View Full Version : Why not a thinline style Mandolin?
elExtranjero
Jan-04-2005, 1:45pm
Is there any reason other than tradition not to construct a mandolin similar to Thinline guitars where the back and sides are one piece routed out?
Thanks,
John Flynn
Jan-04-2005, 3:45pm
The Rigels are not exactly as you describe, but there are in that direction. The sides and neck block are all routed as one piece. Then the back is routed and glues onto the "sides unit." The top starts out the same way. It's pretty unique and kind of the same idea.
glauber
Jan-04-2005, 4:21pm
Check out the Mid-Missouri "Mini-Mo".
mad dawg
Jan-04-2005, 4:37pm
...and the Weber Sweet-Pea (which is also a smaller instrument like the Mini-Mo)
Greenmando
Jan-04-2005, 6:05pm
The martin backpacker is made kind of like that, exactly like a bandsaw jewelry box.
Bob Grieco
Oct-25-2010, 9:42am
FWIW, the mini mo by BigMuddyMandolin.com is only 1 1/2 inches wide w/ a standard scale bolt on neck and same body height & width as the 2 inch wide Mid Mo and costs about 1/2 as much (300). NFI
Richard Moore
Oct-25-2010, 10:40am
And the National RM-1
crazymandolinist
Oct-25-2010, 11:04am
Didn't Orville do that too?
lenf12
Oct-25-2010, 11:47am
While the Mann semi-hollow electrics use a different construction method (neck thru body vs. bolt on neck), I think the result is similar to the old Tele Thinlines.
Len B.
Clearwater, FL
MANNDOLINS
Oct-25-2010, 11:58am
I also use that method on my flat back acoustics. (neck-thru, sides and back machined from same wood)
http://www.youtube.com/user/MANNDOLINS#p/u/13/OOs4kieppvs
Rob Grant
Oct-25-2010, 3:31pm
Why?
Sort of a waste of good timber. You could end up with stability problems (cracking and warpage).
MANNDOLINS
Oct-25-2010, 4:37pm
I actually "waste" about the same amount of timber as one wastes making a "traditional" mandolin.