Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Rigel CT110

  1. #1
    Registered User Lane Pryce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Asheboro,NC
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    Last night I heard a a Gibson MM and a CT110 played side by side. The Rigel was eating him up! It was the first time I have seen the 110 in a bluegrass jam down here! Made me wish I still had my Breedlove. Anybody played a Rigel G5? I wonder if they sound as good as they look. Lp



    J.Lane Pryce

  2. #2
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Longmont
    Posts
    546

    Default

    Was it the player or the mando? Did they switch off? I have yet to hear a Rigel CT or G series in person. Someday...
    Mandofiddle

  3. #3
    Registered User Lane Pryce's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Asheboro,NC
    Posts
    1,986

    Default

    They traded off for one tune. The 110 was kicking butt. Both players were older and new their way around the fretboard pretty well. The funny thing about it was the sight of the older player sitting there with this funky looking axe! It was #7. Lp
    J.Lane Pryce

  4. #4
    Registered User Eric F.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Illinois
    Posts
    1,726

    Default

    I fell in love with a G-110 at First Quality a couple of years ago. Man, that thing could sing. And after a few minutes it just felt like it was part of me. Very, very nice instrument. Those high end Rigels are sweet.

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Tennessee (Still Missing North Carolina Though!)
    Posts
    1,708

    Default

    I would love to hear that! #A G-110 busting a Master Model....okay, what dream was that? #



    If F-model mandolins have F-holes then why don't A-model mandolins have A-holes???

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (JLP @ Sep. 08 2004, 10:41)
    Last night I heard a a Gibson MM and a CT110 played side by side. The Rigel was eating him up! It was the first time I have seen the 110 in a bluegrass jam down here!
    I own both a CT110 and Gibson MM. My perception is that the CT110 has a warm, complex sound that is ideal for many genres of music, like jazz or blues or swing, etc. And it certainly can be used for bluegrass (see Jimmy Gaudreau).

    However, the MM outshines the CT110 in bluegass in terms of woody tone and volume. The CT110 has a brighter sound, the MM darker. The MM certainly has much more of the "Loar" type sound, while the folks at Rigel didn't make that particular tone their priority when designing their CT110. And I can achieve a more satisfying "whoof" in the chop on the MM than I can on the CT110.

    But tone is always in the ear of the beholder. I'm sure both mandos sounded great in that jam, though to my ear the MM is the better blugrass instrument.

  7. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    North Carolina
    Posts
    8,786

    Default

    Sorry, but when I see the word 'complex' assigned to how a mandolin sounds, I just want to run and hide. Chemical structures are complex, higher math formulas are complex, people live in an apartment complex, but mandolin tone? Complex?

    To my ears, the more fundamental the sound description- strong, weak, full, tinny - the better.

  8. #8
    Mary Yanocsko Mandobar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    York, Maine
    Posts
    1,466

    Default

    the term "complex" is used frequently by guitar-lovers and builders to describe instruments which emit overtones, extremely "fat" trebles, etc. #

    i've heard several mandolin builders describe the sound of a red spruce topped mandolin as "fundamental" and an italian or german topped mando as "complex".



    so many mandolins, so little time.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Posts
    108

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (Mandobar @ Sep. 09 2004, 08:17)
    the term "complex" is used frequently by guitar-lovers and builders to describe instruments which emit overtones, extremely "fat" trebles, etc. #
    Perhaps I could have used "fat" (I often have when describing tone), but I'm not sure that would have conveyed the idea any better than "complex". #But Mandobar is right, that's the idea I was getting at.

    In the past I've used chili recipes as a metaphor for mandolin tone, maybe I should go back to that

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2002
    Posts
    166

    Default

    I recently got to play Ted's (aka Mandohack) CT110. #It is a great instrument. #I wouldn't consider it a bluegrass mandolin, but for everything else it would be wonderful. #I would agree with John in his comparison of the CT to the Master Model. #I own two Master Models. #I consider them both more up to the task of playing bluegrass than the CT, especially in regards to chop. #For that matter, I haven't heard another mandolin that chops like a Master Model (that is except for the Loars). #But in general, the CT would be a great all around mandolin. #

    P.S. That Mandohack blue is just beautiful. #Pictures just don't do it justice.

  11. #11
    Guest

    Default

    I agree . I used to sell these CT-110s. I consider them the best versatile all around mandolin. You can play just about any type of music on them and they do just fine.

    However hey are not my first choice for Bluegrass.

  12. #12
    Chief Moderator/Shepherd Ted Eschliman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,991
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Don't know about bluegrass, but "experts" claim the CT-110 REALLY rocks in Blue...
    Ted Eschliman
    Writer, Music Industry Consultant


    www.JazzMando.com
    Author, Getting Into Jazz Mandolin
    About Us
    Twitter: @FFcPmandolin

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Battle Creeek, NE 402-675-7009
    Posts
    361

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (JLP @ Sep. 08 2004, 09:41)
    Anybody played a Rigel G5? I wonder if they sound as good as they look.
    I can tell you, yes, the G5 sounds as good as it looks and is a bluegrass monster. I recently got to play one alongside the blue CT110 (i own an A Natural). They both rock, the G5 for BG, the CT for everything else.
    .
    .
    -= MAS is only life threatening if you're married =-
    .
    .
    =-= Zeek =-=
    BlueGrassFire

  14. #14
    Guest

    Default

    I've always loved Rigels & even though I just sold my personal CT110 I continue to be a fan. But....that scroll raises the ante $2850 retail above a CT110. I've never owned a G5 & probably never will.......

  15. #15
    Chief Moderator/Shepherd Ted Eschliman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Nebraska
    Posts
    3,991
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Dale, of course this is coming from a CT-110 fanatic (I even bought mine from Dale); even though I'd choose the CT over the G5, it's not fair to limit the difference to just the scroll...
    The G5 has a whole lot of other external "adornments," the neck binding, the fret inlays, the lap tail, and a ton of attention to the inside of the instrument you can't see, but most certainly hear.
    It's no exaggeration to say it barks like the rest of the dogs in its flagship price point. I've had both to show people, and the consensus reflects this thread to the tee.
    If you like to play bluegrass mostly, it's the G5 you want.
    If you just want a quality ax for a whole lot of other types of music, that CT is a monster, and an incredibly powerful tool.
    The G5 price is fair. I'd go so far to say as the CT is just more of a ridiculously good bargain.
    Ted Eschliman
    Writer, Music Industry Consultant


    www.JazzMando.com
    Author, Getting Into Jazz Mandolin
    About Us
    Twitter: @FFcPmandolin

  16. #16
    Guest

    Default

    Uh.....Ted, what's a lap tail?

    I just consulted a knowledgeable friend & he doesn't know either......must be some Nebraska slang we've never heard of. #




  17. #17
    Guest

    Default

    Ahhh......mystery solved! It's that point on the bottom of the treble side to keep the mando from sliding around when your sitting........ "lap tail"......a term from the "Loar" era, not to be confused with terms used in the "Dirty Dancing" era. #

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis,IN
    Posts
    274

    Default

    Hilarious Dale! Dirty Dancing era....

    I just wanted to say that I heard my first CT this past weekend and I thought it was great sounding and playing instrument. They also are very cool looking mandos too. It didn't quite have the chop that my Flatiron has, but then it did have excellent playability and a pretty darn good chop nonetheless. Great mandos they're making there in Vermont.
    42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

    # # # :::::::

    ---Ryan Stackhouse---

Similar Threads

  1. Rigel
    By Pete Braccio in forum Post a picture of your mandolin
    Replies: 20
    Last Post: Aug-25-2006, 1:03pm
  2. rigel Q95 vs A+0
    By John Rosett in forum Looking for information about mandolins
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: Mar-30-2006, 4:14pm
  3. Rigel F?
    By Boombloom in forum Looking for information about mandolins
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: Dec-04-2005, 5:57pm
  4. New Rigel
    By lhamilton1 in forum General Mandolin Discussions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: Nov-15-2004, 10:17am
  5. Rigel G5
    By A9cp in forum General Mandolin Discussions
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: May-13-2004, 10:21am

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •