Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 29 of 29

Thread: Full-contact bridges: New standard?

  1. #26
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    Pacific NW, slightly outside BC
    Posts
    657

    Default Re: Full-contact bridges: New standard?

    I'm going to have to try a FC, in fact my interest was piqued by the new Silverangel super full contact or whatever you want to call it: https://www.mandolincafe.com/ads/125430#125430

    in the banjo world it's common for people to have dozens of bridges at 1/32" increments and measure them in tenths of grams tho the older 70's ultra thin bridges have gone out of fashion, they were too bright and didn't last long. And yeah 2 bridges from the same maker that are .2 grams different sound different
    The Keepers: Kentucky km900, looking for next one
    Yamaha piano, clarinet, violin
    Stage1 pedal steel, some banjos and a dobro don't get played too much

    Shopping/monitoring prices: Yamaha brass, single/double reeds

  2. #27

    Default Re: Full-contact bridges: New standard?

    Check out the Brekke Bridge from Bridger Products. Full contact and vibration transferred by ebony height adjusted wedges.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	DSCF0200 (1).jpg 
Views:	81 
Size:	435.2 KB 
ID:	168349

  3. #28
    Masamando Steve Hinde's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    New Hartford, IA
    Posts
    341

    Default Re: Full-contact bridges: New standard?

    I use full contact bridges to reduce bridge saddle bending from string load. The center space is weaker. So the load causes the saddle to deflect, causing the posts to rotate towards the center, resulting in the 2 feet digging into the top. All depends on the wood in the saddle how tight the holes are in the saddle and the hardness of the top to reduce the risk of digging in. Almost every 2 foot bridge I have seen shows the issue. I did say almost. Again depends if the base and top are strong enough and the adjustment posts are not loose in the holes. No chance of that with a full contact bridge. I do believe the 2 foot bridge increases volume. I attribute that to surface area contact. I make my bases a bit shorter to get the same advantage. But not so short to come off of the bass bar. It is a bit difficult to put a full contact on a mando that has the damage and get a good fit.

  4. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Nashville
    Posts
    4,922

    Default Re: Full-contact bridges: New standard?

    Each mandolin is different from any other. They are really not one size fits all. On some the two foot works better, on others the full contact. In addition to that, a perfect fit is just as important and the saddle radiused to match your fingerboard. To some degree itís a personal choice, but donít approach it with 5he idea that one thing alone will make a big difference. It may, but it may not be the one you hoped for. Lots of things go into setting up and adjusting a mandolin for optimal tone and power. Itís a mixture of many things that when done right will astound you.
    Have a Great Day!
    Joe Vest

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Big Joe For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •