Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 30 of 30

Thread: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

  1. #26
    Registered User Geno's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    McGaheysville, Virginia
    Posts
    79

    Default Re: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

    I like the grippy PT's, with the grippy removed, better than the smoothies. Non-rehabilitated TS pick users should try them. Just sand off the grippy pebbles, reshape the bevels, and buff with Meguiar's- and you will be amazed and sleep better. I really love those 1.4 large triangles, with one corner rounded off, and with monel strings.

  2. #27
    Mediocre but OK with that Paul Busman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Frederick,MD
    Posts
    1,905

    Default Re: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

    I use the heavier Primetones on my mandolin and love them. For my tenor banjo I like something with more flex though. How much flex do the .73 Primetones have? The Jim Dunlop site says the Primetones are made of Ultex-- apart from color is this the exact same Ultex as their regular Ultex picks? Those come as thin as .6.
    For wooden musical fun that doesn't involve strumming, check out:
    www.busmanwhistles.com
    Handcrafted pennywhistles in exotic hardwoods.

  3. #28
    Adrian Minarovic
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Banska Bystrica, Slovakia, Europe
    Posts
    1,754

    Default Re: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

    I found that if you shape the picks exactly the same and material is "close enough" then they will sound the same. Celluloid, ultex (polyetherimide), polyimide etc are very similar at 1.5mm stiff polished to shiny and tend to wear to shiny new surface. The only difference is how fast they wear. (and even that can be highly personal thing - some folks can wear BC significantly in a year or so) Most folks compare picks as they come from manufacturers and slightly different angle of bevels can produce different tone.
    I've been making my own picks and have used celluloid and reshaped many other materials to my personal taste and I found out that at least 90% of the result is in the exact shape.
    Adrian

  4. #29
    Registered User Mike Snyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Neosho, Mo
    Posts
    2,213

    Default Re: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

    I am a working man and I own four BC picks. Money spent on playing music is well spent. Much cheaper than therapy. Big fat tone, minimal click, fast. Triplets on the F5 with a BC 100, terrific. Loud chop. The new CT55 makes the A4 sing. Prime tones are nice and picks are a personal preference thing, but I am a BC believer
    Mike Snyder

  5. #30
    Registered User Ivan Kelsall's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Manchester - Lancashire - NW England
    Posts
    12,619

    Default Re: Weird thing about the Jim Dunlop Primetone Picks

    I re-worked a second 2mm thick Primetone 'teardrop' shaped pick yesterday for use with my Weber 'Fern'. The Weber has always been a tad on the bright side of things,so,i rounded the tip of the pick off slightly,reduced the width of the bevel & then buffed it up to smooth it off. It worked perfectly. The more rounded tip reduces the treble just enough,& the thicker pick adds a bit more punch to the sound. I'd been using a 1.5 mm thick teardrop shaped pick 'as it came',but this re-shaped 2 mm one is perfect !
    Ivan
    Weber F-5 'Fern'.
    Lebeda F-5 "Special".
    Stelling Bellflower BANJO
    Tokai - 'Tele-alike'.
    Ellis DeLuxe "A" style.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •