Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

  1. #1
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    I have a beautiful Bruce Weber signed Bozeman built Flatiron A-5. To me it is an absolute dynamite mandolin - also happens to look like new. I seem to have a bug to look at Northfield's Artist series. Flatirons seem to be an incredible mandolin for the money. Are modern mandolins, such as Northfield, truly that much different - especially considering the cost? Anyone actually own a Flatiron AND a Northfield that might share their opinion of the two? Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

  2. #2

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    Different? Probably. Better? Totally subjective.

    Is there some huge breakthrough since your flatiron was built? Not that I know of.

    Looking for justification? You came to the right place.

    I've liked the few Flatirons I've played. I've liked all the Northridges I've played too.

    You need to take your mandolin to a store and play side by side. Can't do that? Buy a Northfield and use the return policy.
    Silverangel A
    Arches F style kit
    1913 Gibson A-1

  3. #3
    Timothy Tim Logan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2017
    Location
    Shutesbury, MA
    Posts
    664

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    Thank you Brick!

  4. #4
    Mando accumulator allenhopkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rochester NY 14610
    Posts
    17,378

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    I would call a Flatiron built in the 1980's a "modern" mandolin. Since then, there may be increased use of computerized carving to perform the initial shaping of mandolin components, but a high-quality mandolin will have the final work done by a craftsperson experienced in mandolin luthiery.

    What has often surprised me is the quality of instruments turned out by larger factories a century ago, when dozens -- hundreds -- of workers made mandolins under one roof, largely or entirely by hand, and produced instruments we still hold up as the standard for construction, appearance, and sound. Impressive in retrospect.
    Allen Hopkins
    Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
    Natl Triolian Dobro mando
    Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
    H-O mandolinetto
    Stradolin Vega banjolin
    Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
    Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
    Flatiron 3K OM

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to allenhopkins For This Useful Post:


  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    2,573

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    Quote Originally Posted by allenhopkins View Post
    I would call a Flatiron built in the 1980's a "modern" mandolin. Since then, there may be increased use of computerized carving to perform the initial shaping of mandolin components, but a high-quality mandolin will have the final work done by a craftsperson experienced in mandolin luthiery.
    What has often surprised me is the quality of instruments turned out by larger factories a century ago, when dozens -- hundreds -- otf workers made mandolins under one roof, largely or entirely by hand, and produced instruments we still hold up as the standard for construction, appearance, and sound. Impressive in retrospect.
    Kind of goes against the conventional thinking that we can do everything better with computers.

  7. The following members say thank you to Mandoplumb for this post:


  8. #6
    Registered User almeriastrings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Almeria, Spain
    Posts
    5,448
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    I had a 2001 (Nashville-built) Flatiron and Northfield at the same time.

    Both EXCELLENT mandolins, but 'voicing' was different. The Flatiron was closer to my Gibson F5's than the Northfield - but as others have said, you really have to try them. It is 100% down to personal preference. Both very high quality instruments.
    Gibson F5 'Harvey' Fern, Gibson F5 'Derrington' Fern
    Distressed Silverangel F 'Esmerelda' aka 'Maxx'
    Northfield Big Mon #127
    Ellis F5 Special #288
    '39 & '45 D-18's, 1950 D-28.

  9. #7
    Fingers of Concrete ccravens's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Crockett, TX
    Posts
    1,058

    Default Re: From Bozeman Flatirons to current mandolin technology

    Quote Originally Posted by almeriastrings View Post
    I had a 2001 (Nashville-built) Flatiron and Northfield at the same time.

    Both EXCELLENT mandolins, but 'voicing' was different. The Flatiron was closer to my Gibson F5's than the Northfield - but as others have said, you really have to try them. It is 100% down to personal preference. Both very high quality instruments.
    IOW, since the voicing of each is different, you need one of each.
    Chris Cravens

    Girouard A5
    Montana Flatiron A-Jr.
    Passernig Mandola
    Leo Posch D-18

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to ccravens For This Useful Post:

    Br1cksoliver 

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •