Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 26

Thread: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

  1. #1

    Default Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20180224_150425.jpg 
Views:	223 
Size:	584.7 KB 
ID:	165357

  2. #2

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    This was a gift from a friend who purchased it new. He can not remember exactly but thinks it was the late 30's.

  3. #3
    Registered User lowtone2's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    lower alabama
    Posts
    893

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Flowers might help.

  4. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to lowtone2 For This Useful Post:


  5. #4
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,874

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    We have a member that seems to have the catalogs for these. He'll pop in here in the next day or so.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  6. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:


  7. #5

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Thank you.

  8. #6
    Mando-Accumulator Jim Garber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Westchester, NY
    Posts
    30,753

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeEdgerton View Post
    We have a member that seems to have the catalogs for these. He'll pop in here in the next day or so.
    Well, until that guy with all those catalogs shows up—maybe this would help. This is a page from a 1947-1948 Grossman catalog, a distributor. The K-70 is pictured at the upper left and has the same features as the OP's mandolin including the logo.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	grossman47-48_kay.jpg 
Views:	297 
Size:	307.2 KB 
ID:	165358 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	grossman47-48_kay_K70.jpg 
Views:	277 
Size:	174.1 KB 
ID:	165359
    Jim

    My Stream on Soundcloud
    Facebook
    19th Century Tunes
    Playing lately:
    1924 Gibson A4 - 2018 Campanella A-5 - 2007 Brentrup A4C - 1915 Frank Merwin Ashley violin - Huss & Dalton DS - 1923 Gibson A2 black snakehead - '83 Flatiron A5-2 - 1939 Gibson L-00 - 1936 Epiphone Deluxe - 1928 Gibson L-5 - ca. 1890s Fairbanks Senator Banjo - ca. 1923 Vega Style M tenor banjo - ca. 1920 Weymann Style 25 Mandolin-Banjo - National RM-1

  9. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Jim Garber For This Useful Post:


  10. #7

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Wow! $39.00 strikes me as a lot of money for 1947....

  11. #8
    Registered User nmiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Hill, CT
    Posts
    339

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    The combination of dot fret markers, segmented f-holes, and a raised plastic logo on this model is pictured in Kay catalogs from 1952 to 1954. That's not definitive, since who knows how long they used old pictures, but it's a pretty reasonable estimate.
    www.OldFrets.com: the obscure side of vintage instruments.

  12. The following members say thank you to nmiller for this post:


  13. #9

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Garber View Post
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	grossman47-48_kay.jpg 
Views:	297 
Size:	307.2 KB 
ID:	165358 Click image for larger version. 

Name:	grossman47-48_kay_K70.jpg 
Views:	277 
Size:	174.1 KB 
ID:	165359

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Mando View Post
    Wow! $39.00 strikes me as a lot of money for 1947....
    Equivalent to $449 in 2018, according to an Inflation Calculator. I wonder if that K-70 Kay sounded as good as what $449 can buy new nowadays? Thinking of all the Kentucky models, etc., that people here are always saying have good tone for the price. If I had to bet, just guessing, I'd say a modern new $449-ish Kentucky would probably sound 'better' than the Kay... but maybe not...

    Interestingly, that same catalog page's cheapest mandolin was a flat top for $15.75, or the equivalent of $181 in 2018. That does seem high compared to our options nowadays for ultra-cheap mandolins, namely a modern $50 Rogue, although I suppose that's comparing apples/oranges (flat vs curved top).

    How about this for sticker shock: DeArmond mandolin pickup with volume control, $27.50 each, which the inflation calculator says is equivalent to $317 in 2018.

  14. The following members say thank you to Jess L. for this post:


  15. #10

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    The gentleman, who is now 96, that gave it to me could not remember exactly, but stated he bought it eithe just before, or after his service in WWII.

  16. #11
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,874

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Post a picture of the back of the headstock. The tuners might give us a better chance of dating it.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  17. #12
    Registered User nmiller's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Rocky Hill, CT
    Posts
    339

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    It's definitely a post-War mandolin. That logo wasn't in use before the late '40s, at the earliest.
    www.OldFrets.com: the obscure side of vintage instruments.

  18. The following members say thank you to nmiller for this post:


  19. #13

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by MikeEdgerton View Post
    Post a picture of the back of the headstock. The tuners might give us a better chance of dating it.
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	20180226_091014.jpg 
Views:	169 
Size:	574.7 KB 
ID:	165409

  20. #14
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,874

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Those tuners were being used during and just after WWII. I seriously doubt they were still using them in the 50's. They might have been using old stock. By the 50's I would expect to see enclosed Kluson tuners.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  21. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:


  22. #15
    music with whales Jim Nollman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Friday Harbor WA
    Posts
    1,633

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    that's a beauty. Reminds me a lot of one I owned for ten years before I finally turned fancy in my choices of mandolins to own.

    If this one was mine, I wouldn't hesitate to take it to a luthier to get a proper setup, replace the worn out frets, possibly replace the tuners with Rubners, and maybe even radius the fingerboard.
    Explore some of my published music here.

    —Jim

    Sierra F5 #30 (2005)
    Altman 2-point (2007)
    Portuguese fado cittern (1965)

  23. The following members say thank you to Jim Nollman for this post:


  24. #16
    Full Grown and Cussin' brunello97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor/Austin
    Posts
    6,281

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Mando View Post
    Wow! $39.00 strikes me as a lot of money for 1947....
    Using the BLS inflation calculator, $39.00 in 1947 translates into just under $450.00 today.

    Mick
    Ever tried, ever failed? No matter. Try again, fail again. Fail better.--Samuel Beckett
    ______________________

    '05 Cuisinart Toaster
    '93 Chuck Taylor lowtops
    '12 Stetson Open Road
    '06 Bialetti expresso maker
    '14 Irish Linen Ramon Puig

  25. The following members say thank you to brunello97 for this post:


  26. #17

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by brunello97 View Post
    Using the BLS inflation calculator, $39.00 in 1947 translates into just under $450.00 today.
    With all due respect, I already posted that two days earlier:

    Quote Originally Posted by JL277z View Post
    Equivalent to $449 in 2018, according to an Inflation Calculator. ..
    Great minds think alike?

  27. #18

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Those calculator's confuse me for some reason. They don't seem to take into account that back then, a dollar was a dollar, buying power-wise. Just like when JP Morgan was a millionaire, it meant something unheard of -- almost impossible to do. Nowadays, anybody with a good retirement account can retire a "millionaire" -- the money just doesn't have the buying power it once did.

    I'm old enough to remember when nickel candy bars "jumped" up to a dime and there was almost a national outrage. Like a "what's this world coming to?" sadness at the end of an era. Well, guess what? Once they go up they never go down, do they?

    I checked some of those charts, also. A new Ford in 1947 was $1400. An average house was $7000. Average wages were $2850 a year. Postage stamp was 3 cents. So................I guess a new Kay cost less than a week's wages. And, hey, it's a Kay, not a Gibson. So, OK.

  28. #19
    Full Grown and Cussin' brunello97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Ann Arbor/Austin
    Posts
    6,281

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    "What this country needs is a good $100 Gibson mandolin!"

    Mick
    Ever tried, ever failed? No matter. Try again, fail again. Fail better.--Samuel Beckett
    ______________________

    '05 Cuisinart Toaster
    '93 Chuck Taylor lowtops
    '12 Stetson Open Road
    '06 Bialetti expresso maker
    '14 Irish Linen Ramon Puig

  29. The following members say thank you to brunello97 for this post:


  30. #20
    Registered User Timbofood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI.
    Posts
    7,487

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by lowtone2 View Post
    Flowers might help.
    Well, it’s nice to see someone beat me to the smarty pants response!
    I was going to say dinner and a movie used to work for me but...
    Yes, I know, go to my corner!
    Timothy F. Lewis
    "If brains was lard, that boy couldn't grease a very big skillet" J.D. Clampett

  31. #21

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Nice mandolin. Nice friend.
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

  32. #22
    Mando accumulator allenhopkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rochester NY 14610
    Posts
    17,378

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Quote Originally Posted by Jeff Mando View Post
    Those calculator's confuse me for some reason. They don't seem to take into account that back then, a dollar was a dollar, buying power-wise. Just like when JP Morgan was a millionaire, it meant something unheard of -- almost impossible to do. Nowadays, anybody with a good retirement account can retire a "millionaire" -- the money just doesn't have the buying power it once did....I checked some of those charts, also. A new Ford in 1947 was $1400. An average house was $7000. Average wages were $2850 a year. Postage stamp was 3 cents. So................I guess a new Kay cost less than a week's wages. And, hey, it's a Kay, not a Gibson. So, OK.
    Isn't that the point of inflation calculators -- to show the increase in prices over the years, which you can also see as "the decline in the buying power of the dollar?" Sure, my father bought a big ol' farmhouse and five acres of land in rural western NY for $8K in 1948; he was making about $2500 per year in a "professional" job, so it was several years' worth of income. My first new car, 1972 Dodge Dart, was $2400, which was a big purchase for someone making $7500 a year.

    The inroads of inflation can only be understood if we balance off the increased cost with the increased income. Being a millionaire sure ain't what it used to be, but the balance between your "good retirement account" and what it can buy, may be about the same.

    As for "once they go up, they never come down," consider what I paid for a chromatic tuner 25 years ago, and what I'm paying now. Some things do actually get less expensive -- or, alternatively, you can get better quality for the same money (adjusted for inflation, of course).
    Allen Hopkins
    Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
    Natl Triolian Dobro mando
    Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
    H-O mandolinetto
    Stradolin Vega banjolin
    Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
    Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
    Flatiron 3K OM

  33. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to allenhopkins For This Useful Post:


  34. #23

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    Good points, Allen. Understanding those charts is above my "pay grade" which might be the actual root of the problem! And, as far as retirement goes, we are also living longer -- at least the lucky ones are!

    You made me think of those early Texas Instruments "pocket calculators" -- I think they were $150 back in the early 70's. Big money when minimum wage was $1.60 an hour. I was probably the last generation of school kids to be trained on the slide rule!

  35. The following members say thank you to Jeff Mando for this post:


  36. #24
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,874

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    The first TI calculators were well over $2500.00. The price dropped drastically month by month. Within a few years they were giving calculators away for free.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  37. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:


  38. #25

    Default Re: Help dating this Kay Mandolin

    I remember having to buy one of those TI calculators for math class. Over $150 IIRC.

    My math teacher challenged everybody to a duel - he put a formula on the board that the class came up with and it was us with our calculators against him with his slide rule. He had it solved before most of us got the first number entered.
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •