Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 27

Thread: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

  1. #1
    Registered User Cochiti Don's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Location
    Cochiti Lake,NM
    Posts
    183

    Default Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    This might be another beating a cafe dead horse, but I’m finding that I want to play in the exact spot that is otherwise occupied by frets I will never use. This apparently doesn’t bother most players I guess. But it bothers me. What should I do or not do?
    Peter Kaufman violin
    Old Wave two point

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    S.W. Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,529

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    I like the fingerboard scooped to avoid what I am assuming is the click that is bothering you. Some folks simply cut it off, but I actually like the look of a scooped florida.
    THE WORLD IS A BETTER PLACE JUST FOR YOUR SMILE!

  3. #3

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    I second getting it scooped if it's the extension.

    If it is below the extension, you may have to change your picking technique.

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,806

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Yep, get it scooped or removed altogether. Or, learn to live with it. You can hear a fair amount of pick click in professional recordings using Loar or Loar style mandolins with the full Florida...Grisman and Rice's Tone Poems has several examples...

    My first mandolin had the full extension, and I adjusted to it, and, heck, the pick click became almost like a metronome when playing hard. Since I moved up to my Silverangel, though, and got used to not having to deal with the extension, it really bugs me when I pick on a mandolin that has one...

    Not to say that I'd turn down a Loar if someone gave it to me, but I would have the extension scooped
    Last edited by CES; Aug-14-2018 at 9:30am.
    Chuck

  5. #5
    Loarcutus of MandoBorg DataNick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2012
    Location
    Fallbrook, CA
    Posts
    3,837

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Raise the action like Monroe did...
    1994 Gibson F5L - Weber signed


    "Mandolin brands are a guide, not gospel! I don't drink koolaid and that Emperor is naked!"
    "If you wanna get soul Baby, you gots to get the scroll..."
    "I would rather play music anyday for the beggar, the thief, and the fool!"
    "Perfection is not attainable; but if we chase perfection we can catch excellence" Vince Lombardi
    Playing Style: RockMonRoll Desperado Bluegrass Desperado YT Channel

  6. The following members say thank you to DataNick for this post:


  7. #6
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Why does everyone think playing sul tasto - that is, near the neck, is the "sweet spot" ?

    That picking position is for the effect of a mellower tone, same as playing sul ponticello (near the bridge) is an effect for getting a more thin bright tone color.

    Both are not the standard traditional spot to pick, which is between them.

    Those frets are there for playing classical mandolin music.

    Removing them is a shame.

    Learn to control your pick so as not to hit the fingerboard, or learn to like the real tone of your mandolin when played in the true sweet spot, which is app. 1/9 to 1/10 or the string length and closer to the bridge than seems common these days.

    That's where you get the brilliant tone and projection and the real sound of a mandolin.

    BTW, try using a pointed thinner but stiff pick, and you may get a better tone than if you use a round thick pick.

    All of this advice is from the Neapolitan mandolin tradition and may be counter to the standard American folk/Bluegrass wisdom.

  8. The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to DavidKOS For This Useful Post:


  9. #7
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    It's probably worth pointing out that that a Neopolitan bowlback mandolin has fewer frets, and therefore has a less intrusive fretboard extension, than the Loar-style F5 design from Gibson. A 'classical' Raffaele Calace mandolin, for example, has 24 frets (and many others have fewer: 20 or 22 are fairly typical). The F5 has 29 frets!! The fretboard extension on the F5 is correspondingly harder to miss if you try to play "sul tasto" -- closer to the nut. I tend to agree with David about the "true" location of the sweet spot, but it's squarely over the frets on an F5. On a bowlback, not so much.

    And it's nearly impossible to play expressively, or at full volume, on an F5 over its extension without the pick occasionally hitting those frets -- even for the very best players I have heard.

    Perhaps this is the real reason why scooping the extension on an F5 -- or removing the unused frets, or even cutting it off altogether -- is so popular among F5 players? Yes, even for those players with valuable Loar-era instruments. The extension poses much more of a problem on an F5 than on a bowlback, IMO.

  10. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sblock For This Useful Post:


  11. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    1,174

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    i never loved the looks of a scooped board especially with out faux frets but it was undeniable that this is the sweet spot, magic place on this mando..
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	0344C829-6003-4646-9F70-8DEF77B1717A.jpg 
Views:	351 
Size:	543.6 KB 
ID:	170218

  12. #9
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by sblock View Post
    It's probably worth pointing out that that a Neopolitan bowlback mandolin has fewer frets, and therefore has a less intrusive fretboard extension, than the Loar-style F5 design from Gibson. A 'classical' Raffaele Calace mandolin, for example, has 24 frets (and many others have fewer: 20 or 22 are fairly typical). The F5 has 29 frets!! The fretboard extension on the F5 is correspondingly harder to miss if you try to play "sul tasto" -- closer to the nut. I tend to agree with David about the "true" location of the sweet spot, but it's squarely over the frets on an F5. On a bowlback, not so much.
    My flatback has fingerboard up to a High A.



    What you say may explain why I am one mandolinist that does NOT prefer Gibson archtop mandolins to other types.

  13. #10
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Too true! It's a classical mandolin, yes, but it's not a bowlback. The Calace bowlback mandolins don't go to 29 frets, but there are indeed some Embergher mandolins out there that do. However, those are the exceptions. The vast majority of classical bowlback mandolins just don't go that high. And as you can see from your nice picture (but you should have smiled! ), your fretboard extension has to reach clear across the entire oval hole to do it! Caterina Lichtenberg's classical mandolin goes to 24 frets, for example, and this is fairly typical. And Avi Avital's 'modern' classical mandolin by Arik Kerman goes up to 24 frets, too.

    Anyway, I see nothing wrong whatosoever with scooping the extension on an F5. The vast majority of mandolin players will never use any frets above, say, 20 or 22. Even classical players seldom, if ever, use them. Let's be honest, here: they're mostly just a 'gimmick!' Furthermore, they are very nearly unplayable! The tone sucks, and the notes die out incredibly quickly. The great David Apollon famously removed the 27th fret from his F5 extension just to give him the extra space to fret the next note up more easily, and he only did that for one show-off tune.

    So scoop away, I say.

  14. The following members say thank you to sblock for this post:


  15. #11

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    I vote scooped Florida as a compromise position. A Florida is just so traditional. I do like some of the newer builds that hint of a Florida but don't actually have them.
    Silverangel A
    Arches F style kit
    1913 Gibson A-1

  16. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO & Chesterfield, MO
    Posts
    2,562

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    It sounds to me like that mandolin is broken. Time for a new one!

  17. #13
    Innocent Bystander JeffD's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Upstate New York
    Posts
    24,807
    Blog Entries
    56

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    Why does everyone think playing sul tasto - that is, near the neck, is the "sweet spot" ?

    That picking position is for the effect of a mellower tone, same as playing sul ponticello (near the bridge) is an effect for getting a more thin bright tone color.

    Both are not the standard traditional spot to pick, which is between them.

    Those frets are there for playing classical mandolin music.

    Removing them is a shame.

    Learn to control your pick so as not to hit the fingerboard, or learn to like the real tone of your mandolin when played in the true sweet spot, which is app. 1/9 to 1/10 or the string length and closer to the bridge than seems common these days.

    That's where you get the brilliant tone and projection and the real sound of a mandolin.

    BTW, try using a pointed thinner but stiff pick, and you may get a better tone than if you use a round thick pick.

    All of this advice is from the Neapolitan mandolin tradition and may be counter to the standard American folk/Bluegrass wisdom.
    I know a few amazing players who move their picking position up or down, slightly, depending on the strings they are on, to even out the tone. Knowing how to play the idiosyncrasies your instrument is a wonderful thing.
    A talent for trivializin' the momentous and complicatin' the obvious.

    The entire staff
    funny....

  18. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to JeffD For This Useful Post:


  19. #14
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by sblock View Post
    And as you can see from your nice picture (but you should have smiled! ), your fretboard extension has to reach clear across the entire oval hole to do it!
    I used the highest fret A at the end of an english Country Dance tune last Sat. night.

    "your fretboard extension has to reach clear across the entire oval hole to do it!"

    Yeah!

    I play in all positions - sometimes I play as much below the other guys, sometimes way above them...

    In a way it's like violin vs. fiddle:

    same basic instrument, different approaches.

    Many fiddle styles don't go into upper positions much - others do, same as mandolin styles.

    I also have a vintage bowlback that has a limited fingerboard...I prefer the mandolins with more frets. I had to send the mandolin with the full length fingerboard back to the maker for a few weeks to adjust a few things, and I really missed the upper notes.

  20. The following members say thank you to DavidKOS for this post:


  21. #15
    Lurkist dhergert's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2012
    Location
    Blue Zone, California
    Posts
    1,876
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    These are the two mandolins that I routinely play:

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Scooped.jpg 
Views:	168 
Size:	53.5 KB 
ID:	170252 - Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Truncated.jpg 
Views:	138 
Size:	111.3 KB 
ID:	170253

    Of the two I much prefer the truncated; even though the scoop is generous, I still hit it occasionally.
    -- Don

    "Music: A minor auditory irritation occasionally characterized as pleasant."
    "It is a lot more fun to make music than it is to argue about it."


    2002 Gibson F-9
    2016 MK LFSTB
    1975 Suzuki taterbug (plus many other noisemakers)
    [About how I tune my mandolins]
    [Our recent arrival]

  22. The following members say thank you to dhergert for this post:


  23. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Conneaut Lake, PA
    Posts
    4,147

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    You know, this thread got me thinking, and I had one of those “duh” moments. It suddenly seems to me that, on an electric guitar or any other electric instrument with two pickups, the position of the two pickups gives the player “sul tasto” or “sul ponticello” sounds simply by switching from the neck to the bridge pickup, without having to change your pick location. Am I right?

    It kind of seems to me that the “argument” here isn’t really an argument at all. It’s just a difference in styles, and players adapting the instruments to that style. What sounds good to a Classical player steeped in European traditions does not sound good to a Bluegrass or folk player steeped in American traditions. Many American players playing in American folk music styles just prefer the mellow tone you get closer to the neck. Just like many jazz guitar player only use their neck pickup, or own a guitar that only has a neck pickup.

    One of the things I like about my Weber Bitterroots is that they have no extensions. I would say that, in my own playing, the highest I ever go is fret 15, and then only occasionally. So that works for me. I would probably never even buy an instrument with an extension. They just get in the way for me and I don’t need them for what I play. But it’s a big, wonderful world of mandolins out there, and I say play whatever instrument floats your boat. That said, I am not a big fan of doing major alterations on instruments. Rather than having to decide whether to remove the extension, or scoop it, and whether to have faux frets or no frets, I like the idea of just buying an instrument that meets your needs as it is.
    Don

    2016 Weber Custom Bitterroot F
    2011 Weber Bitterroot A
    1974 Martin Style A

  24. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    119

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    I played my first mandolin for months before seeing the "Florida" reference here on the forum. After I found out what it was I realized I had not noticed its existence! Mine did not have it and I cannot imagine being able to play that far up the neck anyway. As I have purchased additional mandolins (of course!) I seek out the non-extended ones.

  25. #18
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by multidon View Post
    You know, this thread got me thinking, and I had one of those “duh” moments. It suddenly seems to me that, on an electric guitar or any other electric instrument with two pickups, the position of the two pickups gives the player “sul tasto” or “sul ponticello” sounds simply by switching from the neck to the bridge pickup, without having to change your pick location. Am I right?
    Partially.

    Indeed, the placement of a pickup does affect tone, as the pickup will amplify the sound of the strings at the place the pickup crosses the strings.

    However, when using any particular pickup on the electric guitar, you also can change the tone by playing sul tasto or sul ponticello.

    Quote Originally Posted by multidon View Post
    It kind of seems to me that the “argument” here isn’t really an argument at all. It’s just a difference in styles, and players adapting the instruments to that style. What sounds good to a Classical player steeped in European traditions does not sound good to a Bluegrass or folk player steeped in American traditions. Many American players playing in American folk music styles just prefer the mellow tone you get closer to the neck.
    I guess this is true.

    Although I was born in America, I evidently do not have "American" tastes in mandolins or mandolin tone.

    Viva Italia.

  26. #19

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    29 fret extension on a carved-top Gibsonesque mandolin is like an appendix;no reason for it to be there and has the potential to cause
    serious problems.

    Why let a useless affectation cramp one's style? Also,it seems counterproductive to let a silly piece of the instrument
    guide you as to whether or not to purchase a particular mandolin. It's easy enough to cut off and makes a much more
    pick-friendly instrument. Fretboards are replaceable.

    Scooping helps but can still impede the pick.

    Best solution,for me, is to lop off the extension after the 19th fret. And make a bolo tie out of the Fla.

  27. #20

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    Why does everyone think playing sul tasto - that is, near the neck, is the "sweet spot" ?
    Google tells me that one primary English translation of 'sul tasto' is 'on the button.' Which makes me think it is actually equivalent to 'sweet spot.' But I also imagine that the 'sweet spot' on mandolin is subjective. I tend to play mandolin (and guitar) further back towards the bridge. So for me, the harsher sound I get from playing there is 'sweet', even if it is not actually sweet.

  28. The following members say thank you to vetus scotia for this post:


  29. #21
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by V70416 View Post
    29 fret extension on a carved-top Gibsonesque mandolin is like an appendix;no reason for it to be there and has the potential to cause
    serious problems.

    Why let a useless affectation cramp one's style?
    If you play classical mandolin those frets are not "a useless affectation".

    Of course if you have no interest in classical mandolin, then you may never use those frets. But they were there for a reason.

  30. #22
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,043

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by vetus scotia View Post
    Google tells me that one primary English translation of 'sul tasto' is 'on the button.' Which makes me think it is actually equivalent to 'sweet spot.' But I also imagine that the 'sweet spot' on mandolin is subjective. I tend to play mandolin (and guitar) further back towards the bridge. So for me, the harsher sound I get from playing there is 'sweet', even if it is not actually sweet.
    Google is not using the term as musicians do.

    https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/sul%20tasto

    "with the bow kept over the fingerboard so as to produce a soft thin tone —used as a direction in music for a stringed instrument"

    https://www.britannica.com/art/sul-tasto

    " sul tasto (bowing on the fingerboard),"

  31. The following members say thank you to DavidKOS for this post:


  32. #23

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Scooped. No point having something that annoys you regardless of classical or other viewpoints. If it's a high end mandolin then a really neat scoop (but not too long which looks bad) is the answer. Don't like Sam Bush's cut off and don't now why Gibson had to make EXACTLY the same shape for their Sam Bush model. I definitely appreciate why Sam Bush cut his off though. I thought Gibson could have looked at the shape and offerred to do a mini Florida on Sam's and then make their Sam Bush model like that.

    I have a shortened one on my Northfield and had one on a custom Summit a few years ago and both brilliant. When I pick up an F4 or similar now, the pick click really annoys.

    If fingerboard is not bound then, take it back a good way. You'll soon forget about anyone's opinion except your own when enjoying playing it.
    Last edited by jimmy powells; Aug-15-2018 at 6:06pm. Reason: typing error

  33. #24

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    Of course if you have no interest in classical mandolin, then you may never use those frets. But they were there for a reason.
    Dunno. When I figure out how to use the first three frets maybe I'll move on to some of the ones higher up...
    Last edited by Marty Jacobson; Aug-15-2018 at 7:22pm.

  34. The following members say thank you to Marty Jacobson for this post:


  35. #25
    Mandolin user MontanaMatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    1,252

    Default Re: Sweet spot vs fingerboard extension

    Mini Florida, with scoop. My preference.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	IMG_0073.JPG 
Views:	115 
Size:	270.5 KB 
ID:	170274
    2007 Weber Custom Elite "old wood"
    2017 Ratliff R5 Custom #1148
    Several nice old Fiddles
    2007 Martin 000-15S 12 fret Auditorium-slot head
    Deering Classic Open Back
    Too many microphones

    BridgerCreekBoys.com

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •