Page 40 of 89 FirstFirst ... 1536373839404142434465 ... LastLast
Results 976 to 1,000 of 2222

Thread: Loar Picture of the Day

  1. #976
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    5,502

    Default

    Spoken as only the owner of a Fern Loar could say
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  2. #977
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    seattle
    Posts
    41

    Default

    f5loar & f5journal,
    I am glad you cleared all of this up for me. #I still get confused when people discuss Loars, Ferns, unsigned, signed, f5's etc.

    Thanks
    Jack Schultz

  3. #978
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Thousand Oaks, CA
    Posts
    385

    Default

    I wish some of you Loar owners would participate in the Mandolin Project. I would love to hear the sound of some of these instruments to go along with the nice pictures.

  4. #979
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    503

    Default

    Aren't the "unsigned" Loars more rare that the Fern Loars?
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  5. #980
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    seattle washington
    Posts
    298

    Default

    I've heard there's 13 of them. Don't know if that's true or not. I also heard they're all pretty good sounding instruments, even compared with their signed brothers.

  6. #981
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    5,502

    Default

    I have 18 Fern Loars and 7 "unsigned Loars" accounted for. #There are numerous "in between numbers" that would put the unsigned potential mandolins in the range of about 18-20. #The main key to the unsigned Loars is the Factory Order Number. #They possess the 11985 and 11896 FON's. #December 1, 1924 signed Loars are FON 11985, and obviously 11896 FON mandolins were built before December 1 1924. #The true Ferns that display post Loars attributes begin with FON 8231, a whole new FON system.



    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  7. #982
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    cornelia ga
    Posts
    10

    Default

    Actually, the unsigned 81290 F-5 is incorrectly listed as having the factory batch number 11986. I owned that mandolin for a couple of years and it was stamped 11985 also. It must have been misread early and has assumed to be ever since then. I have owned 3 of of the known unsigned Loars and have found them to be completely equal to all of the signed ones that I have had.
    mitch simpson

  8. #983
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    435

    Default

    You're right, Mitch...

    It's 11985. And they are all equal in every respect except one....... that signature label.

    Charlie

  9. #984
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    5,502

    Default

    I corrected that...so I guess this means that the unsigned are all presumably FON 11985
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  10. #985
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    5,400

    Default

    It's not the meat you use but the sauce.

  11. #986
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    503

    Default

    unsigned 82369 has a FON of 11985
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  12. #987
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    5,502

    Default

    Thanks Brian. #This is an excellent example of unsigned mandos. #82369 is a flowerpot with the "unsigned Loar" FON/stamp number and 82348 and 82427 are both Ferns with stamp 8231
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  13. #988
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    503

    Default

    82427 was my first old F5. What a nice mandolin it is. A totally different animal than 82369 though.
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  14. #989
    Formerly F5JOURNL Darryl Wolfe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    aiken, sc
    Posts
    5,502

    Default

    The entire situation above proves that serial numbers are assigned late in the construction process,....and that batches can get mixed up in their relative stage of completion prior to assigning the serial number. Hence, "unsigned Loars" and occasionally a "28 serial number that looks, feels and sounds like a '25
    Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
    www.f5journal.com

  15. #990
    Cafe Linux Mommy danb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1996
    Location
    Norfolk, England
    Posts
    5,569

    Default

    Here's #73682, June 1923. No day on the signature label. Very nice instrument, the first with the July 9 batch features.

    The Mandolin Archive
    my CDs
    "The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead"

  16. #991
    Cafe Linux Mommy danb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 1996
    Location
    Norfolk, England
    Posts
    5,569

    Default

    Back..

    The Mandolin Archive
    my CDs
    "The wheel is turning, but the hamster is dead"

  17. #992
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Indianapolis,IN
    Posts
    274

    Default

    I just looked at those pics at the Archives and that is one pretty mandolin! Beautiful specimen...
    42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

    # # # :::::::

    ---Ryan Stackhouse---

  18. #993
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Inland Empire, CA
    Posts
    84

    Default

    What are the features of this group other than the triple side binding?

    Thanks

  19. #994
    Registered User f5loar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Salisbury,NC
    Posts
    5,400

    Default

    Fantastic, mind blowing,bone crushing,mastertone bashing, incrediable sound with power. As Big Mon said of this batch "She's never let me down"

  20. #995
    Registered User Yellowmandolin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    523

    Default

    I know this is an ignornant question, but what is the deal with Virzi labled mandolins? Whatever they are, are they still used today?
    Play, play, play!

    Jacob Hawkins

  21. #996
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    503
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  22. #997
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    N. Central, TX
    Posts
    145

    Default

    1,000th. post of this thread




  23. #998
    Registered User Yellowmandolin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Columbus, OH
    Posts
    523

    Default

    Thanks, Brian.
    Play, play, play!

    Jacob Hawkins

  24. #999
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    SW Ohio
    Posts
    503

    Default

    you're welcomed yellowmandolin. As to your Q are they still used today; There are two builders that I know of that offer them as options. They are Lynn Dudenbostel and Randy Wood. I am sure there are others that I am not aware of.
    A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.

  25. #1000
    Registered User evanreilly's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Asheville, North Carolina
    Posts
    4,293

    Default

    Rigel and Doug Woodley have offered the Virzi as an option.
    Here is the Doug Woodley monster Virzi:
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	woodley_virzi.jpg 
Views:	28 
Size:	57.8 KB 
ID:	3998  

Similar Threads

  1. Loar Picture of the Day
    By Darryl Wolfe in forum Vintage Instruments
    Replies: 989
    Last Post: Apr-20-2013, 7:16pm
  2. Post a picture opost a picture of your fake gibson
    By f5loar in forum Post a picture of your mandolin
    Replies: 151
    Last Post: Sep-21-2011, 3:48pm
  3. Post a picture opost a picture of your fake gibson
    By dirty harry in forum Post a picture of your mandolin
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: Dec-24-2007, 7:45am
  4. Post your picture of the loar a5
    By fatt-dad in forum Vintage Instruments
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: Jul-17-2007, 9:45pm
  5. Loar Picture of the Day
    By Darryl Wolfe in forum Post a picture of your mandolin
    Replies: 1840
    Last Post: Mar-02-2006, 10:08pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •