Results 1 to 20 of 20

Thread: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

  1. #1
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,874

    Default Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    Which might be the better mandolin, a vintage Japanese made Kentucky KM-1000 or one of the new Chinese made ones? The vintage ones have been known to sell for more than the new ones.
    Jammin' south of the river
    '20 Gibson A-2
    Stromberg-Voisinet Tenor Guitar
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  2. #2

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I think the old ones sound alot better.

  3. #3
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,874

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    Well, I do know the "Sumi" Kentuckys are prized. I am sure they were built with different woods as well.
    Jammin' south of the river
    '20 Gibson A-2
    Stromberg-Voisinet Tenor Guitar
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    san diego
    Posts
    1,267

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    It really all depends. If you find a great sounding old one then it will cost more than a new one. However, if you find a new one that sounds great, then you have a cool KM1000 for a lot cheaper! Depending where you live, I would try as many new ones as possible till I found the one that sounded the best overall. The Vintage Km1000 mandolins are hard to come by and it would have to be a buy sight unseen kind of a deal I bet. Nick
    ntriesch

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Posts
    349

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I've got a new KM-1000. One of it's strong points is that it feels and plays great! I've offered it for sale before and truthfully, don't care if it sells or not. I love the side binding and the vintage look of the headstock overlay.
    Mine has a very open, big tone, particularly sweet on the high end. The chop needs to come around, and it will. Red Spruce is a bit slow in development, but every time I take this mando out, it gets better. I would say that my KM-1000 would be particularly well suited for Dawg type music as it sits right now. It "acts" more like a Monteleone than a Gibson.
    I haven't played many Sumi-era KM-1000s, but those that I have come across are great. I like the playability of my new one better, though, than the old ones that I've played.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    California
    Posts
    402

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I haven't played one of the old Kentuckys. I had a new one but had to sell because I was low on cash. I wished I hadn't! It was really a superb sounding instrument, very "Gibson-y" in tone and feel. Excellent fit and finish. With a couple of years of heavy playing, it would have sounded even better. I really thought it rivaled some $5-6000 range instruments like Duff, Hilburn that I have played.

    It's the one I let slip away that I regret!

  7. The following members say thank you to Bill Foss for this post:


  8. #7
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    6,007

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I have had a new KM-1000 for about a year and a half now. I let my brother borrow it for about 6 months and he returned it yesterday The red spruce top is now coming around and it has changed dramatically. They definately need a better bridge which mine has. It sounds better than the old ones to me
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  9. #8
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    6,470

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I've played both and to me the new ones are far superior to the old ones in fit,finish,quality and sound. At the time the old ones were hot they were equal or better than the ones XXXX made at the time. And today it's the same thing, they are as good or better then the ones XXXX are making now. And before you say you played a bad Kentucky , I've played some bad new XXXXs. But on the other hand I've played some super great XXXXs. If I was looking for a top end quality F5 style mandolin today under $5000 to be my no. 1 axe it would be the new KM1000. I'd probably get 4 of them and still be under $5000 !

  10. The following members say thank you to f5loar for this post:


  11. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Maryville, TN
    Posts
    349

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I mentioned my KM-1000 a few posts ago (Darryl, this is Roscoe, by the way...hi). I bought it thinking I might sell my 2000 F5-L and use the money for other purposes. I got cold feet about selling a really good Gibson and changed my mind. Here's the problem (hope it's the biggest one I ever have)... I can't sell the KM-1000 either. It shows signs of greatness everytime I play it, especially for a full set. I just have a feeling that the Kentucky is really going to be special as the Red Spruce comes into it's own. If I sell, it'll only be because I can't play two mandolins and give each the attention they require. I won't give up the Fern, but the KM-1000 has its own, equally attractive, personality. They're two different, great mandolins.

  12. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fernmando For This Useful Post:


  13. #10
    Old Guy Mike Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    755

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I have only been at this for about 18 months, and my 2008 KM 1000 was the first mandolin I bought. When purchased it compared closely to a Weber Yellowstone that the store had (the owner played both for me so I could compare. The Yellowstone was better but not $2K better) I have since acquired a Bulldog and an Eastman 504 (oval hole experiment). All three of these are distinctly different. I continue to A/B the KM 1000 and the Bulldog. I think they are pretty equal although really different. The Kentucky has better clarity on the lower strings, while the Bulldog is cleaner on the E string. I really don't need both, but can't decide which one to sell, so..............I keep them both for now. I have had a lot of compliments on both. I haven't played one of the older KM 1000s, but must say that the one I have is pretty darn good.
    Last edited by Mike Scott; Oct-07-2009 at 11:32am. Reason: typos
    Thanks

    Several mandolins of varying quality-any one of which deserves a better player than I am.......

  14. #11

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    i agree with F-5 Loar and Darryl,over the years i have had 4-5 Jap Km1000s and 3-4 Km-1500's
    never had one i thought was great,my daughter 8 yrs old has been learning on a F-9 ,she wanted something glossy, with a pickguard so i got one on approval ,i was floored by the tone ,volume and feel,they don't look ,sound or play Pac Rim,it s better than many mandolins i have had that cost 20 times more,very impressive,i find myself taking it out more and more.
    Danny Clark

  15. #12
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    6,470

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    The newer KM1000 is a mandolin good for the blindfold test. Blindfold a pro picker and hand it to him and ask him how much he thinks this mandolin would cost based on the feel and the sound. I bet he says $10,000 or more.
    And I'm not knocking the old Sumi ones (even if Sumi did or did not have anything to do with them) but many of those have had time to really be broken in for good sound today.
    Do the blindfold test on an old one and a new one and I'd bet the new one would win out everytime.

  16. The following members say thank you to f5loar for this post:


  17. #13
    Registered User Ken Olmstead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Anchorage, AK
    Posts
    2,020
    Blog Entries
    1

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I was impressed by both newer KM-1000s that I owned and subsequently sold. Why did I sell? My Weber Fern that I owned at the time was a better sounding instrument and I found myself ABing the two to the exclusion of just playing music. So I sold them. Sometimes it is tempting to cut all the BS and stop thinking a great mandolin has to be expensive, the KM-1000 proves that it does not. I did a comparison video (click on the youtube channel in my signature if your interested. Or search KM-1000 on the cafe, there is several good threads on them) between the Weber Fern and the KM-1000 and they sound very close. The Fern had a little more "meat" on the sound but it had been pounded heavily for 2.5 years and the KM-1000 was weeks old!
    http://www.youtube.com/user/tenorbanjoguy

    "Gettin' by" with the imports!

  18. The following members say thank you to Ken Olmstead for this post:


  19. #14
    Capt. E Capt. E's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    Austin, Texas
    Posts
    2,874

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    Thanks for the comments. Exactly what I was looking for.
    Jammin' south of the river
    '20 Gibson A-2
    Stromberg-Voisinet Tenor Guitar
    Penny Whistle
    My albums: http://www.mandolincafe.com/forum/album.php?u=7616

  20. #15

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I have owned numerous old 1000's and 1500's the new ones just dont have the deep woody tone like the old ones

  21. #16
    Old Guy Mike Scott's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    755

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    As a follow up to my earlier post, I had a lesson last night. I usually take the Bulldog to the lesson, but opted for the KM1000 last night. At the end of the lesson I asked my instructor (he plays a Collings MF5V) if my mandolin sounded OK. He said he thought it sounded great. While no match for the Collings, I did think it sounded pretty close-at least from my not to good of an ear. It seems the more I play it the better it sounds. So.................a little feedback on the newer KM1000 from an unbiased source.
    Thanks

    Several mandolins of varying quality-any one of which deserves a better player than I am.......

  22. #17
    Mando-Afflicted lflngpicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,244
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    Quote Originally Posted by f5loar View Post
    The newer KM1000 is a mandolin good for the blindfold test. Blindfold a pro picker and hand it to him and ask him how much he thinks this mandolin would cost based on the feel and the sound. I bet he says $10,000 or more.
    And I'm not knocking the old Sumi ones (even if Sumi did or did not have anything to do with them) but many of those have had time to really be broken in for good sound today.
    Do the blindfold test on an old one and a new one and I'd bet the new one would win out everytime.
    F5Loar, thanks for lending this opinion. As I await the arrival of my new KM-1000 -- it is getting a set up by the dealer before he ships it to me-- it is helpful to have your knowledgeable opinion posted so that I can be assured of the quality that I am buying in a Kentucky F style.
    2014 BRW F5 #114
    2022 Kentucky KM 950 Master Model

    YouTube Original Recording of My composition "Closer Walk"

  23. #18

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    From my experiences, the newer Kentucky's are the best yet. Maybe around 2007 on, they started improving the quality.
    Robert Fear
    http://www.folkmusician.com

    "Education is when you read the fine print; experience is what you get when you don't.
    " - Pete Seeger

  24. The following members say thank you to Folkmusician.com for this post:


  25. #19
    Registered User almeriastrings's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Almeria, Spain
    Posts
    5,448
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    I also feel the newer ones are excellent - and I would certainly not pay a premium for an older one. I don't really get the whole thing about the "Sumi Era", to be honest, in a present-day context. At the time, it was understandable.
    Gibson F5 'Harvey' Fern, Gibson F5 'Derrington' Fern
    Distressed Silverangel F 'Esmerelda' aka 'Maxx'
    Northfield Big Mon #127
    Ellis F5 Special #288
    '39 & '45 D-18's, 1950 D-28.

  26. The following members say thank you to almeriastrings for this post:


  27. #20
    Mando-Afflicted lflngpicker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    So Cal
    Posts
    2,244
    Blog Entries
    6

    Default Re: Kentucky KM-1000: vintage vs new

    Thanks Almeria and Robert for your valued input. It reinforces my decision to go with the KM-1000. I appreciate your posts! This was an interesting old thread.
    2014 BRW F5 #114
    2022 Kentucky KM 950 Master Model

    YouTube Original Recording of My composition "Closer Walk"

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •