It looks like it's never been played, wonderful to find one in this condition. It's a Uke-2, best guess before 1930. Even sounds a bit new. Intonation spot-on, great forward sound. Love the "The Gibson" ukes, they were the best.
![]()
It looks like it's never been played, wonderful to find one in this condition. It's a Uke-2, best guess before 1930. Even sounds a bit new. Intonation spot-on, great forward sound. Love the "The Gibson" ukes, they were the best.
![]()
How does it sound? Looks great ....
Breedlove OF
Schmergl Devastator
Sounds great, needs played in, I have it's twin as well as a '20s Uke-3, and they all have the characteristic sound, not as in your face like Martins, but a bit jazzy with good note separation. In defiance of the "vintage" rules, side dots, tasteful and small corresponding to the fretboard dots, are being installed.
Oh, that looks tasty.
UAS in high gear when I see something like this.
As far as I know, Gibson did not start making ukuleles until around 1926, so there's no such thing as a "Loar-era" uke. Still, it's a beautiful and pristine example of a 1920s uke.
Visit www.fox-guitars.com - cool Gibson & Epiphone history and more
You're close as can be, 1927 I've heard, so yep, out of the Loar period. But what better bait to get mandolin folks to look at a lowly uke!![]()
I got it, btw, it apears to have been kept in a case under a bed for 85 years in a temperate climate. The neck looks new-old stock. Sound is a little tight compared to my other 2 Gibsons of the same period, a Uke-3, and a brother to the one shown. I can not understand why they did not put side dots in any of their ukes, Martin did in the Style 3 and up. I did.
Bookmarks