    A bridge cannot add anything which isn't already there in the wood/geometry/air/strings as system.

  8. The following members say thank you to Marty Jacobson for this post:


  9. #7
    Registered User John Bertotti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SD
    Posts
    3,658

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    Quote Originally Posted by Marty Jacobson View Post
    I think most builders would agree that you need these three things:

    - Sufficient stiffness (whatever that means)
    - Adequately fit bridge base (whatever that means)
    - Minimal mass (whatever that means)
    - Action which is not too high or too low
    - Proper intonation

    Everything else, like adjustability, are details which do not impact tone, as long as you have a "stiff, light bridge which is well fit, allows for good action, and plays in tune".

    I made some faithful reproductions of the old Gibson aluminum bridge tops a few years ago. A few folks installed them and said they liked them. I haven't installed one myself. They are light, not as light as maple though, and exceedingly stiff.

    A insufficiently stiff bridge, or a too-heavy bridge, or possibly a poorly-fit bridge will act like a low-pass filter (reducing high-frequency harmonic content).

    A bridge cannot add anything which isn't already there in the wood/geometry/air/strings as system.
    Has anyone tried a bridge of CF? Stiff and light, I have considered going to a one piece bridge. I seem to have a good hold on the humirity of this mandolin and don't think that height adjustments will be needed. Actualy since getting it I think I have adjusted it once, that would cover a span of around 11 years.
    My avatar is of my OldWave Oval A

    Creativity is just doing something wierd and finding out others like it.

  10. #8
    Mandolin user MontanaMatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    1,252

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    Quote Originally Posted by John Bertotti View Post
    Has anyone tried a bridge of CF? Stiff and light, I have considered going to a one piece bridge. I seem to have a good hold on the humirity of this mandolin and don't think that height adjustments will be needed. Actualy since getting it I think I have adjusted it once, that would cover a span of around 11 years.
    I have to adjust my bridges twice a year...if I don't the action buzzes in the summer. Up in the spring, down in the fall.
    Must be the altitude mixing with the cold winters?
    2007 Weber Custom Elite "old wood"
    2017 Ratliff R5 Custom #1148
    Several nice old Fiddles
    2007 Martin 000-15S 12 fret Auditorium-slot head
    Deering Classic Open Back
    Too many microphones

    BridgerCreekBoys.com

  11. #9
    Registered User John Bertotti's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    SD
    Posts
    3,658

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMatt View Post
    I have to adjust my bridges twice a year...if I don't the action buzzes in the summer. Up in the spring, down in the fall.
    Must be the altitude mixing with the cold winters?
    I keep an oasis in my case in the winter so I try to keep it humidified year round to eliminate that variation. In the case all the time as soon as the humidity gets below 40% here. This year I was down below 25% in my house, at its worse, even with a humidifier running, a big console humidifier that holds 5 gallons. I had to fill it every used about three gallons every 12 hours. All those weeks in single digits down to -35 + temps really takes its toll. I hope to have a cabinet built to keep all my instrumewnts in this winter so I can control the humidity in one spot only.
    My avatar is of my OldWave Oval A

    Creativity is just doing something wierd and finding out others like it.

  12. #10

    Default Re: Bridge sizes vs tone

    Several of my mandolins have CF saddles. It doesn't sound any different from what I can tell. I'm pretty sure it'll never break, though!

    CF is actually not particularly light, at twice the density of ebony. You can just make things a lot smaller, so you can get away with less mass if you design it correctly. A real, full-CF bridge of optimal thickness is so thin that you can't intonate it! It's thinner than a violin bridge. Mine are encased in wood so they have a traditional appearance.

  13. The following members say thank you to Marty Jacobson for this post:


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •