Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 34

Thread: 53 Harmony Tenor

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default 53 Harmony Tenor

    I came across a 1953 Harmony H950T that looks to be in really nice shape but I have not gone to see it yet. Estate find that somebody else snapped up. Says the neck is straight but the action seems a bit high at .18 gap at the 7th. He bought it strung at DGBE (Chicago tuning) and has not messed with anything. Has an original DeArmond monkey on a stick pickup. If I pick it up my concern is that if I string it up to straight tenor tuning CGDA....am I raising pitch/tension or decreasing it. I have heard some bad things about old Harmony Tenor necks warping with added tension.
    Any thoughts?

    Thanks, Tony
    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	53 Harmony H950T.jpg 
Views:	857 
Size:	22.8 KB 
ID:	139235

  2. #2
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,926

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    I question the date and it looks like it's been refinished. I never saw one that was that shiny. There should be a date code stamped inside like S-55 or F-62. The number part of that is the year it was manufactured. The bridge should be adjustable but there won't be a truss rod.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  3. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:

    ajh 

  4. #3
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    It looks nice in the photo, string tension should be roughly the same whatever the tuning.
    As Mike says you can easiy ajust the bridge hight, my 62 Monterey has a steel rod in the neck.

  5. The following members say thank you to fox for this post:

    ajh 

  6. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Thanks for the help. I sent a request to the guy for more info....his reply was "The numbers inside the body are 625H950 and a stamp "F-55-T Made in USA." There are no cracks in the cables. I used only a lightly damp rag to clean the guitar--no cleaning agents or polish."
    The DeArmond has a stamp of 53 on it and supposedly came with the instrument. It also has the original case.

    I agree with you Mike that the finish on it looks a little fishy....much too shiny. I'll likely have to make a bit of a road trip to take a look at it. Now if I could get that dang Epi tenor that is in the classifieds off my mind!

  7. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    He sent me a few more (better) pics. Definitely not oversprayed.Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Upper.JPG 
Views:	351 
Size:	175.0 KB 
ID:	139264Click image for larger version. 

Name:	Lower.jpg 
Views:	301 
Size:	152.1 KB 
ID:	139265Click image for larger version. 

Name:	pup.JPG 
Views:	313 
Size:	234.6 KB 
ID:	139266

  8. #6
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Looks very collectable to me although from what I know they don't sound very good! Of course I don't know that much !!
    Hopefully someone will tell us more about the model but the majority are made from pressed ply wood or birch wood & really don't sound very nice, very quiet too...
    However it just looks superb

  9. #7
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,926

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    They are solid woods and they are pressed not carved. I'm sure the pickup was added, perhaps by the original owner. I used to buy these things in the early 60's and the pickups were additional. If Harmony had built it as an electric they would have built the pickup in like they did on their other electric guitars.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  10. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Mike and fox,
    Kind of riding the fence on this....I can get the whole package (Guitar, Monkey and original case) for 550 firm. And have to drive 75 miles each way to hear/play it. Not too sure about that high action....he says the neck is straight so that might not be a problem. The large lower bout size and the extra length kind of push me away a little also. Am used to my 21.25" scale/small body Regal Tenor. In your opinion, how does his price sound?
    Thanks, Tony

  11. #9
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,926

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    I'm not the one to ask about the price on these. I personally have a hard time looking at those numbers knowing what I paid for them new.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  12. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:

    ajh 

  13. #10
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Hi Tony, I cant really help you with the value as I live just off the coast of France and the values are very different over here!
    I bought my 62 Monterey for a very similar price but it was in very poor shape.
    Mine is solid wood (Birch) and I really like the shape & scale length but I spent an awful lot of time getting it to sound half decent & that included removing the thick layer of paint!! However I don't know if your boy is the same construction & if it has a better tone wood top?
    If it was for sale in my corner of the world it would be worth a lot more than 550 but I think it would be a collector who would buy it and not a player.

  14. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    fox....didn't notice where you were located in the dialogue. I would think pretty much everything there is just a bit on the outrageous side! And probably worth it living there. I have run across a couple of Harmony archtop 6 strings that I snarfed up, but I really suck at guitar so they were just moved along. I have fairly small hands for a guy so the long reaches really make full or even three fingers hard to chord unless I really take a tune apart and get serious about inversions.
    Going to go see it tomorrow and see what happens. I hate winding up with orphans.....but again, opportunity strikes. Dammit.

  15. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    I did wind up buying it. Straight neck, great condition overall. Very old strings on it that still sounded quite nice through the box. Not a huge sound, but nice tone and great sustain. Surprisingly the larger body was not an issue as the waist sits pretty nicely. Am a happy camper. Now just need to get rid of that musty smell. Turns out it had been sitting in the case in a basement for quite awhile and the outside of the case itself had started molding. Not a touch on the instrument. In the cases compartment were some very old Gibson and Black Diamond strings. Another orphan finds a home.

  16. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to ajh For This Useful Post:

    bruce.bfoxMdJVerne Andru 

  17. #13
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Good for you, I hope the guitar enjoys the light

  18. #14

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    I picked up a minty 60's Harmony Montery a while back. It's much like yours. I like the tone and find if it's played sitting down so the back isn't up against your body, it can be quite loud. Standing with a strap deadens the body too much IMHO.

    I believe they have steel reinforced necks, so as long as the neck is straight and the frets are good, they can be made into nice players. Mine, and I believe they all did, came with a bone nut and bass frets.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	HarmonyMontereyLeaderTenor-01.jpg 
Views:	277 
Size:	140.1 KB 
ID:	139378
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

  19. #15
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,926

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Some had steel reinforced necks, most did not. I know because I broke two of them back in the 60's. I started seeing that Steel Reinforced Neck sticker around the mid 60's.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  20. The following members say thank you to MikeEdgerton for this post:


  21. #16
    ISO TEKNO delsbrother's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Caulifonya
    Posts
    3,098

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    OT, but do any of you Harmony heads know if they offered a tenor in the Catalina or Hollywood finish? Being from LA I've always been drawn to those, but didn't want/need a six stringer.

    If not, plan B was to buy a basket case tenor and refinish it, though I'm sure that would offend the collectors..

  22. #17
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    I would not worry about offending collectors, well I certainly didn't



    - - - Updated - - -

  23. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fox For This Useful Post:


  24. #18

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Quote Originally Posted by delsbrother View Post
    OT, but do any of you Harmony heads know if they offered a tenor in the Catalina or Hollywood finish:

    Take a look at the Tenor Page on the Harmony Database site.

  25. #19
    Registered User Charles E.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Saint Augustine Beach FL
    Posts
    6,649

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Quote Originally Posted by ajh View Post
    I did wind up buying it. Straight neck, great condition overall. Very old strings on it that still sounded quite nice through the box. Not a huge sound, but nice tone and great sustain. Surprisingly the larger body was not an issue as the waist sits pretty nicely. Am a happy camper. Now just need to get rid of that musty smell. Turns out it had been sitting in the case in a basement for quite awhile and the outside of the case itself had started molding. Not a touch on the instrument. In the cases compartment were some very old Gibson and Black Diamond strings. Another orphan finds a home.
    Did you get the DeArmond pickup with it? Plugged into a tube amp that thing would be a rockabilly machine! Heck the pickup is probably worth $ 100.oo by it self.
    Charley

    A bunch of stuff with four strings

  26. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Charley,
    Yes, got the DeArmond with it. Kind of took a gamble on that bit. It is a "Guitar Mike" with a 53 stamped on the small tab on the pup body. I couldn't listen to it to verify that it works because it has a funky little 3/8" fine thread plug on it. There is a guy on the net that offers a cable that will screw onto it, then go to a 1/4 plug...........but he wants about 50 for it. I found the end I need on ebay for 10 and will cut an old small dia cable and solder the end to it. Should be here in the next couple days. Hope that works out as the DeArmonds are supposed to be expensive to fix.

    I went to put new strings (J66) on it yesterday and part of the bridge saddle split and then snapped off at tension (much bad language!). Was able to save the saddle by sanding it down to the metal studs, raising it on the thumbscrews to where the action was good, then reworking it to get the block compensated again. Worked out fine but I don't like having the saddle jacked up on the screws that high. Am having a problem finding archtop tenor bridge/saddle....will likely wind up making a new ebony saddle if I can't find a proper replacement.

    The sound is clear with plenty of sustain....sweet sounding, but definitely not loud.
    Tony

  27. The following members say thank you to ajh for this post:


  28. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    St Paul, Minn
    Posts
    569

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Got the 3/8" male adaptor in the mail. Got it soldered on and plugged in. DeArmond works great but need to dial down the bass. Clean is really cool.........but then run it through a reverb box and it is a whole 'nother beast.

    Way too much fun.

  29. #22

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Just thought I'd pass out an FYI on the volume.

    Archtop guitars have a different mechanism for driving the soundboard than a pinned flattop. Pinned flattops benefit from the string moving against the bridge as well as pulling up from under the soundboard.

    Strings on an archtop build, like your Harmony, only drive the top through the bridge. Plus archtop bridges put distance between strings and soundboard that's effected by the bridge material, how well it seats to the top, etc.

    The good news is archtops tend to have far more dynamic range IMHO. But to get it you have to drive them harder to get the same level of volume as a flattop, up to the point where the flattop starts compressing.

    A flattop will start compressing the tone well before an archtop, which means you get better and more tone with an archtop, but you have to be willing to drive them hard. That's why archtops were favored in the acoustic jazz ensembles - they were way louder.
    VerneAndru.com | oKee.ComX

    - ---==< V >==--- -

  30. The following members say thank you to Verne Andru for this post:

    ajh 

  31. #23
    Registered User MdJ's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    154

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Quote Originally Posted by fox View Post
    I would not worry about offending collectors, well I certainly didn't



    - - - Updated - - -
    That Bb chord is scaring me.....

  32. #24
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Ha Ha, must be Mark Josephs version of house of the rising sun http://www.tenorguitarfoundation.org/rising-sun.htm in Bb
    Last edited by fox; Oct-15-2015 at 1:52am.

  33. The following members say thank you to fox for this post:

    MdJ 

  34. #25
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Mieres, Spain
    Posts
    99

    Default Re: 53 Harmony Tenor

    Does anyone happen to know what pickup is in the picture?
    Levin Model 46 mandolin (love it)
    Harmony H1215T Tenor Guitar
    Peavey Fury Bass

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •