Re: Grading Used Instruments
Unanswerable questions, unfortunately. No accepted "1 to 10" set to objective criteria exist, that would apply to dealer, let alone private, sales of used instruments.
Descriptions are worded with the intent to sell an instrument. Adjectives that you list are almost totally subjective; my "excellent" instrument might be your "passable," or even "unacceptable."
The only advice I can come up with, is to deal with sellers, like those who sponsor the Cafe, who have established good reputations for describing their used items accurately, and who don't sell damaged goods, or over-hyped mandolins with problems. If they have an instrument with wear, damage from usage, etc., they'll specify it. If you buy from the Cafe classifieds, you know that the Cafe staff are watching these transaction, and take any complaints seriously.
You can't be protected from "musical duds," however. If the mandolin was undamaged, the fact that the seller said it was "excellent," and you didn't like the sound of it, is a case of caveat emptor, "let the buyer beware." Best course of action is to buy where the seller will let you have a trial approval period, and you can return it if not satisfied, only paying the shipping costs. Unfortunately, many private sellers don't offer this feature, though quite a few dealers will.
There are a fairly standard set of terms: "mint," "excellent," "very good," "good," "fair" etc. that many sellers use. But -- there are no objective scores to determine into which category an instrument falls.
Allen Hopkins
Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
Natl Triolian Dobro mando
Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
H-O mandolinetto
Stradolin Vega banjolin
Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
Flatiron 3K OM
Bookmarks