Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Floyd rose (or other) for mandolin.

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    199

    Default

    This is something that I've been struggling with for a little while, ever since I got my Schwab 5-string, and especially with my Mann SEM-5, which has slightly lighter strings and tends to go out of tune on the C string a bit faster.

    I refuse to give up on 5-strings. They're the bridge between rock and mandolin, and I can't play a guitar anywhere near as well as I can the mandolin. That said, retuning is a pain in the neck.

    Is there any record (or any direct knowledge) of someone using a locking nut system on a mandolin? Is there such a thing for the mandolin at all?

    One more question: does a product exist that either functions as a locking nut, or is intended as such, that doesn't require drilling into the neck of the instrument?
    Schwab 5-string No.29 (1982)
    Old Wave C# No.311 (2003)
    Mann SEM-5 No. 60 (2007)

  2. #2

    Default

    I had one put on a modified Eastwood after having a whammy bar installed on it. This one was originally on a guitar, and adapted for four strings, but probably could also work for five.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Slide1.jpg 
Views:	309 
Size:	37.5 KB 
ID:	23765  

  3. #3
    Registered User jmkatcher's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Puget Sound, Washington
    Posts
    676

    Default

    Does anyone make small locking tuners that would be appropriate for a mandolin headstock?

  4. #4
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,117

    Default

    those 40:1 steinberger tuners may be close to locking in effect, as string end is clamped and then pulled thru the mechanisim to raise pitch.

    packing in 5 (on headstock space) would be reasonable
    [gluing in plugs and re drilling?] , 8 probably not.

    but topic was floppy C, was it not?
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    edge of the abyss.... iowa
    Posts
    56

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (mandroid @ May 27 2007, 13:12)
    but topic was floppy C, was it not?
    no the topic was a locking nut, to which locking tuners could be a possible alternative.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Burke Virginia
    Posts
    49

    Default

    The Steinberger Gearless Tuners are very heavy. I have a set
    on a Yamaha Tele and they are very accurate, but I had to
    replace the strap buttons to get the guitar to balance with
    them. I would not recommend them for mando.

    I have Planet Waves auto-trim tuners (also by Ned) on my Fender 5 string and they work quite well. They lock the string to the post and cut off the excess as you tune. I had to drill out the holes larger than the stock bad tuners, but they improved the mandos "tunability" a lot. The strings still go out of tune, but not as often and tuning is a lot easier.


    http://www.musiciansfriend.com/product....=361450

    BTW: I'm having an EM-5 made and Jon is putting the stock Grover tuners on it. I wonder if I should ask him to put on the auto-trims?

    -vince

  7. #7
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy, NW Oregon.
    Posts
    17,117

    Default

    Fan fret schemes may help, as longer scale length means lower pitch is archived
    at a bit more tension, and smaller guage wound string.
    Novax Fandolin is shown on electric eye candy page, click on picture for NovaxGuitars website link.

    Parallel fretted, the Pentaula is a 15" scale. adds a 45 degree draw down
    angle past the 'nut' for the lowest string, which is an A ..

    AEBF#C#



    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Bucks Co., PA
    Posts
    2,745

    Default

    Kid, is yours Schwab's traditionally longer 14.5" scale, or the newer optional shorter one?

    Yeah, the Schwab design needs those clampy-things screwed into peghead to bring the string height down to the level of the tuners and to give the string an angled break over the nut. #The clampy-things create an extra bearing point between the nut and tuner, which makes tuning more difficult; worst on the C string. The extra bearing point in the peghead area is unfortunate.

    It's a little known fact that the string tension behind the nut and forward from the bridge will be a little tighter than the string's speaking length. #



    Wye Knot

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    edge of the abyss.... iowa
    Posts
    56

    Default

    do you mean string trees?

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Bucks Co., PA
    Posts
    2,745

    Default

    "String trees" sounds like as good a name as any I can think up.

    Too bad the Schwab design didn't angle the peghead to eliminate the need for these "string trees". But then it wouldn't look so Fender-y.
    Wye Knot

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Knoxville, TN
    Posts
    199

    Default

    First off, I should add that there's nothing wrong with either my Schwab or my new Mann. They both do exactly as they should, and any "problems" are inherent to the relatively short scale of the instrument and the C string. It's nothing that can't be dealt with. You just have to work harder to make sure everything's in tune.

    It's just particularly noticeable because I've been playing a lot of Queen, and the power chords tend to show you quickly if you're even slightly out of tune. But since I tune by ear anyway (give me an A and I'm off!), it ain't no big thing.

    Now...

    Quote Originally Posted by
    Lee asked: Kid,is yours Schwab's traditionally longer 14.5" scale, or the newer optional shorter one?
    The Schwab is the 14.5" scale, fortunately. I'd have gone insane long ago if I'd had to get used to a C string as floppy as one with a 13.75" scale would have been.

    Mann is the same - 14.5".


    Quote Originally Posted by
    mandroid noted:
    Fan fret schemes may help, as longer scale length means lower pitch is at a bit more tension, and smaller guage wound string.

    Novax Fandolin is shown on electric eye candy page, click on picture for NovaxGuitars website link.
    One of these days when I have some more dough, I'm going to get a fan-fretted 6 string electric built. It may - nay, probably will - have to be an octave rather than a basic mandolin, but that's better in a lot of ways anyway. Deeper register, more potential for filling guitar spots in music.



    Schwab 5-string No.29 (1982)
    Old Wave C# No.311 (2003)
    Mann SEM-5 No. 60 (2007)

Similar Threads

  1. Rose on the mountain (not 'wild rose of the')
    By Usonian in forum Old-Time, Roots, Early Country, Cajun, Tex-Mex
    Replies: 1
    Last: Feb-22-2007, 12:18pm
  2. Mandolin on a pink floyd tune?
    By Riccardo in forum Song and Tune Projects
    Replies: 2
    Last: Jan-11-2007, 2:40am
  3. Got a Rose Mandolin?
    By Tim Saxton in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 15
    Last: Oct-31-2004, 9:20pm
  4. Rose Mandolin History.
    By telepbrman in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 2
    Last: Oct-23-2004, 4:25am
  5. Rose mandolin
    By Kbone in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 2
    Last: Jul-25-2004, 7:51am

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •