Results 1 to 23 of 23

Thread: GHS Strings

  1. #1
    Registered User Don Grieser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pine Hill, New Mexico
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    I tried a set of GHS A-270 mando strings. They use a 16 for the A string--all the other strings match the J74 set I've been using since day one. I just like that heavier A string, and the other strings seem to give pretty much the same kind of tone as the J74s. They cost alittle more than the J74s, but not if you're throwing out the 15 A and replacing it with a 16.

    Anybody had any trouble with GHS strings? Anybody else use them?

    Don
    Original Melodies for Mandolin, Mandola & Mandocello
    http://www.HillbillyChamberMusic.com

  2. #2
    Registered User jim simpson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Wheeling, WV
    Posts
    3,507

    Default

    Don,
    I am curious about the GHS strings as well. It seems that they are supposed to be less prone to breakage. Could this be true? I have used the J74's forever and didn't think I would change. Has anyone turned in those "player points" for stuff? I think I have enough for a stool and some shirts.
    Jim
    Cabin Fever String Band, National Pike Pickers

  3. #3
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Grass Valley California
    Posts
    3,214

    Default

    I have used GHS strings for many years. Back in the '80s there was an article in FRETS magazine comparing strings of all sorts, and one point that I thought interesting was that the GHS A260 set (.011, .016, .024, .038, endorsed by Bobby Osborne)has less than 2 lbs. difference in tension between strings. This should give more even response if the instrument is evenly made. GHS makes good strings, as do most all of the current manufacturers.

  4. #4
    Registered User Don Grieser's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pine Hill, New Mexico
    Posts
    1,558

    Default

    I've turned in the players points. Be ready to pay shipping for your "freebies."

    I just ordered a dozen sets of GHS so I'm ready to give them the big try-out.

    I've never had trouble with strings breaking except with some DR mando strings.
    Original Melodies for Mandolin, Mandola & Mandocello
    http://www.HillbillyChamberMusic.com

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Denver, CO
    Posts
    375

    Default

    I prefer GHS over D'addario any day. I never heard that about less prone to breakage, but now that I think about it, there's no doubt in my mind that the GHS break much less frequently than the D'A, in my experience.

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Michigan
    Posts
    141

    Default

    I've been using GHS strings since 1989 and have not broken
    a string since then. But now I must admit that I have been
    experimenting with D'Addario EXP74, Thomastik-Infelds, and
    am going to give the Elixir's a try. Just need a change to
    see if there is anything better than what I've been using.
    ManjoMan

  7. #7
    Registered User Ken's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    In Illinois, halfway between here and there.
    Posts
    418

    Default

    Here is another endorsement for GHS, been using them (mostly A260's) since the early 80's. Can't say I've ever seriously compared them to anything else, never felt the need to.

    Ken.
    Peace

  8. #8
    Registered User mandowilli's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Taos, NM
    Posts
    304

    Default

    I use the A250's on both of my old A gibsons as recomended in previous threads to lighten the load, and also also the PF280 mandola strings and the PF285 octave set to much satisfaction.
    The J74 EXP are the way to go on an F-5 though, hands down.

    willi
    willi

    Mesa

  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Posts
    136

    Default

    I put a set of GHS Bronze and Silk strings on my A9 last week, so far I like them a bunch. Really brings out the woody sound of the mandolin.

    Lee

  10. #10
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Concord, North Carolina
    Posts
    8

    Default

    I am a BIG fan of the GHS Silk & Bronze strings (GHS_LSB250). It seems like I've tried everything...but I always come back to these. I'll keep trying new strings as they are developed, but somebody's going to have to go a ways to beat these, IMHO.

  11. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Posts
    141

    Default

    Don,

    #I use the 270s (bright or PB) on my main axe exclusively. #I think they're great strings.

    Jeff

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Richmond, Va.
    Posts
    81

    Default

    i have used the GHS 270's (BB. & PB) for a long time. I found the tone to be good with the BB, and excellent with the PB. They also gave me more volume than J74,s. Right now I'm using TI's on my F5 and and I really like them. I'm still using ghs on my Amodel and on my Mandola.
    Jeff W
    Jeffrey S Wagner

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    music city usa
    Posts
    5

    Default

    the ghs silk and bronze are my faves, hands down.
    love the tone and the feel.

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Charles Town, WV
    Posts
    345

    Default

    Resurrecting this post because I just strung a mando up with GHS Phosphor Bronzes, because in a pinch I needed strings for a gig and this is all the local store stocked (way marked up, of course).

    Anyway, I found them to be considerably to bright for my tastes, but I'm always trying new strings and don't want to give up yet on the GHS'.

    They have a "brightness chart" on the pack that states their Silk + Bronze are less bright, and their Silk + Steel are even less bright (I think that's how it goes anyway).

    Is this true?

    Do the Silk+Bronze have comparable volume to the Phosphor Bronze?

  15. #15
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    conner mt
    Posts
    163

    Default

    i also have used ghs a-270 for years..they have the clearest, punchiest tone of any,,and i have tried virtually every string available on the many mandos i have owned- i didn't like them the best on my givens f-5...but i loved them on my monteleone m-5, monteleone f-5, monteleone grand artist, stiver a, cole f-5, gibson f-5, #collings mf-5, ziedler, gibson a-40, schofield f-5 # if they quit making them , i would be bigtime depressed
    mike conroy--
    1980 Monteleone m-5 (#46)
    Collings mf-5 (#88)

  16. #16

    Default

    ..dayam..youve got quite a stable of mandos there Mike..but for me nothing but Gibson Monels/Bush set...

  17. #17
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2003
    Location
    Terra Ceia, NC
    Posts
    939

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (mike_c @ April 28 2004, 16:58)
    ...but i loved them on my monteleone m-5, monteleone f-5, monteleone grand artist, stiver a, cole f-5, gibson f-5, #collings mf-5, ziedler, gibson a-40, schofield f-5 # if they quit making them , i would be bigtime depressed
    you mean depressed if they quit making strings or quit making mandolins? #Like Scotti said "that's quite a stable..."
    Alan

  18. #18
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    234

    Default

    when i had a pair of GHS strings on my mando, i was not impressed. they got a little bit better after i broke them in, but i dont think ill buy them again.
    "A mando is a terrible thing to waste."

  19. #19
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Indianapolis IN
    Posts
    169

    Default

    I like the J74's better than the A270's but believe it or not I like the D'Aquisto mediums better than both. I had bought a mandolin from Greg Boyds and he threw in a free pack, that is the only reason I tried them and I love em, they are only $3 a pack at first quality, don't know why they are not that popular.
    Dave

  20. #20
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    172

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by (wannabethile @ April 28 2004, 20:11)
    when i had a pair of GHS strings on my mando, i was not impressed. #they got a little bit better after i broke them in, but i dont think ill buy them again.
    ditto.

    (hi Robert)
    "wait until someday, 'cause when I know what to say, I'll say it in the best way you've ever heard..." ~nickel creek

  21. #21
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Panama Cit
    Posts
    1,346

    Default

    I used to use them. I DID have string breakage problems but that could have been the way I played or something. What I don't like is that when I don't change them they consistantly put slivers of steel in my freting fingers OUCH. This is a bad problem for me. I liked the tone posibilities but the sliver thing is imposible to overcome. ...Must be something in the formulation of steel or brass that doesn't agree with my hands. I don't have "corrosive hands" and I wipe my strings down. I use J74's FT74, and bill monroes. I'm gonna switch to the monroes soon as I run out of this 10pack of 74s. Ghs?? like em but can't stand em.

  22. #22
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Nashville, TN
    Posts
    234

    Default

    hey there, hannah::
    "A mando is a terrible thing to waste."

  23. #23
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jan 2003
    Location
    Baton Rouge
    Posts
    678

    Default

    Has anyone tried the D'Addario JS74's-stainless steel?
    Keep it acoustic.

Similar Threads

  1. Strings
    By bottrane in forum Equipment
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: Oct-03-2007, 6:56pm
  2. J73 Strings
    By DryBones in forum Equipment
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: Jul-26-2006, 2:38pm
  3. Monel wound strings...Black strings....
    By levin4now in forum Equipment
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: Apr-10-2005, 1:10pm
  4. Anyone Tried These New Strings?
    By Onesound in forum Equipment
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: Apr-08-2005, 11:50am
  5. strings for a mid-mo
    By jus in forum Equipment
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: Aug-15-2004, 9:56pm

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •