Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 41 of 41

Thread: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

  1. #26
    Registered User foldedpath's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Pacific Northwest, USA
    Posts
    5,296

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    So-called "sweetened" tuning schemes are designed to allow instruments designed for 12 tone equal temperament tuning (12TET) to sound more like systems such as mean-tone tuning... in a few closely related keys.

    For centuries many keyboard instruments such as pipe organs were tuned to various tunings that were NOT 12TET.

    Mostly what bothers string players - I've seen this issue on regular guitar and steel guitar forums - is the 3rds, which is why I mentioned mean-tone tuning.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meantone_temperament

    "by choosing an appropriate size for the tempered fifths, may produce a perfect major third or a perfect minor third, but not both at the same time."

    It's those 3rds that seem to need "sweetening", as long as you play basic chords and do not get too far away on the circle of 5ths.
    Right, the "problem" with 12TET is that the major third interval is something like 14 cents sharp, and the minor third is something like 16 cents flat. Some guitar players like to tune their B string just a hair flat, because it makes the open and barre "Cowboy Chords" with the third interval on the B string sound a little sweeter when playing a major chord. But then you wreck the minor chords, or any other chord shapes where the third isn't on the B string.

    It's better to bite the bullet, and learn to live with the 12TET system of our frets. Unless you only play Cowboy Chords in major key tunes, I guess.

  2. The following members say thank you to foldedpath for this post:


  3. #27
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Chicagoland
    Posts
    720

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Thanks to all for interesting insights. Personally I will stick to tuning both by tuner then actually playing them & adjusting one till they sound right together.

    I've never been bothered by the discrepancies inherent in getting fretted instruments in tune, but it is intriguing to think about ways to make them sound as good as possible ... (considering!).
    Last edited by jesserules; Sep-06-2017 at 8:56pm.

  4. #28
    '`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`'`' Jacob's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    1,130

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	dr52d28dea.gif 
Views:	132 
Size:	19.5 KB 
ID:	160542

  5. The following members say thank you to Jacob for this post:


  6. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    2,573

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Seems to me that this sweetness is in the ears of the beholder. My Dad was one that always tuned the B string a hair flat, that was what I heard before I could hold a guitar, it was the way it was tuned aa I was learning to play and it's the way I have to tune a guitar now. If I'm listening to someone that doesn't do that all I can think is " tune the #### guitar.

  7. #30
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,050

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mandoplumb View Post
    Seems to me that this sweetness is in the ears of the beholder. My Dad was one that always tuned the B string a hair flat, that was what I heard before I could hold a guitar, it was the way it was tuned aa I was learning to play and it's the way I have to tune a guitar now. .
    Thanks.

    and I bet y'all played in G an awful lot!

  8. #31
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Folks have been complaining about 12TET (12-tone, equal temperament) for centuries, it seems. Get over it, people, I say! If you intend to play Western-style music in more than just one key with others, or if you want to play a fretted instrument, or a keyboard instrument, for that matter, then you'd best stop all the whining and just get used to the minor idiosyncracies of 12TET. It's the only practical, versatile solution. The reasons why have been explained more times than I can count. And you can ask anyone familiar with music theory. So set your basic tuner to A440, tune up your mandolin courses in unison, and get on with making some music...

    Tough love.

  9. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to sblock For This Useful Post:


  10. #32
    Mandolin user MontanaMatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    1,253

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    I just got done with our first gig with all band members using the stroboclip hd with individual sweeteners, and it could be observational bias, but things fit better, and all parts seemed to blend and fit in the mix nice. We are a four piece; mando, guitar, banjo, bass. The intuitive reading of the strobe made everyone get there asap. This is probably better suited to be in a Peterson thread, but having the whole band tune with the same rigs and the same precision was very revealing.
    2007 Weber Custom Elite "old wood"
    2017 Ratliff R5 Custom #1148
    Several nice old Fiddles
    2007 Martin 000-15S 12 fret Auditorium-slot head
    Deering Classic Open Back
    Too many microphones

    BridgerCreekBoys.com

  11. #33
    Registered User Ivan Kelsall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Manchester - Lancashire - NW England
    Posts
    14,187

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Back in 1966 - 70 when i had my band together (banjo / mandolin / guitar & bass fiddle),i used & still use a 'G' tuning fork to tune my banjo. When we got together for either a practice or a gig,i'd check my banjo with the tuning fork & the others would tune up to me.
    We never sounded out of tune -ever.

    Traditionally,the Oboe was used to produce a clean note for a whole orchestra to tune up to,so tuning 3 other instruments to my banjo was pretty easy & effective,
    Ivan
    Weber F-5 'Fern'.
    Lebeda F-5 "Special".
    Stelling Bellflower BANJO
    Tokai - 'Tele-alike'.
    Ellis DeLuxe "A" style.

  12. The following members say thank you to Ivan Kelsall for this post:


  13. #34
    Registered User DavidKOS's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    North CA
    Posts
    5,050

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by sblock View Post
    Folks have been complaining about 12TET (12-tone, equal temperament) for centuries, it seems. Get over it, people, I say! If you intend to play Western-style music in more than just one key with others, or if you want to play a fretted instrument, or a keyboard instrument, for that matter, then you'd best stop all the whining and just get used to the minor idiosyncracies of 12TET. It's the only practical, versatile solution.:
    Amen, although you're preaching to the choir in my case.

    Unless you are playing Turkish, Arabic, or some other form of music that uses some form of just intonation - and no harmony per se - in a few related key centers, then you can use "pure" tuning.

    Other than that, make peace with the 12th root of 2!

  14. #35

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    You can tune the second string by ear only if you can hear it. I'm usually trying to tune in a noisy setting so I rely on my tuner a lot.

  15. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    2,573

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    Thanks.
    and I bet y'all played in G an awful lot!
    You're right, at least G position. Capoed to A and B, but that is the keys most bluegrass is played in, sometimes a D,E, or F maybe an occasional C, heavy use of capo. True not a lot of minors but then again not used a lot in bluegrass. What is wrong with tuning that best suits the music you're playing. If playing different music I would probably "sweeten" the tuning differently.

  16. The following members say thank you to Mandoplumb for this post:


  17. #37
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by Mandoplumb View Post
    You're right, at least G position. Capoed to A and B, but that is the keys most bluegrass is played in, sometimes a D,E, or F maybe an occasional C, heavy use of capo. True not a lot of minors but then again not used a lot in bluegrass. What is wrong with tuning that best suits the music you're playing. If playing different music I would probably "sweeten" the tuning differently.
    The problem here, which you may be missing somewhat, is that "sweetening" only works for fixing up a single key (or perhaps a few related keys). At the same time, it makes other keys sound worse! So yes, if you only play out of G positions on a guitar with a a capo, sweetening can work very well. Ditto for the 5-string banjo. But on the mandolin, you don't usually use a capo. And sweetening for the key of A makes things really bad for the key of B. Sweetening for G messes up D. And so on. So unless you're prepared to retune every time you switch keys, it's not a practical way to go with the mandolin. Better to stick with the best compromise, which is 12TET. And that holds equally well for bluegrass as it does for other types of music. This is not a "bluegrass" thing: it's a a (Western) musical thing.

  18. The following members say thank you to sblock for this post:


  19. #38
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    2,573

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Maybe our terminology is different, what I refer to as sweeten, Dad used to call splitting the difference. If a string sounded sharp in a certain chord you flatten it ever so slightly in one chord so it was ever so slightly sharp in the other instead of dead on in one and way sharp in the other. For instant the B string on a guitar open dead on with a tuner will sound sharp when noted for the D, so you split the difference. This would correct a problem stated by sblock not create one. I would not make one chord so "perfect" that it destroyed another. And I disagree that the music you are playing doesn't matter, that it is a western thing. Sweeting the B string as stated may make a C4th dim sound terrible but if you never use it in the music you play what does it matter.

  20. The following members say thank you to Mandoplumb for this post:


  21. #39
    Mandolin user MontanaMatt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Location
    Bozeman, MT
    Posts
    1,253

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by MontanaMatt View Post
    I just got done with our first gig with all band members using the stroboclip hd with individual sweeteners, and it could be observational bias, but things fit better, and all parts seemed to blend and fit in the mix nice. We are a four piece; mando, guitar, banjo, bass. The intuitive reading of the strobe made everyone get there asap. This is probably better suited to be in a Peterson thread, but having the whole band tune with the same rigs and the same precision was very revealing.
    After a few gigs with the Stroboclip, my guitar player started using the capo function and noticed it's beneficial adjustment when capoed...so I used it on s few songs in B with my mando, pretending I was capoed in b, sure enough, things sounded awesome. Sblock's comment about having to adjust for each capo move is mute, as guitar and banjo need to tune for capo changes anyway, so the only extra time it to hit the capo adjust button on the Peterson.
    The change in tone is very noticeable, even if only to us, our biggest critics.
    Happy pickin, and tuning!
    2007 Weber Custom Elite "old wood"
    2017 Ratliff R5 Custom #1148
    Several nice old Fiddles
    2007 Martin 000-15S 12 fret Auditorium-slot head
    Deering Classic Open Back
    Too many microphones

    BridgerCreekBoys.com

  22. #40

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    Quote Originally Posted by DavidKOS View Post
    "This has to do with "untempering" the 12TET tuning that tuners use."

    Well said....

    This seems to be about a different issue than how dry or wet we tune the pairs of strings.

    So-called "sweetened" tuning schemes are designed to allow instruments designed for 12 tone equal temperament tuning (12TET) to sound more like systems such as mean-tone tuning... in a few closely related keys.

    For centuries many keyboard instruments such as pipe organs were tuned to various tunings that were NOT 12TET.

    Mostly what bothers string players - I've seen this issue on regular guitar and steel guitar forums - is the 3rds, which is why I mentioned mean-tone tuning.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meantone_temperament

    "by choosing an appropriate size for the tempered fifths, may produce a perfect major third or a perfect minor third, but not both at the same time."

    It's those 3rds that seem to need "sweetening", as long as you play basic chords and do not get too far away on the circle of 5ths.

    Just intonation is another system:

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Just_intonation

    Anyway, this is a different rabbit hole!
    David...listened to your music....wide range...nicely done!

  23. #41
    Registered User Eric Platt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    St. Paul, MN
    Posts
    2,060

    Default Re: Tuning the pairs: 100% unison, or ... ?

    This is a great discussion. Even though I've only been playing mandolin for 6 months I immediately went for the Sam Bush method to tune the second string of the course by ear. Usually go for a unison sound, but will occasionally accept a slightly wet sound. Depending on who I'm playing with. When there is more than one accordion, then I find a slight wetness makes things sound more cohesive. Been using the Korg Sledgehammer Pro as I like the display best, but the Pederson and Polytune also work well.

    Then again, the other mandolin player in our group uses an older model Intelli tuner and his accuracy is no different than mine.

    Thing is, on guitar, my method has always been use a tuner, then make the G note on the E strings in tune with the open G and the D note on the B string to be in tune with the open D. It's just the way I like the compromise.
    Brentrup Model 23, Boeh A5 #37, Gibson A Jr., Flatiron 1N, Coombe Classical flattop, Strad-O-Lin
    https://www.facebook.com/LauluAika/
    https://www.lauluaika.com/
    https://www.facebook.com/Longtine-Am...14404553312723

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •