Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

  1. #1

    Default Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    I just noticed my Mandolin lacks a tailpiece cover and exposes the strings. Will this be an issue at all? I personally like the look of tailpiece cover better, so if y'all have any recommendations on where I can find one in gold, that would be greatly appreciated.

    Oh and I noticed that some tailpiece covers are much more expensive than others; if the cover is purely cosmetic, why are some priced way higher than others?

  2. #2

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    You are perfectly fine without a cover on your tailpiece. The exception would be if the hooks are snagging on that hand knitted sweater grandma made for you. On the other hand, if it is a candidate for 1st prize in the ugly sweater competition, maybe an excuse for tossing it is a good thing! Sorry Grandma!

    Tailpieces are not really standardized so whatever you buy may not be a good fit. You almost need one off the same model to be sure it is a match. Even then, some bending is in order.

    Tailpiece quality can be all over the place. Especially gold versions. On some, the gold will rub right off, some the plating is better (it will still rub off).
    Robert Fear
    http://www.folkmusician.com

    "Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't.
    " - Pete Seeger

  3. #3
    Registered User Randi Gormley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Connecticut, USA
    Posts
    3,389

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    I don't know about anybody else, but my sleeve (or scarf or whatever) generally gets caught on whatever edge is there if there's no tail cover. so for me, it's a practical thing.
    --------------------------------
    1920 Lyon & Healy bowlback
    1923 Gibson A-1 snakehead
    1952 Strad-o-lin
    1983 Giannini ABSM1 bandolim
    2009 Giannini GBSM3 bandolim
    2011 Eastman MD305

  4. #4
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    If you could post a picture it might be helpful. I'm assuming you have a stamped Gibson style tailpiece and they aren't really all the same. You would be better off buying a complete tailpiece including cover. That way you'll know it fits.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  5. #5
    Oval holes are cool David Lewis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Sydney, Australia
    Posts
    1,485

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    How hard is it to replace the tailpiece? Every now and then I look at my gretsch New Yorker and think that this awful tailpiece has to go. (Sorry to slightly derail thread but the two topics are related.)

  6. #6
    Confused... or?
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Over the Hudson & thru the woods from NYC
    Posts
    2,933

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Quote Originally Posted by SpokeyDokey View Post
    ... if the cover is purely cosmetic, why are some priced way higher than others?
    Think of them as jewelry: purely cosmetic. I'm told that some jewelry is priced a bit higher than others.
    - Ed

    "Then one day we weren't as young as before
    Our mistakes weren't quite so easy to undo
    But by all those roads, my friend, we've travelled down
    I'm a better man for just the knowin' of you."
    - Ian Tyson

  7. The following members say thank you to EdHanrahan for this post:


  8. #7
    Doc Ivory Doc Ivory's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2015
    Location
    South West Florida
    Posts
    123

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Should be be a problem at all.
    You may get a short thread or sweater thread caught in it from time to time but it's a nothing to worry about.
    Doc Ivory
    -Play loud, live long..

  9. #8
    Registered User Drew Egerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Statesville, NC
    Posts
    1,191

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Quote Originally Posted by David Lewis View Post
    How hard is it to replace the tailpiece? Every now and then I look at my gretsch New Yorker and think that this awful tailpiece has to go. (Sorry to slightly derail thread but the two topics are related.)
    It's no big deal at all IF THE HOLES LINE UP.
    If not, then it can be a big job to fill the holes and drill new ones. I replaced the cast Allen tailpiece on my Kelley with am abbreviated Nugget tailpiece and it was a simple job. Of course you have to take all the strings off which also means relocating your bridge, but overall pretty simple.
    Drew
    2020 Northfield 4th Gen F5
    2022 Northfield NFS-F5E
    2019 Northfield Flat Top Octave
    2021 Gold Tone Mando Cello
    https://www.instagram.com/pilotdrew85

  10. The following members say thank you to Drew Egerton for this post:


  11. #9
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Quote Originally Posted by Drew Egerton View Post
    ...Of course you have to take all the strings off which also means relocating your bridge...
    That's what they make blue painters tape for. Simply outline where the bridge was before you start and mark the bass side for the bottom as well. The top should be obvious.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  12. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:


  13. #10

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    I have a mandolin with out a cover too. it was loose & made a little noise so I took it off. too bad I can't remember were I put it. you know some people here put solid cast metal tailpieces on there mandolins. just some thing to think about.

  14. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO & Chesterfield, MO
    Posts
    2,562

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeEdgerton View Post
    That's what they make blue painters tape for. Simply outline where the bridge was before you start and mark the bass side for the bottom as well. The top should be obvious.
    I just tape the bridge to the top with painters tape, making sure to tape the saddle down as well. No need to relocate and usually only slight adjustment for intonation.

  15. The following members say thank you to colorado_al for this post:


  16. #12
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default Re: Mandolin without Tailpiece Cover?

    Quote Originally Posted by colorado_al View Post
    I just tape the bridge to the top with painters tape, making sure to tape the saddle down as well. No need to relocate and usually only slight adjustment for intonation.
    Unless you're actually doing work on the body. It's easier to just mark the location if you're going to have to be turning it upside down.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  17. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MikeEdgerton For This Useful Post:


Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •