Spoken as only the owner of a Fern Loar could say![]()
Spoken as only the owner of a Fern Loar could say![]()
Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
www.f5journal.com
f5loar & f5journal,
I am glad you cleared all of this up for me. #I still get confused when people discuss Loars, Ferns, unsigned, signed, f5's etc.
Thanks![]()
Jack Schultz
I wish some of you Loar owners would participate in the Mandolin Project. I would love to hear the sound of some of these instruments to go along with the nice pictures.
Aren't the "unsigned" Loars more rare that the Fern Loars?
A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.
I've heard there's 13 of them. Don't know if that's true or not. I also heard they're all pretty good sounding instruments, even compared with their signed brothers.
I have 18 Fern Loars and 7 "unsigned Loars" accounted for. #There are numerous "in between numbers" that would put the unsigned potential mandolins in the range of about 18-20. #The main key to the unsigned Loars is the Factory Order Number. #They possess the 11985 and 11896 FON's. #December 1, 1924 signed Loars are FON 11985, and obviously 11896 FON mandolins were built before December 1 1924. #The true Ferns that display post Loars attributes begin with FON 8231, a whole new FON system.
Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
www.f5journal.com
Actually, the unsigned 81290 F-5 is incorrectly listed as having the factory batch number 11986. I owned that mandolin for a couple of years and it was stamped 11985 also. It must have been misread early and has assumed to be ever since then. I have owned 3 of of the known unsigned Loars and have found them to be completely equal to all of the signed ones that I have had.
mitch simpson
You're right, Mitch...
It's 11985. And they are all equal in every respect except one....... that signature label.
Charlie
I corrected that...so I guess this means that the unsigned are all presumably FON 11985
Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
www.f5journal.com
It's not the meat you use but the sauce.
unsigned 82369 has a FON of 11985
A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.
Thanks Brian. #This is an excellent example of unsigned mandos. #82369 is a flowerpot with the "unsigned Loar" FON/stamp number and 82348 and 82427 are both Ferns with stamp 8231
Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
www.f5journal.com
82427 was my first old F5. What a nice mandolin it is. A totally different animal than 82369 though.
A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.
The entire situation above proves that serial numbers are assigned late in the construction process,....and that batches can get mixed up in their relative stage of completion prior to assigning the serial number. Hence, "unsigned Loars" and occasionally a "28 serial number that looks, feels and sounds like a '25
Darryl G. Wolfe, The F5 Journal
www.f5journal.com
Here's #73682, June 1923. No day on the signature label. Very nice instrument, the first with the July 9 batch features.
![]()
Back..
![]()
I just looked at those pics at the Archives and that is one pretty mandolin! Beautiful specimen...![]()
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
# # # :::::::
---Ryan Stackhouse---
What are the features of this group other than the triple side binding?
Thanks
Fantastic, mind blowing,bone crushing,mastertone bashing, incrediable sound with power. As Big Mon said of this batch "She's never let me down"
I know this is an ignornant question, but what is the deal with Virzi labled mandolins? Whatever they are, are they still used today?![]()
Play, play, play!
Jacob Hawkins
scroll down to virzi
# http://www.mandolincafe.com/archives/faq.html
A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.
1,000th. post of this thread
Thanks, Brian.
Play, play, play!
Jacob Hawkins
you're welcomed yellowmandolin. As to your Q are they still used today; There are two builders that I know of that offer them as options. They are Lynn Dudenbostel and Randy Wood. I am sure there are others that I am not aware of.
A wrong note played timidly is a wrong note. A wrong note played with authority is an interpretation.
Rigel and Doug Woodley have offered the Virzi as an option.
Here is the Doug Woodley monster Virzi:
Bookmarks