Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 25 of 84

Thread: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    This mandolin came into the shop yesterday with the scroll broken off of the head stock.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	1.jpg 
Views:	117 
Size:	90.7 KB 
ID:	79586   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	2.jpg 
Views:	143 
Size:	59.2 KB 
ID:	79587  

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    As you can see, it was mostly a clean seam separation, except for that disc of wood they put in there to "strengthen" the scroll.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	3.jpg 
Views:	93 
Size:	64.0 KB 
ID:	79588   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4.jpg 
Views:	78 
Size:	65.2 KB 
ID:	79589   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	5.jpg 
Views:	87 
Size:	58.8 KB 
ID:	79590  

    Last edited by sunburst; Dec-12-2011 at 2:28pm.

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    I didn't think to start taking pictures before I cleaned up the old glue (with De-Glue Goo), but it had been broken off before and re-glued with hide glue (thankfully!). There was no contact at the old seam, and only "stings" of glue between the pieces there. This is the best I could do to align the pieces.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	6.jpg 
Views:	79 
Size:	83.8 KB 
ID:	79591   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	7.jpg 
Views:	69 
Size:	62.5 KB 
ID:	79592  

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    The reason the gap wouldn't close is that biscuit of cross-grain wood in there. I chalked the head stock to improve the fit. You can see the chalk transfer that I got starting out. The edge of the biscuit is interfering with the fit and keeping the gap from closing.
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	8.jpg 
Views:	90 
Size:	82.0 KB 
ID:	79593   Click image for larger version. 

Name:	9.jpg 
Views:	105 
Size:	80.6 KB 
ID:	79594  

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Using files, scrapers, and small blades, I worked away the wood where the chalk transferred (chalk fit) until I had contact everywhere. (It's hard to see the chalk transfer because it is not heavy, but I'm satisfied that this is the best fit I can practically attain.)
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	10.jpg 
Views:	70 
Size:	87.3 KB 
ID:	79595  

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    As I type this, it looks like this, with a generous application of hot hide glue in the joint. The joint is nearly half end grain, though, and the fit, though the best I could practically attain, is not as good as two good, flat surfaces. I hope it doesn't get bumped hard again, because if it does, it's going to pop right back off of there!
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	11.jpg 
Views:	152 
Size:	100.4 KB 
ID:	79596  
    Last edited by sunburst; Dec-12-2011 at 3:34pm.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Sooo... do you really want to install one of those "strengtheners" in the peghead scroll? You've probably already guessed my opinion.

  8. #8
    Registered User Rob Grant's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    FNQ, Australia
    Posts
    1,033

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    John, I totally agree. That suggestion of a "biscuit" addition always looked like a waste of time. I basically strengthen the whole peghead by using slightly thicker veneers on the back and front. As I make my own veneers from local timbers, that's an easy option for me.

    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	KBFSide3.jpg 
Views:	106 
Size:	46.2 KB 
ID:	79606
    Rob Grant
    FarOutNorthQueensland,Oz
    http://www.grantmandolins.com

  9. #9
    Registered User Malcolm G.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Montreal, Quebec Canada
    Posts
    702

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Congratulations on your perseverance, John!

    And thanks for taking us amateurs along on this little trip.

    I love these tips n tricks.
    Malcolm Grundy from Montreal

  10. #10
    Registered User Max Girouard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Contoocook NH
    Posts
    541

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Thanks for the pictures and write up John, nice work!

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Portsmouth,Ohio
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Thanks,John. I see you've added a manicurist to your staff.
    Jim

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    I've had manicurists on staff for years, here at the Manor, as well as... other professionals. Life is good!

  13. #13
    Registered User mandolirius's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    victoria, canada
    Posts
    3,178

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Well, if it's supposed to be a scroll strengthener it didn't work.

  14. #14
    Registered Mando Hack dunwell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    313

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by sunburst View Post
    Sooo... do you really want to install one of those "strengtheners" in the peghead scroll? You've probably already guessed my opinion.
    That biscuit type doesn't do much. I do install an insert but I do a rectangle that extends a good bit more into the headstock area. I don't think that the type I install should fail in the way you see here. I also use maple for the insert so I don't think that would break. Hmmm, maybe what is needed there is just a bit of graphite bar epoxied in, that would be very strong but still be small.

    Alan D.

  15. #15

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Nice that the inlay was spared; if it were installed any farther in it would have cracked it.
    I stepped up on the platform, the man gave me the news;
    He said: "You must be joking son, where did you get those shoes...."

    "Your man doesn't sound so good!!"
    Miles Davis to his drummer (ignoring guitarist John Scofield, who he had just brought in for an audition)

    http://scottlearmonth.tripod.com

  16. #16
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Reston, VA
    Posts
    320

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Rather than coming up with new and ingenious ways to strengthen the scroll, why don't we just STOP BUILDING MANDOLINS WITH A HEADSTOCK SCROLL THAT EXISTS FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO EVENTUALLY BREAK OFF?
    PJ Doland
    1923 Gibson A (Snakehead)
    2012 Dudenbostel 1-A

  17. #17
    Registered User mandobassman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Delran, NJ
    Posts
    1,594

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by PJ Doland View Post
    Rather than coming up with new and ingenious ways to strengthen the scroll, why don't we just STOP BUILDING MANDOLINS WITH A HEADSTOCK SCROLL THAT EXISTS FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO EVENTUALLY BREAK OFF?
    Glad someone said it before me. That was exactly my thoughts.
    Larry Hunsberger

    2013 J Bovier A5 sunburst w/ToneGard
    D'Addario FW-74 flatwound strings
    Custom Wegen TF180 w/no bevel
    Weymann&Sons bowlback
    Ibanez PF5
    1993 Oriente HO-20 hybrid double bass
    Small body guitar converted to octave mandolin

  18. #18
    Registered User Pete Summers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    586

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by mandobassman View Post
    Glad someone said it before me. That was exactly my thoughts.
    And me, thinking the same thing. Not only is it a weak spot, personally I find the whole ostentatious F design to be awkward, ugly and unnecessary, but I know there are people who love them. Beats me why, though.

    Incidentally, just out of curiousity - I was wondering the reason for making repairs with hide glue? Wouldn't carpenter's glue that is impervious to moisture be a stronger bond for those type repairs which will not need to be disassembled in the future? Just wondering.

  19. #19
    Registered User Marc Berman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Red Hook, NY
    Posts
    314

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by PJ Doland View Post
    Rather than coming up with new and ingenious ways to strengthen the scroll, why don't we just STOP BUILDING MANDOLINS WITH A HEADSTOCK SCROLL THAT EXISTS FOR NO REASON OTHER THAN TO EVENTUALLY BREAK OFF?


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-29-11 Mark's F5 03.jpg 
Views:	98 
Size:	87.8 KB 
ID:	79634
    Marc B.

  20. #20
    Registered User Pete Summers's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2010
    Location
    Missouri
    Posts
    586

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by Marc Berman View Post


    Click image for larger version. 

Name:	4-29-11 Mark's F5 03.jpg 
Views:	98 
Size:	87.8 KB 
ID:	79634
    Much better.

  21. #21
    Ron McMillan blueron's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    near Chiang Mai, North Thailand
    Posts
    1,282

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    John's fascinating insight into the secrets of the repair world are always a pleasure to read.

    I share some of the posters' views on the impracticality of the scrolled headstock, but I have yet to see any alternative that comes even close to matching the design delight of the 'traditional' look.

  22. #22
    Registered User Dobe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    891

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    They should be detachable so you can go back & forth between 'Bill' & Or'ville' !

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    10,860

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    A few comments;

    I agree that the way to prevent scrolls breaking off of pegheads is to build pegheads without scrolls, but there is a place in the market (a strong place!) for scroll and point bearing mandolins, so broken scroll repairs do and will steadily show up in repair shops. We can't wish it away.

    I've repaired broken scrolls where the "strengthener" itself broke rather than coming out on one side like this one did. That is even harder to repair. (Wish I had pictures of that...)

    Ultimately, cross-grain wood, composite "biscuit" material, carbon fiber... it doesn't matter what you put in there, if you hit it hard enough it will fail... something will fail, either the scroll or a larger part of the peghead. As I see it, we can't prevent scroll breakage (other than the previously mentioned scroll-less peghead) so repairs to scrolls are going to be needed. Why not make the repair easier and not but some sort of inset thing in there to interfere with the repair?

    Hide glue is by far the best choice for the repair, IMO, because it will almost certainly have to be cleaned up and glued back on again when it gets broken off again. As you can see in the pictures, I was able to get the wood very clean for this repair, and that is because it was originally glued with hide glue and previously repaired with hide glue. The worst that could have happened would be that some well meaning, but uninformed, "repairman" had previously "repaired" it with epoxy, gorilla glue, superglue, or some such. Aliphatic would not have been as bad as those, but still would have presented more problem to clean up for a "proper" repair.

    My mandolin #6 should be coming back in sometime to have the scroll glued back on for the third time. There's no "strengthener" in there, so it will be pretty straight forward (again), and eventually it will probably collide with a guitar peghead on stage and get knocked off again. There's nothing I can do about that, but I can make it easier on myself when the time comes to glue it again.

  24. #24
    NY Naturalist BradKlein's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    854

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Well, I certainly won't enter into a debate about whose is the 'best' headstock. But I will say, 'nice columbine inlay' Marc. (it is columbine, right?)

    In defense of Gibson, the F-design is a masterpiece of its time and very very hard to improve upon aesthetically - but that headstock scroll is certainly an achilles heel.
    BradKlein
    Senior Producer, Twangbox Productions

  25. #25
    Registered User Marc Berman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Red Hook, NY
    Posts
    314

    Default Re: The case against scroll "strengtheners"

    Quote Originally Posted by BradKlein View Post
    Well, I certainly won't enter into a debate about whose is the 'best' headstock. But I will say, 'nice columbine inlay' Marc. (it is columbine, right?)

    In defense of Gibson, the F-design is a masterpiece of its time and very very hard to improve upon aesthetically - but that headstock scroll is certainly an achilles heel.
    Yes it is. It's Lawrence Smart's "Idaho mountains signature headstock" with a columbine flower.
    By the way I also like the look of the Gibson headstock and consider it a classic but when I ordered my Smart I wanted to go with his look.
    Marc B.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •