Re: Eastman md415 info.
Robert et. al., what is considered the advantage of a mahogany-bodied mandolin?
I have a nice little Martin Style A with mahogany back and sides, and I'm very partial to it, but the "industry standard" is maple -- and, if you're not looking only for strongly-figured maple, there must be a lot of that around. And it doesn't need to be imported from the tropics.
Seems to be consensus that the sound of a mahogany body is "a little muted," as Robert says, and in a carved-top, f-hole instrument, presumably largely aimed at the bluegrass crowd, "muted" ain't a virtue. They want "bark," "woof," and a treble that overcomes the banjo player.
So why build 'em? We've pretty much seen the demise -- for a variety of reasons -- of the rosewood-bodied mandolin, although that was extremely common in the bowl-back era. Why not just stick to maple?
Allen Hopkins
Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
Natl Triolian Dobro mando
Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
H-O mandolinetto
Stradolin Vega banjolin
Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
Flatiron 3K OM
Bookmarks