Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

  1. #1
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Oak Park, IL
    Posts
    291

    Default New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Hey folks, I just joined, this is my first post. I started learning mandolin about 9 months ago--picked it up as a secondary instrument to my Martin OM-21, thought I'd just monkey around on it for a few minutes every once in a while....but it has taken over my life. Now I only use the Martin for old-time country blues fingerpicking--any time I feel bluegrassy or Django-y or anything else that I would do with a pick, I reach for the mando, and it's the guitar that I only visit every once in a while.

    Anyhoo, my mando is an Eastman 305. I chose it over the Kentuckys in the same price range because it had a woodier tone. The only downside I have found is that it's hard to get a full sound out of the E string, especially as I go up the neck. I figure it's partly due to the instrument and party due to my as-yet undeveloped technique. Last week when I was in the music store where I have bought all my instruments (Different Strummer, here in Chicago at the Old Town School of Folk Music) I tried out an Eastman 515. Wow! It was smoother, easier to play all over, and I had no problem at all getting the volume and sound I wanted out of the E string. In fact it was louder and clearer, period. So I bought it.

    Then I took it home....and yes, it was more playable and louder than the 305, and had a nice sweet tone to it. But the 305 was still woodier, more "hollow" sounding, in short more Monroe-sounding. I had promised my wife I would sell the 305 to help finance the 515, but I just couldn't bring myself to do it. The tone of the 305 just had more character than the 515, which head-to-head now sounded bright and clear but a bit bland. So I returned it, a bit reluctantly, but I don't have the cash (or the skills, yet) to justify two mandolins.

    All this by way of introducing myself to you folks, but also to solicit any other experiences along these lines, as well as advice: do you think if I got the setup tweaked on the 305 it would help with the E string, or is it just the limitation of an inexpensive instrument? The action seems set at a reasonable height, as well as being even across the strings, which is about all I can tell about the setup.

  2. #2

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Welcome to the cafe Mark.(Mas) is brutal.as folks around here will tell u. Kinda like the old Lay's chips comercials.U can't have just one!

  3. #3
    Mando accumulator allenhopkins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2006
    Location
    Rochester NY 14610
    Posts
    17,378

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    You're finding what many of us took a long time to learn: every instrument is a bit different, even two of the same make and model. Plus, there are the variables of string composition and gauge, set-up, playing technique. One MD-305 may have a first string that rings like a bell, another may sound more muted. One may be throaty and woody, one more balanced and rounded, one with a cutting clear treble.

    Consensus here seems to be that the Eastman "300" series mandolins are a good value for the price, and, in some cases, superior in sound to the higher models. But it varies, instrument to instrument. Definitely you can experiment with set-up, perhaps put a heavier gauge "E" string set on, and check to see if the sound improves as your technique develops.

    Just doing some guesstimation, it may be that the same qualities you like in the 305, the "woodier character" that you prefer, speak to a bassier emphasis that makes the treble strings seem less "clear." But there are loads of experiments you can try before conceding that you need a different mandolin to get more treble.

    In the end you may buy a different mandolin (many of us do) that is more like what you want to hear. Betcha it'll cost you more...
    Allen Hopkins
    Gibsn: '54 F5 3pt F2 A-N Custm K1 m'cello
    Natl Triolian Dobro mando
    Victoria b-back Merrill alumnm b-back
    H-O mandolinetto
    Stradolin Vega banjolin
    Sobell'dola Washburn b-back'dola
    Eastmn: 615'dola 805 m'cello
    Flatiron 3K OM

  4. The following members say thank you to allenhopkins for this post:


  5. #4
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Sometimes it's as simple as changing the string gauge. What strings are you playing?
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  6. #5
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Conneaut Lake, PA
    Posts
    4,147

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    You have been playing the 305 for nine months. The 515 is brand new. You need to play it in. I know people argue about that here but many swear an instrument improves the more you play it. It's so new it still thinks it's a tree.
    Don

    2016 Weber Custom Bitterroot F
    2011 Weber Bitterroot A
    1974 Martin Style A

  7. The following members say thank you to multidon for this post:


  8. #6
    Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Boulder, CO & Chesterfield, MO
    Posts
    2,562

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    You might try going to the Daddario EJ75 strings. A lot of folks use them to accentuate the high end.
    I think the satin finish on the MD305 contributes to the wood sound, but also the A vs F shapes do have different sounds. I think the additional solid wood of the F style scroll and points, and the way they attach to the top cause the top to be tighter and produce more response in the high end.

  9. #7
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2015
    Location
    Oak Park, IL
    Posts
    291

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Thanks folks. I use EJ 74's. Also the 515 was used, so I'm not sure about the new vs broken in issue. The satin finish on the 305 may have something to do with it. Maybe I'll try a thicker E set and see what that does.

  10. #8
    fishing with my mando darrylicshon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2014
    Location
    atlanta
    Posts
    1,303

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    When you try out other mandolins it is best to have your mandolin with you, that way you can tell if it is better or not , every room changes the sound some.
    Ibanez 70's 524, 521, 3 511's,2 512's,513,1 514,3 80s 513's, 522
    J Bovier F5-T custom shop
    Kiso Suzuki V900,
    The Loar lm600 Cherryburst
    morgan monroe mms-5wc,ovation
    Michael Kelly Octave Mandolin
    Emandos Northfield octave tele 4, Northfield custom jem octave mandolin 5 octave strat 8
    2 Flying v 8, octave 5, Exploryer octave 8 20"
    Fender mandostrat 4,3 Epip mandobird 2,4/8, Kentucky. KM300E Eastwood mandocaster
    Gold Tone F6,Badaax doubleneck 8/6

  11. #9
    ************** Caleb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    3,687

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Lots of folks (myself included) have put Cumberland Acoustics bridges on our Eastmans. It took the overall sound of my 505 to another level. (Eastman mandolins do vary a lot; my own sounds more contemporary than what you describe yours as.) The bridge and a pro install ran me just over $100 combined.

    I only suggest this to people who actually love their instrument and plan on keeping it though. Since you already like yours, and just want to improve its tone/sound, I'd say go for it. If you were doing the upgrade in hopes that it would cure the want for another mandolin, I would advise against it. All the CA bridge-equipped mandolins in the Classifieds over the years prove this point.
    ...

  12. #10
    Moderator MikeEdgerton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Howell, NJ
    Posts
    26,933

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Quote Originally Posted by colorado_al View Post
    ...also the A vs F shapes do have different sounds...
    I think there are a whole lot of people that will argue that isn't true.
    "It's comparable to playing a cheese slicer."
    --M. Stillion

    "Bargain instruments are no bargains if you can't play them"
    --J. Garber

  13. The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to MikeEdgerton For This Useful Post:


  14. #11
    Registered User
    Join Date
    Nov 2011
    Location
    Vancouver BC Canada
    Posts
    1,001

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    Your experience with Eastmans are exactly like mine . My 305 was woodier , fuller and more responsive than any 500 series F or A style I've played. I also struggled with a very thin sounding E string . A heavier gauge string will help with that . The 305 and 315 are in many opinions the fullest warmest Eastmans .

  15. #12
    Fatally Flawed Bill Kammerzell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Location
    Annapolis, MD
    Posts
    1,663

    Default Re: New member--also, Eastman 305 vs 515

    I owned an Eastman 305. Big price jump to a 515. I was going to get a 315 until I got a real bargain on a Loar LM 600. That woody hollow sound must come from that satin finish on the 305. Doesn't the 315 have the same finish? I went to Daddario EJ75 strings on the Loar 600 (Nitrocellulose finish), and it's begun to sound the way I like it. Nice bark on the chops and a great tone on the solos. I sold the 305 to pay for the Loar 600.
    Last edited by Bill Kammerzell; Dec-02-2015 at 9:28pm. Reason: spelling.

Bookmarks

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •