Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: M-22V & M-4C

  1. #1

    Default

    Here's a few pix of Doug's M22V...
    The 22V has a 14 fret neck, and elevated fingerboard extension.



    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D_s_ft.jpg 
Views:	15 
Size:	70.3 KB 
ID:	9788  

  2. #2

    Default

    Back...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	D_sbk.jpg 
Views:	23 
Size:	77.9 KB 
ID:	9789  

  3. #3

    Default

    And the M-4C classic...
    The 4C has the 12 fret neck and fingerboard glued to the top.



    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F_4ft.jpg 
Views:	25 
Size:	68.8 KB 
ID:	9790  

  4. #4

    Default

    Back...
    Attached Thumbnails Attached Thumbnails Click image for larger version. 

Name:	F_4bk.jpg 
Views:	18 
Size:	71.0 KB 
ID:	9791  

  5. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    , Vermont
    Posts
    297

    Default

    Hans, great photos of my soon to be M22V!! It is gorgeous. The scroll is fantastic. The sound will be superb. It will be well worth the wait. I am excited. Doug

  6. #6
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    New York, NY
    Posts
    101

    Default

    Perfect as always. I love watching hard work pay off.
    myspace.com/jeremyain

  7. #7
    Registered User Steve Davis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Wolfeboro, NH #03894
    Posts
    774

    Default

    Beautiful work as always Hans. Someday I hope to own one of your superb mandolins. Is there any difference in sound between the two models, or is the difference mainly one of playability?
    Steve Davis

    I should really be practicing instead of sitting in front of the computer.

  8. #8

    Default

    Steve, the M22 seems to be a stronger instrument. When I compare it to my '21 F-4, the tone is very similar (excluding the fact that the Gibson is 90 yrs old), but more powerful, and a little sweeter (Italian spruce). My suspicion is that the M4C is a little less powerful than the M22, but I have only played it in the "white", so it's hard to say. We'll find out in a couple of weeks.




  9. #9
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Woodstock, CT
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Hans, What is the M-4C??? Classic version of the M22? I would have thought the 12 fret would have more bass but the elevated fingerboard must help the top vibrate more freely? Are they both braced with the single transverse?
    Dave H




  10. #10

    Default

    Dave, the Model 4 Classic is an F-4 mandolin. We should be able to tell the difference between the two mandolins in a very short time. I just buffed the M-4 out today. It'll take a few days to harden up a bit, then I'll string it up. Since Doug's M22V is essentially brand new, it'll be a good comparison. Both instruments have the single transverse brace and use the same tonewood.The neck on the 22 is maple, and the neck on the 4C is mahogany. Both have a truss rod.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Warwick, NY
    Posts
    3,374

    Default

    That's the rossette that should be on f-4s. Love them.

  12. #12
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Yarmouth, Maine
    Posts
    30

    Default

    So what happened? Inquiring minds....

  13. #13
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    , Vermont
    Posts
    297

    Default

    At week two,with daily playing, the M22V is great. Fun to play and a nice fit in the hands. Doug

  14. #14
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Woodstock, CT
    Posts
    18

    Default

    Hans, how do they compare tonally now that the M4C is finished? Dave H

  15. #15

    Default

    Dave & Ed,
    The 22V is a stronger instrument (not louder), the trebles a bit more crisp, maybe you could say more focused. The 4C has a little more refined tone, the term delicate comes to mind (again has nothing to do with loudness). Another way to describe it might be to talk about attack and decay. The 22 seems to have a slightly quicker attack and faster decay. You might say it's faster off the pick. I would attribute the difference in tone is due mostly to the bridge placement, although some difference might be because of the neck materials used...maple vs mahogany.




Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •