Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 26 to 40 of 40

Thread: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

  1. #26
    Registered User Adam Sweet's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    South Hadley, MA
    Posts
    137

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Generally oval-hole mandolins are quieter than F-hole mandolins. That's a general statement. Of course it depends on the instrument.

  2. #27
    Professional Dreamer journeybear's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    Location
    Hayseed, Dixie
    Posts
    8,502
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Well, when you put it that way ... with those qualifiers, it's hard to say much. But I'll say just a bit anyway. My 1917 A is a LOT louder than my late lamented mid-70s F-12 ever was, and has a lot fuller and more complex sound, too. Of course, instruments vary, probably no such thing as a definitive example. But the A really booms. It's a banjo killer, and if not killer, then at least it will do some serious damage. My A-00 is an awful lot quieter. I don't know how much difference sound holes make in volume by themselves, but I can see they could be a contributing factor. I think given all these have carved tops, the flat back is a big factor. Anyway, lots of apples and oranges being mixed into this fruit salad.

    I'm looking forward to a report from the OP when he gets his new baby.
    But that's just my opinion. I could be wrong. - Dennis Miller

    Furthering Mandolin Consciousness

    Blues Mando Social Group
    Gibson Mandolins Social Group
    North Florida Mandolin Players Social Group

    Rundgren and Rothberg occupying nearly one point in the space-time continuum; this on the occasion of her birthday 5/4

  3. #28
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,673

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    My 1937 A-00 is plenty loud (ff holes and carved back: see evolution of specs above). The shorter scale does have an effect on the tone, but I like it. I have to say that I play old-time mostly, not much bluegrass. Ben at Fiddlers Green, who definitely plays bluegrass, pulled a pretty good sound out of it when he tried it out.
    Jammin' in South Austin with:
    '70's Shiro A
    '08 Weber Bighorn
    '37 Gibson A-00
    LeCapitaine Accordion
    Harmonica
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  4. #29
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    I have a couple questions about the A00 that is being shipped to me. The serial number in the A00 is #368A. Does the 8 stand for august of 1936 or the 8th mando built in 1936? Also, if it is a 1936, it should have a carved back, but the back has a seam that is splitting...do carved backs have seams? Thanks!

  5. #30
    Registered User lenf12's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Posts
    1,079

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Hi again Timmando,

    I can't address your serial # questions but someone more knowledgeable will hopefully chime in. 368A sounds like the FON (factory order number) to me, not a serial #. Re: your other questions: carved back and flat back mandolins can have a seam down the middle if they are made of 2 pieces of wood. They can also have a 1 piece back depending on whether there was a piece of wood big enough to make the back. Post a picture of the back when you recieve the mandolin. You may want to post it also on the builders/repair forum to get an opinion of how serious the split may be and whether it may need some professional attention.

    Len B.
    Clearwater, FL
    Last edited by lenf12; Jun-04-2012 at 3:22pm. Reason: add text

  6. #31
    Rush Burkhardt rbvintage's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Fripp Island, SC
    Posts
    44

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    As Allen mentioned earlier, Red Rector played, almost exclusively, an oval-holed Gibson A model...here's Red and friends with some classic bluegrass from 1983! Enjoy!


  7. #32
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,673

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Yes, your number is most probably a FON. My 1937 A-00 is stamped inside on the back 1 2 0 3 0(D?) with a penciled "13" after it. It is probably instrument #13 in the batch.
    Jammin' in South Austin with:
    '70's Shiro A
    '08 Weber Bighorn
    '37 Gibson A-00
    LeCapitaine Accordion
    Harmonica
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  8. #33
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Quote Originally Posted by Capt. E View Post
    Yes, your number is most probably a FON. My 1937 A-00 is stamped inside on the back 1 2 0 3 0(D?) with a penciled "13" after it. It is probably instrument #13 in the batch.
    Capt E...how do you know it is a 1937 A00...any other stamps on yours?

    The number on mine 368A seems to identify it as a 1936 model...do you think that is just a coincedence that a FON could have the year in it?
    Last edited by Timmando; Jun-05-2012 at 9:12am.

  9. #34
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,673

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Check out the following site for some pretty good info in Gibson serial numbers and FON's http://home.provide.net/~cfh/gibson.html

    The number in my A-00 actually looks like 12030, but according to the FON conventions, the last "digit" is probably a "C" or a "D". If it is a C, then it is a 1937 instrument, if it is a D then it is a 1938 instrument. My dating of my A-00 is based on the info in the above website and info from here on the cafe. Can't prove it, but I generally call it a 1937. It has an unbound, carved back which fits the specs for '37.
    Jammin' in South Austin with:
    '70's Shiro A
    '08 Weber Bighorn
    '37 Gibson A-00
    LeCapitaine Accordion
    Harmonica
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  10. #35
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,673

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Ok, I just got my A-00 out and looked reeeeeeaaal carefully at the number. It is definitely 1203C followed by a penciled "13".
    It is mandolin #13 out of FON 1203C made in 1937. In 1938 the letter ( D that year) was put before the FON.
    Jammin' in South Austin with:
    '70's Shiro A
    '08 Weber Bighorn
    '37 Gibson A-00
    LeCapitaine Accordion
    Harmonica
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  11. #36
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Florida, USA
    Posts
    308

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Here are some photos of the A00 that I just received. After new strings, lowered the action, lubed the tuners, she sounds pretty good. Lots of volume on the A and E, more than my Morgan Monroe MDM-2. Nice wide grain on the top, red spruce I presume? According to the serial number info given in a previous reply, the serial number 368A 20 is serial 368, the A stands for year 1935 and the 20 is the 20th built. So this is a 1935, not a 1936 as I thought.





  12. #37
    Registered User almeriastrings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Almeria, Spain
    Posts
    1,892

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Very nice.
    Gibson F5 'Harvey' Fern, Gibson F5 'Derrington' Fern
    Distressed Silverangel F 'Esmerelda' aka 'Maxx'
    Northfield Big Mon #127
    Ellis F5 Special #288
    '39 & '45 D-18's, 1950 D-28.

  13. #38
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    5,439

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    That is correct. the "A" in the FON started in 1935 with B being 1936 and C 1937 ect. It's not the serial no but he FON. Low end models did not carry a serial no. in addtion to the FON, only the FON. I guess you know the bridge is not original. It would have come with a Gibson rosewood adjustable bridge. 368 is batch no. 20 is 20th of that batch in 1935

  14. #39
    coprolite mandroid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Outer Spiral Arm, of Galaxy
    Posts
    11,103

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    one difference heel of neck comes up shorter, if you are shifting that 4 finger G chop chord up the neck.

    but it has all the notes on the fingerboard .. to play any style of music you want to tackle..
    writing about music
    is like dancing,
    about architecture

  15. #40
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    1,673

    Default Re: Why aren't Gibson A-00 mandolins good for bluegrass?

    Beautiful looking instrument. I and continuing to enjoy mineYours looks a lot better than mine which has been played hard over the years, bridge replaced, nut replaced, fret job on 1st 7, etc., I love the sound though.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	gibson A-00 015.jpg 
Views:	13 
Size:	191.5 KB 
ID:	88584
    Jammin' in South Austin with:
    '70's Shiro A
    '08 Weber Bighorn
    '37 Gibson A-00
    LeCapitaine Accordion
    Harmonica
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •