Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: "the loar" mandolins... are these any good?

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    ocala
    Posts
    1

    Default

    Does anyone own, or has anyone played a "the Loar" mandolin? Is it as good as the name is carries? (well of course not) Are they worth the money?

    thanks,
    mike

  2. #2

    Default

    That question cant be really answered yet

    We are just now getting things going

    Lots to do but our target is nothing less than the level being seen by the Recording King banjo and the Carolina Guitars (without the burp on the first lot)

    Our target from a performance as well as marketing standpoint for mandolins andguitars this year is obviously in the Eastman range

    Steps are in the works now to do this but just getting started

    Scott

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    TN
    Posts
    71

    Default

    I look forward to getting my hands on one, will you let us know when they become available?

    Thanks

    S

  4. #4
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    burnaby, bc, canada
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Nothing to do with the mandolins, but the latest edition of
    Acoustic Guitar magazine reviewed the new The Loar archtop guitar modeled after a Gibson L5, and really liked it.



    awm

  5. #5
    Registered User RichM's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    567

    Default

    I love Acoustic Guitar magazine, but I have never seen anything but a rave review in its pages. That's not to suggest that The Loar archtop isn't a good guitar, just that I'd want to play one myself.

  6. #6
    Registered User trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    brighton UK
    Posts
    1,800

    Default

    More info please. I haven't heard anything about 'The Loar' mandolins.
    Trevor
    Formerly of The Acoustic Music Co (TAMCO) Brighton England now retired.

  7. #7
    Moderator JEStanek's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Pottstown, Pennsylvania, United States
    Posts
    14,284
    Blog Entries
    2

    Default

    Info from their Web page.
    Greg Rich is with the project. Looks like the MSRP$799.00 USD one is not hand carved but the custom $5K one (Sumi) is hand carved.

    Jamie
    There are two things to aim at in life: first, to get what you want; and, after that, to enjoy it. Only the wisest of mankind achieve the second. Logan Pearsall Smith, 1865 - 1946

    + Give Blood, Save a Life +

  8. #8
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Barren Springs, Virginia
    Posts
    5

    Default

    I took a chance on The Loar. I sent a deposit last Friday on mine. According to the place where I put my order in, it will be around the middle of Febuary before they can be shipped. I am no mandolin player but I have always wanted a nice mandolin at a affordable price. One reason I took a chance is I took a chance on the Carolina Series II JD26 guitar and was very pleased with it. The serial number is below 50 and was in the first batch to be sold. Yes it does have a small hump in the top but it's not getting any higher and man its a boomer. For that reason I can live with the small hump. The only thing I was dis-satisified with is the pickguard is coming detached. I wrote the Music Link last week and explained this problem and let them know the dealer I purchased it from is no longer a Johnson Dealer and requested a replacement pickguard. They would not replace the pickguard but Ali told me to contact the ex dealer I bought from and complain. Our band plays a lot of gigs in VA so I decided I would just play it like it is with the edges curled up and tell folks about the Music Link's response. And when it falls off I'll spend the 10 bucks and install a new one. I sure hope the Loar mandolin is as good as the JD 26. If not, I'll return it.

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    burnaby, bc, canada
    Posts
    409

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (RichM @ Jan. 08 2007, 07:48)
    I love Acoustic Guitar magazine, but I have never seen anything but a rave review in its pages. That's not to suggest that The Loar archtop isn't a good guitar, just that I'd want to play one myself.
    The magazine's response to that criticism of their critiques is that if the instruments they receive are turkeys, they won't review them.



    awm

  10. #10
    Registered User red7flag's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Dickson, TN
    Posts
    3,292

    Default

    They won't review turkey's. That defies logic. How would we know what is a turkey? Sounds like they are in the makers pocket and want to keep it that way.
    Tony
    Tony Huber
    1930 Martin Style C #14783
    2011 Mowry GOM
    2013 Hester F4 #31
    2014 Ellis F5 #322
    2017 Nyberg Mandola #172

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,958

    Default

    Sad but True: Acoustic Guitar Magazine product reviews defy logic. Somehow *everything* is good!

    I'm a bit wary of The Loar, after learning that the L-5's were originally produced with laminate back and sides. I've since read posts from Greg Rich over at the UMGF claiming that specs will soon change to solid wood.

    It troubles me that thier operation was comfortable putting out an L-5 replica named The Loar while using laminate construction (Frills AND Plywood). The way I see it, this company is OK cutting corners, and the brand name itself (The Loar) is pretty meaningless after that move.

    Time will tell.

  12. #12
    Registered User MandoSquirrel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Location
    southwest florida
    Posts
    1,683

    Default

    Some of the quality vintage instruments were made with laminates, it's a question of how they do it. Plywood just won't do. That said, other than under $500 bargain vintage instruments, such as really old Kay's & Stradolins, I tend to rule out any instrument as soon as I read the word "laminate"
    Elrod
    Gibson A2 1920(?)
    Breedlove Cascade
    Washburn 215(?) 1906-07(?)
    Victoria, B&J, New York(stolen 10/18/2011)
    Eastwood Airline Mandola

    guitars:
    Guild D-25NT
    Vega 200 archtop, 1957?

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Cincinnati, OH
    Posts
    1,958

    Default

    I once had a chance to play a "The Loar" mandolin built by Bruce Weber. I believe that short run was a commision from Greg Rich. Really nice sounding mandolin, but I thought it sounded like a Weber Fern and not so much like Gibson.

    And while it sounds nothing at all like an L-5 ... I sure do love my plywood Kay!




  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    1,616

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by
    Quote (RichM @ Jan. 08 2007, 07:48)

    I love Acoustic Guitar magazine, but I have never seen anything but a rave review in its pages. That's not to suggest that The Loar archtop isn't a good guitar, just that I'd want to play one myself.

    The magazine's response to that criticism of their critiques is that if the instruments they receive are turkeys, they won't review them.
    That wasn't always the case; I was looking through some stacks of back issues from mid-late 90s, and something that stood out is that the instrument reviews (eg, "10 new dreadnoughts") were definitely more mixed and reserved, if not really negative. #

    There are lots of quality instruments, if not truly top-of-the-line models, made with solid tops and laminated backs and/or sides, from Guilds to Martins. #It's simply an approach to meet a intermediate price-point, I think.

    I also read the Loar L5 guitar review in AG; that guitar was described as having a pressed solid spruce top and laminated back/sides. #Its description seemed not to be a "replica" of the L5, so much as an affordable archtop paying tribute to the design. #As in, "embodying the spirit of vintage mandolins from the Golden Age", as they describe their F-model mandolin.

    The archtop model guitars on the Loar website now ARE presented as "accurate replicas". #Seems like the direction they're going is better than the opposite direction, though, huh? #For myself, I'd rather have a well-made affordable semi-replica available to me, than a $10K Anderson (or whatever) that I could never consider buying.
    Jeff Rohrbough
    "Listen louder, play softer"

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Location
    Pacifica Ca
    Posts
    12

    Default

    Let me bring you up to date on the Loar mandolins -
    Released at the upcoming NAMM show will be the LM-500-VS, an F-style mandolin. It is an all solid instrument retailing for $799. It is a production mandolin built to our specifications and I consider it a very nice intermediate model mandolin.
    It is not going to compete against a hand varnished import instrument. If you are looking for a hand carved Loar style, however, we do offer a handmade Sumi model handbuilt in Japan. Contact customshop@themusiclink.net for pricing and more info.
    In the very near future you are going to see some really nice hand carved and varnished mandolins and guitars under the Loar name at the same quality level as the Recording King banjos. I can;t give you more details now, but as it develops I will keep you guys posted.
    Travis, our product manager, will keep me up to date on our product development and I will let you know as I find out.
    Greg Rich

  16. #16
    Registered User steve V. johnson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Bloomington, Indiana
    Posts
    3,863

    Default

    Ahhh... reviews...

    I read a lot of product reviews and I think I've learned to find out for myself what information is in them (and -if- any information is in them! <GG&gt, so if the thing is a 'puff piece' it doesn't much matter, all that matters is if I find some useful information. #Geez, folks, this is America in the 21st century... EVERYTHING in magazines is -marketing-. #Some rags do it better, some worse.

    I read the AG review of the Loar guitar and I found the article useful. #I learned more than I had from previous ads and rumors, so I'm fine with that. #And, I've had '40's and '50's archtop guitars (from various makers) that were made of laminates and they were both exciting and satisfying instruments. #I'll grant that in today's market the term (and substance), "laminate" is a bit of a buzzword and elicits prejudices and shoppers' wariness. #But as been said here in the forums before, there are laminates and laminates, and some do things very handsomely.

    One point that I thought that the AG article brought up was that there are very few alternatives out there for an affordable archtop guitar, so this is a really nice (IMO) addition to the marketplace. #I saw a picture of a Loar guitar with a round or oval hole on top.... I don't think that there are -any- other archtops being made like that!

    I'm not in the mkt for a guitar of that sort, but I like the way they look a lot. #Kudos for keeping them simple, and not all tarted up. #I -am- eager to play and hear some of 'em.

    Eastman's success is a pretty good target to aspire to for a new mandolin maker/marketer. #I'll be more attentive when you have some A-models in the product stream. <G>
    Thanks to Scott and Greg for responding to this thread, and good luck!

    stv



    steve V. johnson

    Culchies
    http://cdbaby.com/Culchies
    The Lopers
    Ghosts Like Me
    http://cdbaby.com/Lopers1
    There Was A Time
    http://cdbaby.com/Lopers2

  17. #17
    Café habitué Paul Hostetter's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Santa Cruz, California
    Posts
    6,286

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by
    (RichM @ Jan. 08 2007, 07:48)
    I love Acoustic Guitar magazine, but I have never seen anything but a rave review in its pages. That's not to suggest that The Loar archtop isn't a good guitar, just that I'd want to play one myself.

    The magazine's response to that criticism of their critiques is that if the instruments they receive are turkeys, they won't review them.
    It's no big secret that their advertisers often submit products for review, so journalistic integrity predictably takes a back seat to fiscal concerns. Guitar Player was a testament to this when their entire founding staff walked when a less-then-effusive review was yanked by the publishers. Sad, and I don't condone it, but it's the way it is.
    .
    ph

    º º º º º º º º º º º º º º º
    Paul Hostetter, luthier
    Santa Cruz, California
    www.lutherie.net

  18. #18

    Default

    I used to work for Easyrider Magazine and the way a special product magazine makes it money to operate is with ads, and the way it pays that back is friendly press press.Newsstand sales and subs is the profit area.

    I also love Acoustic Guitar for the stories.

Similar Threads

  1. "the Loar"  mandolins
    By Nick Triesch in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 19
    Last: Oct-08-2008, 1:40pm
  2. Good price on howard frye's "gypsy mandolin!"
    By Jim MacDaniel in forum Jazz/Blues Variants, Bossa, Choro, Klezmer
    Replies: 27
    Last: Sep-29-2007, 2:43pm
  3. Young Rascals "Good Lovin" Solo
    By jstrain in forum Rock, Folk Rock, Roots Rock, Rockabilly
    Replies: 0
    Last: Sep-25-2006, 9:02pm
  4. Marshall's Loar on "Gator Strut"
    By Fretbear in forum Looking for Information About Mandolins
    Replies: 0
    Last: Jul-18-2006, 11:36am
  5. Ebay Item "case for A5 Loar"
    By Chip Booth in forum General Mandolin Discussions
    Replies: 5
    Last: Dec-15-2004, 8:34am

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •