Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

  1. #1
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    4,881

    Default One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    Id there any difference to the sound of a mandolin with a one piece back compared to a book matched one? Or is there a reason for not doing a one piece back except for having to find a larger piece of wood to allow a person to make one?

    Willie

  2. #2
    harvester of clams Bill McCall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Forest Grove, Oregon
    Posts
    2,797

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    I can't see a mechanical reason for a sonic difference between a 1 or 2 piece back. Aestheticly for striped maple I prefer a good book match to 1 piece, but for Birdseye maple I have no preference. Ymmv

    I would suspect in manufacturing the cost of wider material is a significant difference.
    Not all the clams are at the beach

    Arrow Manouche
    Arrow Jazzbo
    Arrow G
    Clark 2 point
    Gibson F5L
    Gibson A-4
    Ratliff CountryBoy A

  3. #3
    wood butcher Spruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orcas Island, Washington
    Posts
    6,172

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    Quote Originally Posted by Bill McCall View Post

    I would suspect in manufacturing the cost of wider material is a significant difference.
    ...a tad higher, but I wouldn't say "significant"...

  4. #4

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    I have a one-piece on my old(#61) Red Diamond as per my request. It is rather plainer looking than many two-piecers I have seen.

    The two-piece back on my F5 Gibson is not "book-matched" but quite asymmetrical;again,as per my request.

    Guess I just got tired of seeing the killer striped maple backs;wanted to be different. No sonic reasoning on my part;nor
    do my old tin ears detect any difference in tone that I can relate to one vs. two-piece backs.

  5. #5
    Registered User Hendrik Ahrend's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Leer, Northern Germany
    Posts
    1,555

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    The main reason for two piece backs (book matched, slip matched or not really matched at all) is that narrow pieces of maple are more frequent and thus cheaper to come by. Now that it's an old tradition, most of us love two piece backs. A well executed glue seam could never make a difference, I believe, much less an audible one, or one for the better or worse.

  6. #6
    Registered User sblock's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Redwood City, CA
    Posts
    2,335

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    The broad consensus of opinion among players and luthiers is that there is no difference in the tone associated with a one- or two-piece mandolin back. You may find a few who disagree, but they are decidedly in the minority.

    Folks are split, however, about which one looks better. Some love seeing the book-matching. Some love seeing the contiguous piece of maple.

  7. #7
    Registered User fscotte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Zanesville, Ohio
    Posts
    2,490

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    I don't see a reason why there'd be a tonal difference. I mainly use one pice backs to avoid the extra work of gluing the back wedges together. I also happen to like the look, and my lumber store has pallets of curly hard maple from Michigan of which I can choose my own.

  8. The following members say thank you to fscotte for this post:


  9. #8
    Registered User mtucker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Los Angeles CA
    Posts
    1,500

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    one-piece, two-piece...they all look delicious to me! What's for supper!

    purloined from the Gilchrist website 'current builds'. http://www.gilchristmandolins.com/current/
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	plates.jpg 
Views:	119 
Size:	136.2 KB 
ID:	157771  

  10. #9
    Registered User fox's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2014
    Location
    Guernsey... small island just off the coast of France
    Posts
    1,764

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    Everybody deserves to own at least one of each!

  11. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    i asked Chris Stanley what his experience was about this issue some 5 years ago when planning an A5. What i got from the conversation was the cost difference was significant and no real difference in sound. He also said his mandolins that had that little extra something seemed to have 2 piece backs. There was an F5 with both one piece top and back that didn't suit him at all. #62 is my only mandolin now, and some other good custom numbers have come and gone (late '80's KM 1000, '25 snakehead, Smart A5, CE Ward A5), and i've played some really good high end stuff, but this one just seems to suit me best. The Stanley just gets better every year and it's become less particular about strings and picks, too.

  12. #11
    wood butcher Spruce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Orcas Island, Washington
    Posts
    6,172

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    Quote Originally Posted by dan in va View Post
    i asked Chris Stanley what his experience was about this issue some 5 years ago when planning an A5. What i got from the conversation was the cost difference was significant...
    Man, folks need to question their choice of tonewood dealers...

    I said it wasn't significant before, but in reality it's the same cost per board foot, especially if you are buying lumber...
    10" wide boards are not all that uncommon in figured Eastern maple piles, but keep in mind that we're talking slab-sawn material, which is all you are going to find in Eastern...

    What is rare--and should be surcharged for--are one-piece backs cut on the quarter, regardless of species...
    Now that's a hard piece of wood to come by, for a variety of reasons...

  13. The following members say thank you to Spruce for this post:


  14. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    central VA
    Posts
    934

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    Well, i 'spose i should've clarified that Chris and i were talking in the context of quarter sawn wood. i didn't even consider that when posting. Thanks for making the point, Spruce.

  15. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    4,806

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    I like the one piece back on my Silverangel Econo, but I can't say i prefer one or the other consistently. It really depends on the mandolin. Intentionally unbookmatched two pieced backs seem to be more polarizing for me. I tend to either really like them, or really not care for them. That said, if I found one that had the tone and feel, I'd buy it...don't really ever have to look at the back anyway, unless you just want to
    Chuck

  16. #14
    Registered User fscotte's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Zanesville, Ohio
    Posts
    2,490

    Default Re: One piec back as compared to a book matched one

    There is no cost difference in one piece or two piece maple- at least where I buy from. What costs more is the best figure vs good figure. Now you may run into some significant cost increase if you're looking at woods that are rare to get wide enough for a one piece back.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •