Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

  1. #1
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Smile Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Hi, I'm french and I play mandolin for a few years now on an Epiphone MM-30. It was a good mandolin for beginning but I want to buy another one with solid top, back and sides. I've seen two models and I really hesistate between these two : the Loar 220VS (solid spruce) and the Gretsch G9310 (all solid mahogany). Unforntunately they are no feedbacks on those on the web and I can't make my mind on them. What do you think ? I play alone and I most play traditionnal Irish music (jigs, reels, etc...). Thank you for your help and I know that they are good brands to buy but you know, in France there is no choice in mandolin brands.

  2. #2
    Senior Member OldGus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    248

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    I recommend the LM220. I have played one of those. It had good balance between chords and lead runs, good tone, and also had pretty good tuners but it doesn't always come with a case so you might have to buy one separately.

  3. #3
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Thank you for your answer. Does the Loar you tried have a loud sound ? And what do you think of the handcraft quality ?

  4. #4
    Senior Member OldGus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    248

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    It's a little hard to remember, I'd say it was adequately loud and a good basic mandolin. The quality was very good for the low price. I think I liked it better than the used Kentucky KM900 that was next to it although that one needed a setup. That one hasn't sold but the LM220 is gone, they are a great value. The KM900 sounded better on chop chords but didn't hold the same volume on lead runs in my opinion and in this example. The LM220 was more well rounded in volume and response, chops well and has better tuners, I like this model and might pick one up myself but I already have a high price custom A5. I'd say it carries a bit of a violin tone vibe with the Englemann top lending to a nice mellow sound. It's the best I have played in that price range.

  5. #5
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    The description you make of the sound is very interesting. This Loar 220 seems to be a great mandolin for a medium player like me ! This is the kind of instrument I'm looking for. Thank you for you feedback. Have you heard or seen the new all mahogany Gretsch ?

  6. #6
    Senior Member OldGus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    248

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Since you stated volume as a concern I would stray away from that one. I wouldn't expect much volume from a mahogany topped mandolin. The closest I've played was a Bean Blossom about five years ago, it was pretty good for the price at the time but I would go for the LM220 myself. It's a great mandolin for the money in my experience.

  7. #7
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Sure, you're right. Mahogany wood sounds smoother and softer than the spruce but the sound is sometimes richer. I think it depends a lot of the strings you use. I don't know exactly wich strings fit better for playing irish but the sound must be percussive/punchy and sensitive. I usually play with D'Addario J74 and I love them on my Epiphone with massive spruce top. I guess those strings wouldn't sound as loud on a mahogany mandolin but perhaps the sound would be more subtle (?).

  8. #8
    Robert Fear Folkmusician.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    I have not seen a Gretsch G9310 in person, but having some experience with all Mahogany mandolins, I would point you toward the LM-220. Like OldGus, I feel it is a great deal. In my opinion it is currently the best mandolin at the price point.

    The tone on the Gretsch should be more subtle, or you could say muted.
    Robert Fear
    http://www.folkmusician.com
    1-800-493-4922

    "Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't.
    " - Pete Seeger

  9. #9
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    So I think I'll go for the Loar. Thank you for your advices ! By the way, what is the advantage of making mandolin with mahogany ? I know that mahogany is a beautiful wood with a mellow sound but is this quality compatible with mandolin playing sound ? If you play alone, at your home, mahogany can be a great choice so why do they make mandolin with mahogany if this wood isn't a good choice for this instrument ?

  10. #10
    Senior Member OldGus's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Posts
    248

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Mahogany is an excellent tone wood, the advantages are the ones you cited but the disadvantages are the ones we cited. I think an all mahogany mandolin will be a double whammy against volume but it could have great tone with the right craftsmanship. That being said I think the craftsmanship and tone will be better on the LM220. Mahogany sounds good on banjos and dreadnaught guitars but they are much larger generally louder to begin with. Mandolins gain their edge by being higher pitched and cutting through(although some are open and loud) which I think mahogany would generally hinder rather than help. There are some exceptions, I don't think this Gretsch will be one though. I am all about alternative woods, try a walnut mandolin if you get the chance, but at the low end price I would keep it basic like "The Loar".

  11. #11
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Yes, that is what I think. Mahogany isn't really for mandolin, this wood make the sound muted on this instrument. And that isn't the size but the pitch as you said. On Ukuleles (lower pitch), Mahogany is a great wood and lot of ukulele players loves the tone of mahogany. But I'll go for the "The Loar" mandolin with its solide and loudy spruce top and maple back and sides ! I'm looking for a loud and clear sound !

  12. #12
    bon vivant jaycat's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    Boston, Mass.
    Posts
    801

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Quote Originally Posted by OldGus View Post
    . . .Mahogany sounds good on banjos and dreadnaught guitars . . .
    Oh yeah! My Guild D25M is the nuts. Clear as a bell and as loud as you want it to be.

    Bonne chance, helric, et bienvenue au Cafe!
    "The paths of experimentation twist and turn through mountains of miscalculations, and often lose themselves in error and darkness!"

    --Leslie Daniel, "The Brain That Wouldn't Die."

  13. #13
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Quote Originally Posted by jaycat View Post
    Bonne chance, helric, et bienvenue au Cafe!
    Merci pour ces quelques mots de bienvenue en français jaycat !

  14. #14
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    A friend let me play today his Kentucky KM-172 and I must say that I was very impressed with this instrument. I found the sound loud and mellow and I must admit that I love that ! Does anyone knows how the Loar 220 sounds compare to the Kentucky 160/171 series ? I'm very curious to see how you think this series of Kentucky hold the comparison with the Loar !

  15. #15
    Robert Fear Folkmusician.com's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Reno, NV
    Posts
    1,610

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    The Kentucky 170 series has a much warmer, tubby sort of tone that is characteristic of the Oval hole mandolins. The LM-220 basically has a standard mandolin voice to it. The X bracing does not sound much different than Parallel bracing. The 160 series is great, but given the choice I would go with the LM-220 myself. If you like the oval hole tone, then the 170 is a top pick.
    Robert Fear
    http://www.folkmusician.com
    1-800-493-4922

    "Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't.
    " - Pete Seeger

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    1,899

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    I've played a couple of the old Gretsch New Yorkers and they were OK I thought. Kind of in the category of the better Stradolins as far as quality goes and they had their own distinctive sound, but not a mandolin that you could hear across a field if that is what your looking for. They were solid and a little heavy and played nicely. I've thought that I wouldn't mind having one. Now there is this retro-reissue that has recently shown up and all I've seen is the photos and advertisements and it looks like the old Gretsch but is it the same? The price is either really reasonable or suspiciously low.

  17. #17
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Quote Originally Posted by Folkmusician.com View Post
    The Kentucky 170 series has a much warmer, tubby sort of tone that is characteristic of the Oval hole mandolins. The LM-220 basically has a standard mandolin voice to it. The X bracing does not sound much different than Parallel bracing. The 160 series is great, but given the choice I would go with the LM-220 myself. If you like the oval hole tone, then the 170 is a top pick.
    I love the sound of this ovale hole mandolin, It fits well the irish/celtic music I love to play.

    Quote Originally Posted by barney 59 View Post
    The price is either really reasonable or suspiciously low.
    This product is new and there aren't a lot of feedbacks or reviews for now. It's difficult to say if this is reasonable or suspicious ! Time will tell

    So, I give me a little more time to make my choice. Choosing an instrument isn't an easy game to play sometimes ! ^^ Thank you for your answers and great feebacks, they help me !!

  18. #18
    Registered User helric's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    55

    Default Re: Gretsch G9310 NY Supreme VS. The Loar LM-220-VS

    Hmm, unfortunately I can get the Kentucky I wanted so I think I'll change for a LOAR 220 (perhaps 300). I won't be able to see or play it before I command it so I'd like to know if thoses Loar mandolins need a set up or if they're quite right from the factory. have anyone any experience of these mandolins "out of the box" ?

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •