Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 51 to 71 of 71

Thread: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

  1. #51

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    "There are two types of countries, those that use the metric system, and those that have landed on the moon."


    Sorry I saw this yesterday and it made me think of this thread.
    '02 Gibson master model #70327 02-01-02
    '25 Gibson A-4 Snakehead #82626
    '06 Hicks #1 and #2 F-5 still not done

    Gibson F-5 Master Model Registry

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to carleshicks For This Useful Post:


  3. #52
    Registered User Nick Gellie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Orgiva, Spain
    Posts
    1,441

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Gosh three pages of posts to a simple question on Bill Monroe's mandolin's nut width containing imperial versus metric measurements. I would have thought that a measurement of 1 1/16" would suffice. Maybe that was what the luthiers in the Gibson factory were aiming for.
    Nic Gellie

  4. #53
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Aug 2013
    Location
    Va
    Posts
    2,573

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    How can one system be "more accurate" than another if both systems use numbers to infinity? Answer it cant be. One can be easier to learn, I won't even say easier to use if you learned inches first. I can't get the concept of a meter in this 64 year old head of mine.

  5. #54
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by carleshicks View Post
    "There are two types of countries, those that use the metric system, and those that have landed on the moon."

    Well, there's only one country that managed to crash a $125M Mars Climate Orbiter into the red planet in 1999, when a Lockheed engineer used English units (pounds of force) while everyone else at NASA was using the metric system (newtons)! Say, can you guess which country?!

    There is a reason for international standards. Ask any scientist.

    As for US/Imperial units, what a mess! Machinists have to keep going back and forth between fractions on an inch (8ths, 16ths, 32nds, 64ths, etc) and decimal inches (thousandths, ten-thousandths, etc.), and often have to resort to look-up tables just to find out what's going on. Those silly fractions are an awkward legacy of the 18th century, from a time when measurements were rather crude, and before the modern lathe and mill were invented!

  6. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to sblock For This Useful Post:


  7. #55
    Registered User Timbofood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI.
    Posts
    7,487

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    CW, what watches have you designed?
    Retired watch dealer and mechanical movement nut!
    Timothy F. Lewis
    "If brains was lard, that boy couldn't grease a very big skillet" J.D. Clampett

  8. The following members say thank you to Timbofood for this post:


  9. #56
    Registered User CWRoyds's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    San Rafael, Ca
    Posts
    700

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Timbofood View Post
    CW, what watches have you designed?
    Retired watch dealer and mechanical movement nut!
    Hey Tim,

    Sent you a message.

    Carleton
    Mandolins: Northfield 5-Bar Artist Model "Old Dog", J Bovier F5 Special, Gibson A-00 (1940)
    Fiddles: 1920s Strad copy, 1930s Strad copy, Liu Xi T20, Liu Xi T19+ Dark.
    Guitars: Taylor 514c (1995), Gibson Southern Jumbo (1940s), Gibson L-48 (1940s), Les Paul Custom (1978), Fender Strat (Black/RWFB) (1984), Fender Strat (Candy Apple Red/MFB) (1985).
    Sitars: Hiren Roy KP (1980s), Naskar (1970s), Naskar (1960s).
    Misc: 8 Course Lute (L.K.Brown)

  10. #57
    Registered User Timbofood's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Kalamazoo, MI.
    Posts
    7,487

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Thanks, interesting "non mandolin" life you have there!
    Timothy F. Lewis
    "If brains was lard, that boy couldn't grease a very big skillet" J.D. Clampett

  11. #58
    Registered User j. condino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Asheville, NC
    Posts
    2,767

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    1975
    The Metric Conversion Act of 1975 (Public Law 94-168) passed by Congress. The Metric Act established the U.S. Metric Board to coordinate and plan the increasing use and voluntary conversion to the metric system.

    1982
    President Ronald Reagan disbanded the U.S. Metric Board and canceled its funding.

    1991
    President George H. W. Bush signed Executive Order 12770, Metric Usage in Federal Government Programs directing all executive departments and federal agencies implement the use of the metric system.

    August 2017
    Mandoplumb

    "I agree Jeff. This digital crap in photography, recording, and measurement is a whole lot of what is wrong with the world."

    You kids get off my lawn.....

  12. The following members say thank you to j. condino for this post:


  13. #59
    Rush Burkhardt Rush Burkhardt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Towson, MD
    Posts
    327

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Hate to distract from the inches/meters controversy...

    In 1969, at Berryville Bluegrass Festival I bought a Randy Wood 37' F-12 from Rual Yarborough. Mr. Monroe, sitting across the parking lot, played my mandolin and I played his. We compared fret board and nut width and they were virtually IDENTICAL. My fretboard and nut measure 1" (25.4mm). At 75, the neck, which was once, perfect for me, is a little narrow. I prefer a little 37' A1 with a conversion by Lou Stiver. The fretboard and nut measure 1 1/8" (28.575); that width and a slight radius make a huge difference!
    Rush Burkhardt
    Towson, MD


    Free opinions are worth exactly what you pay for them!

  14. The following members say thank you to Rush Burkhardt for this post:


  15. #60
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Thanks for the very informative post, Rush...a good contrubution to the thread for sure. i'll keep your neck width wisdom in mind.

    i'm grateful to Henry and Adrian for sharing their drawings, and i hope someone will be able to share a July 9, 1923 neck profile as well. Not knowing if there is a difference in the neck profiles of the side bound and top bound mandolins from that batch, i think i'll keep looking for a side bound drawing.

    There are so many excellent folks who graciously share their knowldege here. This is an amazing website. Many thanks to Scott and all y'all......dan

  16. #61
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by sblock View Post
    Well, there's only one country that managed to crash a $125M Mars Climate Orbiter into the red planet in 1999, when a Lockheed engineer used English units (pounds of force) while everyone else at NASA was using the metric system (newtons)! Say, can you guess which country?!

    There is a reason for international standards. Ask any scientist.

    As for US/Imperial units, what a mess! Machinists have to keep going back and forth between fractions on an inch (8ths, 16ths, 32nds, 64ths, etc) and decimal inches (thousandths, ten-thousandths, etc.), and often have to resort to look-up tables just to find out what's going on. Those silly fractions are an awkward legacy of the 18th century, from a time when measurements were rather crude, and before the modern lathe and mill were invented!
    Well actually,

    A. A country that can crash an orbiter on Mars means that it can at least engineer getting an object to that part of the universe -- so there is that and,

    B. Why call it a "US" system? The inches/feet/yards/furlongs/ounces/pounds/tons/degrees F were all developed by the British correct?

    Finally, as a lifelong scientist I use both systems and do not generally have any confusion about 98.6 F versus 37 C or 1 mile versus 1.61 km and it is hardly worth all the concern.

    Traditionally the "English system" made good practical sense for humans 1 ~ the first knuckle on a the average finger, 1 foot ~ the average foot; one yard ~ an averaged stride.

    FYI: The nut width on my 2001 Gibson Sam Bush mandolin is 301,000,000 Angstroms.
    Last edited by Bernie Daniel; Oct-08-2017 at 7:28pm.
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  17. The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Bernie Daniel For This Useful Post:


  18. #62

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    The first place I ever heard of angstroms was in the movie Andromeda Strain.

  19. #63
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Jim Hilburn View Post
    The first place I ever heard of angstroms was in the movie Andromeda Strain.
    Angstrom = one ten millionth of a millimeter they come in handy if your are measuring electromagnetic wavelengths or intra-atomic distances with your plastic ruler from Home Depot!
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  20. #64
    wood butcher Spruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orcas Island, Washington
    Posts
    6,172

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    I hope they calculated how many angstroms the missing binding was before calculating the width of the nut...


  21. #65

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    I wonder why he replaced the fingerboard? Those frets don't look too bad!

  22. #66
    Certified! Bernie Daniel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
    Posts
    8,347
    Blog Entries
    4

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by Spruce View Post
    I hope they calculated how many angstroms the missing binding was before calculating the width of the nut...


    That is such a cool photo -- I can clearly seen Bill Monroe's DNA on there!
    Bernie
    ____
    Due to current budgetary restrictions the light at the end of the tunnel has been turned off -- sorry about the inconvenience.

  23. #67
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Could somebody take a measurement of the end of the board at the nut, with and without binding in that pic, please? Feel free to use the system of your choice....just sayin'.

  24. #68
    wood butcher Spruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orcas Island, Washington
    Posts
    6,172

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Quote Originally Posted by dan in va View Post
    Could somebody take a measurement of the end of the board at the nut, with and without binding in that pic, please? Feel free to use the system of your choice....just sayin'.
    See:

    Quote Originally Posted by dan in va View Post
    I just received another gracious e-mail from Walter Carter. I was wondering if the wood at the nut (excluding binding) on the old BM fretboard and their July 9 '23 Loar had the same measurement. To quote, "Both fretboards are 1 1/32" at the nut." I reckon this info ought to suit everyone out there, no?

  25. #69
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    i seem to recall that previous post, but i don't know 'xactly which fretboard is pictured just above. Maybe it's the one in the nifty box at Carter's or maybe something else. i wonder how many boards that famous July 9, 1923 mandolin had over its life w/Mr. Monroe. Maybe they were all the same size, or maybe a hair or two different. As for how many angstroms difference there might be from one picker's hair to another, i dunno that either.

  26. #70
    Registered User Hendrik Ahrend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Leer, Northern Germany
    Posts
    1,555

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    The one pictured just above is the one at Carter's, the AFAIK original Gibson finger board, which was tossed in the saw dust in the early '70s by Randy Wood.

  27. #71
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: nut width of BM's July 9 1923 mandolin?

    Don Macrostie was super kind and generous to send some data on a 7/9/23 F5 whose fret board at the nut measured 1.090". There does indeed seem to be some variation. This makes me wonder how much the builders used templates at Gibson. Thanks ever so much, Don!

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •