Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Dusted off my old Martin D18 yesterday and decided to see how it sounded plugged in. I've not plugged it in for years as it has a 3.5mm Switchcraft socket and I couldn't find a suitable lead. Anyhow, I plugged it into my Acoustic Image combo through a Sansamp Para-Driver preamp and, with very little tweaking, it sounded half decent - certainly better than the last time I tried it; probably in the days before acoustic amps!

    This got me thinking as to how (or whether) modern day piezzo pickups compare (are better) than those first generation ones some of us bought. The pickup in the Martin is a Barcus Berry which I simply glued with epoxy (as you did!), to the bridge plate, 40+ years ago. Just a little sliver of black plastic about an inch long and 3/16 inch wide.

    I hate to think how much it cost me in todays money.

  2. #2
    Registered User almeriastrings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Almeria, Spain
    Posts
    5,448
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    The answer is "not really". There have been a few improvements resulting in better consistency of the base material, but the really big improvement has been that of understanding the best kind of input circuits to use with them. The very early (e.g., Barcus Berry) preamps were on the right track (a single high impedance FET transistor) but now we know a lot more about optimum impedances, headroom requirements, special processing and so on to make them sound much better.
    Gibson F5 'Harvey' Fern, Gibson F5 'Derrington' Fern
    Distressed Silverangel F 'Esmerelda' aka 'Maxx'
    Northfield Big Mon #127
    Ellis F5 Special #288
    '39 & '45 D-18's, 1950 D-28.

  3. #3
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO & Chesterfield, MO
    Posts
    2,562

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    I think the real improvement has been in pre-amps to go with them. I think a lot of people would get a piezo installed and then plug it in directly to their amp and let it quack away. Now many use (or should use) a good DI for impedance matching and will get much better sound, even with a piezo from 30 years ago.

  4. The following members say thank you to colorado_al for this post:


  5. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    I suspected as much, so it's largely down to the Sansamp, which has an input impedance of 4.7 Meg., then. I remember dismembering one of their early "preamps" with a electronics-wiz friend at the time and being struck with how little there was in the box - simply a FET buffer. I assume I was lucky with the positioning of the pickup.

    Come to think of it, I remember a " build your own electric guitar" magazine article back in the 60s which was based on a telephone handset - basically a piezzo pickup.
    Last edited by Ray(T); Aug-24-2017 at 11:36am.

  6. #5
    Registered User Tavy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Tavistock UK
    Posts
    4,454

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Just to add that depending how much you used, epoxy probably wasn't the best glue to use, these days super glue (gel) would probably produce a truer result... other than that I know nothing about how the piezo tech has changed if at all. That said, epoxy probably has a longer lifespan than superglue which can often be brittle

  7. #6
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    The piezo material (PZT) has not changed in all these years. As others have said - correctly! - the main improvement has come from the pre-amps, which require very high input impedance and lots of headroom to do a faithful job. I don't think it matters much whether you used epoxy or of cyanoacrylate glue to hold it on, either, so long as the layer was reasonably thin.

    The final considerations are the size, shape, and placement of the piezo pickup. These all have a significant effect on sound. My own inclination, if I were starting from scratch -- which you're not! -- would be to go with a rounder pickup shape, and not a 1" x 3/16" rectangle, and to try some positions elsewhere before deciding on a permanent location (although somewhere on the bridge plate is a very popular spot for a guitar). But if you are happy with the sound on your guitar, just declare victory and move on! ;-)

  8. #7

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    I happen to live close to a true pickup wizard, Teddy Randazzo, who started out many years ago trying to refine the FRAP pickup concept. Not getting the results he wanted, he started clean and developed what is now the Dazzo pickup, which I now have in five guitars. The main distinguishing factor from something like a K&K is he makes pickups with varying degrees of bass response, so once you have the correct pickups for your instrument, you need no EQ. None. Plug into a 1MEG ohm or higher device and play.

    There is also some sound generated from the sides of the pickup. Multi source systems using a high quality mic with a piezo can be very realistic, but for my needs, the Dazzos work fine. Bummer that they can only be fixed to the top of the front plate of a mandolin. I may put them in my Arches kit build before gluing the top but it would be a roll of the dice.

    Other really good products come from Trance Audio and Pickup the World. It seems like the SF Bay area is a hotbed of innovation.

    If you like what you hear, play your guitar.

    Shout out to the RedEye preamps, but like in all cases, garbage in, garbage out.
    Silverangel A
    Arches F style kit
    1913 Gibson A-1

  9. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Quote Originally Posted by Tavy View Post
    Just to add that depending how much you used, epoxy probably wasn't the best glue to use, these days super glue (gel) would probably produce a truer result... other than that I know nothing about how the piezo tech has changed if at all. That said, epoxy probably has a longer lifespan than superglue which can often be brittle
    It was the mid 1970s and I'm not sure if Superglue was available or even around in those days. I'm aware that they did upgrade the pickup shortly afterwards and encapsulated the piezzo element in wood. I have one of those kicking around somewhere!

  10. #9

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    On a related topic, I have a qUick question for those in the know. My guitarist nephew recently got himself a Seymour Duncan sound hole pickup - one of those creamy-White bars that sits across the soundhole with individual pole pieces in it. He reckoned it sounded great (it didn't). At his insistence I put it on my D28 and played a few chords and runs - it was truly awful. Really quacky, and the treble strings were significantly louder than the 4 wound strings (I use Martin SP phosphor bronze 12s). It was plugged straight into an acoustic amp but sounded crap.

    Is this the fault of the pickup, or is it the fact that it was plugged straight into an amp?

    Thanks

    Johnny

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    I suspect that it's designed for steel rather than bronze strings with which only the cores are being picked up by the magnets in the pickup.

    Solution? - either change th strings or the pickup to something like a Fishman rare earth which is designed for bronze strings.

  12. The following members say thank you to Ray(T) for this post:


  13. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO & Chesterfield, MO
    Posts
    2,562

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny60 View Post
    On a related topic, I have a qUick question for those in the know. My guitarist nephew recently got himself a Seymour Duncan sound hole pickup - one of those creamy-White bars that sits across the soundhole with individual pole pieces in it. He reckoned it sounded great (it didn't). At his insistence I put it on my D28 and played a few chords and runs - it was truly awful. Really quacky, and the treble strings were significantly louder than the 4 wound strings (I use Martin SP phosphor bronze 12s). It was plugged straight into an acoustic amp but sounded crap.

    Is this the fault of the pickup, or is it the fact that it was plugged straight into an amp?

    Thanks

    Johnny
    I also think those are magnetic pickups. I think they are adjustable though, allowing you to move the pole closer or farther from each string. Would still benefit from a good DI/Preamp.

  14. #12
    but that's just me Bertram Henze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    0.8 mpc from NGC224, upstairs
    Posts
    10,075

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Didn't know they make pickups in Piezzo, Salerno, Italy
    the world is better off without bad ideas, good ideas are better off without the world

  15. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    High Peak - UK
    Posts
    4,191

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Thought they were from Piza?

    OK "Piezo" then.

  16. The following members say thank you to Ray(T) for this post:


  17. #14

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Quote Originally Posted by Ray(T) View Post
    It was the mid 1970s and I'm not sure if Superglue was available or even around in those days. I'm aware that they did upgrade the pickup shortly afterwards and encapsulated the piezzo element in wood. I have one of those kicking around somewhere!
    Superglue was discovered/invented in the 1940s and first sold commercially in 1958. Quite widely promoted by the 1970s.

  18. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    S.W. Wisconsin
    Posts
    7,532

    Default Re: Piezzo Pickups; Have They Improved ? (NMC)

    Quote Originally Posted by Johnny60 View Post
    On a related topic, I have a qUick question for those in the know. My guitarist nephew recently got himself a Seymour Duncan sound hole pickup - one of those creamy-White bars that sits across the soundhole with individual pole pieces in it. He reckoned it sounded great (it didn't). At his insistence I put it on my D28 and played a few chords and runs - it was truly awful. Really quacky, and the treble strings were significantly louder than the 4 wound strings (I use Martin SP phosphor bronze 12s). It was plugged straight into an acoustic amp but sounded crap.



    Is this the fault of the pickup, or is it the fact that it was plugged straight into an amp?

    Thanks

    Johnny
    Use something like a GHS white bronze or any electric string in the gauge you want and it will sound waaayyyy better. These are magnetic and only pick up the core of a bronze string. White bronze are magnetic and a great acoustic string.
    THE WORLD IS A BETTER PLACE JUST FOR YOUR SMILE!

  19. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pops1 For This Useful Post:


Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •