vkioulaphides
Nov-19-2005, 6:06pm
News from the front— wait! or is it the rear? http://www.mandolincafe.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/rock.gif
I have often written of my heretofore little interest in the technique common amongst violinists and, in general, players of bowed strings: "finger substitution", i.e. playing the same note alternately with a different finger, thereby "forcing" the need of a shift, where otherwise there would have been none.
My misgivings to date were based on the fact that, once executed cleanly, a shift on a FRETTED instrument is effectively —and ideally— inaudible; a violinist, au contraire, could easily defend his/her choice of a finger substitution on grounds of the slight portamento, barely audible but still effective/affective musically.
I stand corrected—#hardly a better mandolinist but, at the very least, a less BAD one. http://www.mandolincafe.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif Finger subsitutions are good, good... They do wonders in smoothing out our shifting technique, gaining access to the higher positions, offering ready familiarity with the upper end of scales and arpeggios, etc.
Also, even if the substitution itself is inaudible, it most certainly contributes to a VERY audible —and highly desirable— legato approach to an instrument which otherwise, in the hands of the inept (e.g. Yours Truly) tends to sound rather choppy and dry, not mellifluous and lyrical.
OK, friends: enough talk; back to practice, finger substitutions and all. http://www.mandolincafe.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mandosmiley.gif
I have often written of my heretofore little interest in the technique common amongst violinists and, in general, players of bowed strings: "finger substitution", i.e. playing the same note alternately with a different finger, thereby "forcing" the need of a shift, where otherwise there would have been none.
My misgivings to date were based on the fact that, once executed cleanly, a shift on a FRETTED instrument is effectively —and ideally— inaudible; a violinist, au contraire, could easily defend his/her choice of a finger substitution on grounds of the slight portamento, barely audible but still effective/affective musically.
I stand corrected—#hardly a better mandolinist but, at the very least, a less BAD one. http://www.mandolincafe.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/biggrin.gif Finger subsitutions are good, good... They do wonders in smoothing out our shifting technique, gaining access to the higher positions, offering ready familiarity with the upper end of scales and arpeggios, etc.
Also, even if the substitution itself is inaudible, it most certainly contributes to a VERY audible —and highly desirable— legato approach to an instrument which otherwise, in the hands of the inept (e.g. Yours Truly) tends to sound rather choppy and dry, not mellifluous and lyrical.
OK, friends: enough talk; back to practice, finger substitutions and all. http://www.mandolincafe.net/iB_html/non-cgi/emoticons/mandosmiley.gif