Re: Studying Bill Monroe

Originally Posted by
LongBlackVeil
I find myself wanting to emulate Grisman and Statman more than Bill Monroe.
So I have a 2 part question here. Do you believe there is truth to what Andy says here.
I think it is hard to be inspired by something if it fundamentally does not "grab" you. I think it is probably even harder to study it systematically, seriously and effectively. Now... for myself, I love Monroe's style. Always have. Always will. So for me, studying it is no hardship at all... but if someone came along and said you have to study, say, Andy Statman's style, or Jesse McReynolds style, or that guy who keeps winning the IBMA mandolin player of the year award's style
I would find that much harder to do. Not because these are not all FANTASTICALLY talented players.... they are all superb in their own ways, but simply because their sound and style does not move me like Monroe's music does. Put another way, Monroe is not for everyone, any more than say, John Reischman is for everyone... and if a player does not 'fire you up' to the extent you HAVE to dive deep into their style, learning it could be a real chore.
You can probably still pick up bits and pieces from other players, other styles, but to immerse yourself in something, I do feel that has to come from deep within yourself, and not just because someone (anyone) says you should.
Personally, I would take a relaxed view on this and listen to and play the music YOU like in the way YOU want to. That's really what matters.. I know enough classical players who tell of horror stories about being literally forced to listen to and play stuff they don't really 'get' to say that kind of situation is worth avoiding. It can take all the pleasure and fun out of it.
Gibson F5 'Harvey' Fern, Gibson F5 'Derrington' Fern
Distressed Silverangel F 'Esmerelda' aka 'Maxx'
Northfield Big Mon #127
Ellis F5 Special #288
'39 & '45 D-18's, 1950 D-28.
Bookmarks